<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/563948</link>
		<description>Comments by motor</description>
<item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Flaherty explains that extra $11 billion</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/08/flaherty-explains-that-extra-11-billion#IDComment141298515</link>
<description>&amp;quot;But I know they&amp;#039;re real...&amp;quot;  ------------------------------------  flaherty is unsure of what is real or not anymore  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 9 Apr 2011 18:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/08/flaherty-explains-that-extra-11-billion#IDComment141298515</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The Commons: So it ends</title>
<link>https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/03/25/the-commons-so-it-ends/#IDComment137645948</link>
<description>no kidding Emily  WTF are you rambling on about West?????  by the way...there is no &amp;#039;e&amp;#039; in &amp;#039;giving&amp;#039; </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 05:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/03/25/the-commons-so-it-ends/#IDComment137645948</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The Commons: So it ends</title>
<link>https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/03/25/the-commons-so-it-ends/#IDComment137645465</link>
<description>whereas harper, once again, pathetically, took no questions  coward    </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 05:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/03/25/the-commons-so-it-ends/#IDComment137645465</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Iggy&#039;s coalition problem</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/25/iggys-coalition-problem/#IDComment137540913</link>
<description>only conservatives are afraid of a coalition </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/25/iggys-coalition-problem/#IDComment137540913</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The Commons: Who&#039;s laughing now?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/21/the-commons-whos-laughing-now#IDComment136608699</link>
<description>&amp;ldquo;Maybe he should look at the Federal Accountability Act and look at the great changes, especially, that this Prime Minister has ushered in.&amp;rdquo;                                                                 ----------------------------------------------------------------  You mean these changes mr baird?  Lying  The Conservatives cut five rules from the old conflict of interest code, which has been amalgamated into the Federal Accountability Act. One of the nixed rules required the prime minister, cabinet ministers and senior government officials to &amp;ldquo;act with honesty&amp;rdquo;&amp;mdash;meaning that politicians are now technically allowed to deceive.  Lobbying  No part of the act requires ministers to disclose contact with lobbyists, even though the Conservatives promised Bill C-2 would put an end to backroom lobbying.  Secrecy  The Conservative government promised to ensure that disclosure requirements of the Access to Information Act would not be trumped by secrecy provisions in other federal acts, but hasn&amp;rsquo;t followed through. This means it is allowed to withhold public information in the interest of national security.  Conflict of interest  Cabinet ministers are still allowed to be involved in policymaking decisions that affect their personal financial interests, due to the removal of five rules from the conflict of interest code, including one that that requires those in public office to avoid &amp;ldquo;real, potential or apparent conflicts of interest.&amp;rdquo;  Whistle-blowing  The Conservatives promised that all Canadians who report government wrongdoing would be protected from harm, but Bill C-2 disappoints again. While most&amp;mdash;but not all&amp;mdash;government employees are protected under the law, civilians are left no legal recourse if fired, demoted, sued or otherwise harassed by employers should they report on shady dealings with a government agency. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 00:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/21/the-commons-whos-laughing-now#IDComment136608699</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : This week in pop culture references</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/02/this-week-in-pop-culture-references/#IDComment131898894</link>
<description>.....&amp;quot; He&amp;rsquo;s like the Charlie Sheen of Canadian democracy. &amp;quot;.....                          --------------------------  good one! </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Mar 2011 18:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/02/this-week-in-pop-culture-references/#IDComment131898894</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The Commons: &#039;Let her speak&#039;</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/28/the-commons-a-five-year-old-accounting-dispute/#IDComment131443515</link>
<description>what&amp;#039;s truly pathetic is subversion of democracy and anyone who supports those who take part in it </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Mar 2011 00:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/28/the-commons-a-five-year-old-accounting-dispute/#IDComment131443515</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The Commons: &#039;Let her speak&#039;</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/28/the-commons-a-five-year-old-accounting-dispute/#IDComment131442143</link>
<description>seriously, when has mr. poilievre ever been factually forthcoming with Canadians </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Mar 2011 00:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/28/the-commons-a-five-year-old-accounting-dispute/#IDComment131442143</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The Bev Oda affair and the Tories&#039; scandal-management strategy</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/28/what-it-takes-to-get-fired/#IDComment131412804</link>
