<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/628840</link>
		<description>Comments by moralmattersorg</description>
<item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Allah In The Family–5 Ways Sharia is Impacting America Right Now</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/21/allah-in-the-family-5-ways-sharia-is-impacting-america-right-now-1/#IDComment94570448</link>
<description>Sharia law -- especially its [animal] treatment of women, is not seen by American liberal / extremists to be a serious threat.  Why?  Because radical libs embrace political correctness and multiculturalism which essentially and falsely believes that all value systems are equal and thereby have inherent rights to be fully and freely exercised.  Therefore I maintain that a liberal / extremist cannot logically or morally exist with any semblance of intellectual equilibrium.  Only when a liberal / extremist&amp;#039;s life is personally threatened, will then, that person re-evaluate his philosophical BS. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 17:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/21/allah-in-the-family-5-ways-sharia-is-impacting-america-right-now-1/#IDComment94570448</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Christian Radical Joseph Farah Vs Conservative Ann Coulter</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/christian-radical-joseph-farah-vs-conservative-ann-coulter/#IDComment94568270</link>
<description>Remainder of the above reply comment:  Furthermore, I ask:  &amp;quot;How many commentaries have you written in the past slamming those [liberal extremists] who shut out Coulter from speaking?  Why &amp;quot;take it out&amp;quot; on Farah, simply because his religious views encompass [perhaps] so much more than yours?  Why &amp;quot;take it out&amp;quot; on Farah because frontpagemag does not endorse his &amp;quot;birther&amp;quot; views and North American Union views?  American conservatives must unite and not fight.  Dissing another conservative because they have a more strict view of homosexuality is no cause to intentionally malign them.  Finally, I take exception [and, offense] to your view, that I disrespect you and David Horowitz.  Even though I believe that David has some way to go to come to the [full] knowledge of genuine religious belief and experience, I truly appreciate his support for Israel and his denounciation of Islamic terrorism.  For you, writing for frontpagemag -- you have made a good choice.  Please -- no more divisive, targetted commentaries, like the Coulter / Farah one........  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 17:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/christian-radical-joseph-farah-vs-conservative-ann-coulter/#IDComment94568270</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Christian Radical Joseph Farah Vs Conservative Ann Coulter</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/christian-radical-joseph-farah-vs-conservative-ann-coulter/#IDComment94567581</link>
<description>FYI -- I&amp;#039;ve finally read your entire commentary, and believe (even, more so) that my initial comment was spot on.  I will compliment you, though, on including WND&amp;#039;S David Kuplien&amp;#039;s comment info. However, I maintain that your commentary was initially designed to unfairly brass knuckle Farah&amp;#039;s conservative principles.  And, you skillfully [using left wing extremist tactics] did that.  But what have you now accomplished?  The conservative tent is big enough for Farah and Coulter.  But you now have driven a wedge -- and, for what redeeming purpose?  Remainder of the [above] reply comment, to follow:    </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 17:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/christian-radical-joseph-farah-vs-conservative-ann-coulter/#IDComment94567581</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Christian Radical Joseph Farah Vs Conservative Ann Coulter</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/christian-radical-joseph-farah-vs-conservative-ann-coulter/#IDComment94502890</link>
<description>I can tell from your defensive reply that I must have hit some raw nerves. Your continuing remarks about Farah and your generalizing broad conclusions about him and his influence almost makes me believe that you ostracize him from the conservative playing field because of his commitment to Biblical Christianity. [I say this, knowing where Frontpgagemag is coming from -- attempting to trumpet morality apart from the Christ of the Scriptures. That is your and David Horowitz&amp;#039;s choice -- as much respect as I have for Mr. Horowitz and his wonderful stand against anti-Semitism and terrorism].   I think that you are jumping to emotional conclusions when you suggest that I disrespect you and David Horowitz. You simply find it difficult to be criticized -- face it. If you want to threaten me with explosion from frontpagemag.com and contributing -- that is your pleasure. But, be that as it may -- I think that you would be acting rather infantile.    </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 06:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/christian-radical-joseph-farah-vs-conservative-ann-coulter/#IDComment94502890</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Christian Radical Joseph Farah Vs Conservative Ann Coulter</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/christian-radical-joseph-farah-vs-conservative-ann-coulter/#IDComment94500438</link>
<description>I can tell from your defensive reply that I must have hit some raw nerves.  Your continuing remarks about Farah and your generalizing broad conclusions about him and his influence almost makes me believe that you ostracize him from the conservative playing field because of his commitment to Biblical Christianity.  [I say this, knowing where Frontpgagemag is coming from -- attempting to trumpet morality apart from the Christ of the Scriptures.  That is your and David Horowitz&amp;#039;s choice -- as much respect as I have for Mr. Horowitz and his wonderful stand against anti-Semitism and terrorism].  I think that you are jumping to emotional conclusions when you suggest that I disrespect you and David Horowitz.  You simply find it difficult to be criticized -- face it.  If you want to threaten me with explosion from frontpagemag.com and contributing -- that is your pleasure.  But, be that as it may -- I think that you would be acting rather infantile. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 05:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/christian-radical-joseph-farah-vs-conservative-ann-coulter/#IDComment94500438</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Christian Radical Joseph Farah Vs Conservative Ann Coulter</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/christian-radical-joseph-farah-vs-conservative-ann-coulter/#IDComment94498917</link>
<description>I cannot agree with your generalizing and sweeping conclusions about Farah. Without substantiating your wild claims -- you go on with your comment.  [And, please don&amp;#039;t tell me to refer to past commentaries by Frontpagemag that supposedly refute what you would consider, &amp;quot;nonsense.&amp;quot; If, at all, you should be open to more possibilities than what you are closing yourself off, to.........]  I&amp;#039;ve now read the rest of Mr. Swindle&amp;#039;s hatchet piece and I am even more convinced of its trashy &amp;quot;quality.&amp;quot;  From the &amp;quot;git-go&amp;quot; he is off to the races in condemning Farah, utilizing inflammatory words such as suggesting that Farah would like to &amp;quot;excommunicate everyone&amp;quot; that does not agree with him.  Words such as &amp;quot;radical&amp;quot; pointed to Farah and insinuating that he would like a Christian Theocracy are commentary words of desperation on Mr. Swindle&amp;#039;s part to unjustly and unfairly paint an American conservative media person.  Your comment isn&amp;#039;t much better.........  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 05:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/christian-radical-joseph-farah-vs-conservative-ann-coulter/#IDComment94498917</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Christian Radical Joseph Farah Vs Conservative Ann Coulter</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/christian-radical-joseph-farah-vs-conservative-ann-coulter/#IDComment94498526</link>
<description>Calvin Freiburger,  I cannot agree with your generalizing and sweeping conclusions about Farah.  Here is what you say:  .......Farah has been peddling conspiratorial nonsense like Birtherism and the North American Union too long to be taken seriously by any conservative.&amp;quot;  Without substantiating your wild claim -- you go on with your comment.  [And, please don&amp;#039;t tell me to refer to past commentaries by Frontpagemag that supposedly refute what you would consider, &amp;quot;nonsense.&amp;quot; If, at all, you should be open to more possibilities than what you are closing yourself off, to.........]  Remainder of the comment, to follow:   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 05:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/christian-radical-joseph-farah-vs-conservative-ann-coulter/#IDComment94498526</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Christian Radical Joseph Farah Vs Conservative Ann Coulter</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/christian-radical-joseph-farah-vs-conservative-ann-coulter/#IDComment94495663</link>