<description>the difference between those who are disciplined and those who aren&amp;#039;t is easy to explain.  those who are disciplined were because of their own actions whereas  those who are not disciplined are just following the prime minister&amp;#039;s orders  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/28/what-it-takes-to-get-fired/#IDComment131412804</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The Commons: The hangover and the afterglow</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/09/the-commons-the-hangover-and-the-afterglow/#IDComment114798406</link>
<description>I see harper missed work today </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/09/the-commons-the-hangover-and-the-afterglow/#IDComment114798406</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : How do you feel about the Senate abolishing a climate change bill adopted by the House of Commons?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/22/how-do-you-feel-about-the-senate-abolishing-a-climate-change-bill-adopted-by-the-house-of-commons/#IDComment111838115</link>
<description>actually the simple fact is that you don&amp;#039;t know the facts. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 06:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/22/how-do-you-feel-about-the-senate-abolishing-a-climate-change-bill-adopted-by-the-house-of-commons/#IDComment111838115</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : How do you feel about the Senate abolishing a climate change bill adopted by the House of Commons?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/22/how-do-you-feel-about-the-senate-abolishing-a-climate-change-bill-adopted-by-the-house-of-commons/#IDComment111837878</link>
<description>it was not the senate that trashed this bill after the HoC&amp;#039;s passed it, it was the reform/conservative senators.    please put the blame where it belongs and don&amp;#039;t blame the entire senate. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 05:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/22/how-do-you-feel-about-the-senate-abolishing-a-climate-change-bill-adopted-by-the-house-of-commons/#IDComment111837878</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Ignatieff gets personal</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/19/getting-personal/#IDComment107126399</link>
<description>John Geddes  his name is Michael Ignatieff not Iggy  enough of the lazy journalism    </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Nov 2010 06:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/19/getting-personal/#IDComment107126399</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The right way to think about Stephen Harper</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/27/the-right-way-to-think-about-stephen-harper/#IDComment106684321</link>
<description>I do </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 03:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/27/the-right-way-to-think-about-stephen-harper/#IDComment106684321</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The Commons: Sergeant Harper deploys his decibels</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/28/the-commons-sergeant-harper/#IDComment106667788</link>
<description>harper is insane  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/28/the-commons-sergeant-harper/#IDComment106667788</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The Commons: Stephen Harper lets it all out</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/27/the-commons-stephen-harper-lets-it-all-out/#IDComment106593156</link>
<description>well thank you for the invitation Dennis, I think I&amp;#039;ll do just as you ask  harper voted to cancel the helicopter purchase in 1993 which he admits was a mistake and is now saying is the reason we need to spend a gazillion dollars of cost overruns on helicopters and new shiny  planes without a plan for the military future (Defence Minister peter mackay told Lt.-Gen. Leslie to figure out the military&amp;rsquo;s future) </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/27/the-commons-stephen-harper-lets-it-all-out/#IDComment106593156</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The right way to think about Stephen Harper</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/27/the-right-way-to-think-about-stephen-harper/#IDComment106463853</link>
<description>He&amp;#039;s right, harper is not a dictator   harper is clearly a Fascist </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/27/the-right-way-to-think-about-stephen-harper/#IDComment106463853</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The Commons: Stephen Harper lets it all out</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/27/the-commons-stephen-harper-lets-it-all-out/#IDComment106463049</link>
<description>&amp;ldquo;The reason there are problems with the helicopters is because 17 years ago the Liberal government cancelled the helicopter contract,&amp;rdquo; he ( harper) cried,                                                                               ------------------------- Didn&amp;#039;t harper vote in favor of the cancellation of said helicopters in 1993?  Hypocrite  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/27/the-commons-stephen-harper-lets-it-all-out/#IDComment106463049</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The Commons: Repeat after Rona</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/25/the-commons-repeat-after-rona/#IDComment106113932</link>
<description>To me, Rona Ambrose looks like &amp;#039;Sam the Eagle&amp;#039;  I&amp;#039;m sure Sam is much more intelligent though.   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=5301685&amp;amp;id=109860445606&amp;amp;ref=fbx_album&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=5301685&amp;amp...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 06:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/25/the-commons-repeat-after-rona/#IDComment106113932</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The Commons: Who loves ya, baby?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/21/the-commons-who-loves-ya-baby/#IDComment105362838</link>
<description>why is baird responding to questions  can the ministers not answer for themselves  where is the accountability  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 03:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/21/the-commons-who-loves-ya-baby/#IDComment105362838</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>