<description>David Swindle,   I cannot agree with your distorted logic. If I smell a skunk, I don&amp;#039;t need to locate it to know that its smell is putrid and that it is in the neighborhood. If I am at sea and spot the tip of an iceberg, I don&amp;#039;t need to plunge myself underneath the cold waters to understand the danger. Your personal propaganda piece from the title and beginning had the traits of a hit piece with which I cared not to waste my time. Not only did you appear to vilify Farah for his commitment to Biblical Christianity but you unfairly attempted to compare Farah in the process, to Coulter . In my opinion your commentary had the smackings of a shameful piece. Maybe you&amp;#039;ve been reading too many liberal / extremist hit pieces.....???   Furthermore, if you were genuinely committed to American [traditional] conservatism, you would not take occasion to write what you did, slamming Farah. [Farah is not a vestigial political organ to toss away] Conservatism can be a big tent if one has the smarts to realize that there are varying degrees. But to split hairs is a foolish thing to do.  Finally, just because Farah axed Coulter from her planned speaking engagement -- that is no [just] occasion for you to do a hatchet job on Farah.  Farah knows along with other committed Christians that American conservatism and the GOP must guard against the encroachment of homosexual activism.  Once homosexual activists get a firm foothold on conservatism and the GOP -- that is the GOP&amp;#039;S death sentence.  It will no longer be a political force to be reckoned with...............   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 04:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/christian-radical-joseph-farah-vs-conservative-ann-coulter/#IDComment94495663</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Christian Radical Joseph Farah Vs Conservative Ann Coulter</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/christian-radical-joseph-farah-vs-conservative-ann-coulter/#IDComment94384841</link>
<description>Jon Rowe:  Maybe no credible statistics that your mind will allow.  But there are credible stats.  The homosexual lifestyle is not beneficial on many &amp;quot;fronts:&amp;quot;  &amp;quot;Help for Homosexuals, Lesbians, Etc.&amp;quot;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.moralmatters.org/Help-for-homosexuals.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.moralmatters.org/Help-for-homosexuals....&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/christian-radical-joseph-farah-vs-conservative-ann-coulter/#IDComment94384841</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Christian Radical Joseph Farah Vs Conservative Ann Coulter</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/christian-radical-joseph-farah-vs-conservative-ann-coulter/#IDComment94383934</link>
<description>What is so holy with the word, &amp;quot;conservative?&amp;quot;  Perhaps, Farah, when he made this comment, did not care to &amp;quot;label&amp;quot; himself a &amp;quot;conservative.&amp;quot;  What is wrong with that?  The reality remains, Swindle&amp;#039;s piece was of a trashy sort -- attempting to elevate the often controversial Coulter by comparing her to someone out of her league. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/christian-radical-joseph-farah-vs-conservative-ann-coulter/#IDComment94383934</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Christian Radical Joseph Farah Vs Conservative Ann Coulter</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/christian-radical-joseph-farah-vs-conservative-ann-coulter/#IDComment94382876</link>
<description>Aspacia:  According to your thinking, Christ, was &amp;quot;very religious.&amp;quot;  But, did that make Him &amp;quot;intolerant?&amp;quot;  Of course not!  I think that you have lost the traditional definition of &amp;quot;tolerance.&amp;#039;  You have, no doubt bought into the politically correct / multicultural, definition. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/christian-radical-joseph-farah-vs-conservative-ann-coulter/#IDComment94382876</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Christian Radical Joseph Farah Vs Conservative Ann Coulter</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/christian-radical-joseph-farah-vs-conservative-ann-coulter/#IDComment94382307</link>
<description>Andrew -- Answering your last question:  One does not have to wade through an entire junkyard to realize that he is in the midst of a trash heap.  Swindle&amp;#039;s intention was obvious from the &amp;quot;git-go.&amp;quot;  If you could not perceive that -- then, I don&amp;#039;t expect to convince you.  One other thing -- my comment was not designed to either support Coulter&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; credentials or refute them.  Swindle&amp;#039;s dishonest comparison of Coulter and Farah was simply a &amp;quot;chip off the old liberal propaganda hatchet job block.&amp;quot;   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/christian-radical-joseph-farah-vs-conservative-ann-coulter/#IDComment94382307</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Christian Radical Joseph Farah Vs Conservative Ann Coulter</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/christian-radical-joseph-farah-vs-conservative-ann-coulter/#IDComment94304668</link>
<description>Mr. Swindle:  This propaganda commentary is about the worst I read from you.  In fact it was so bad that I didn&amp;#039;t bother after several paragraphs.  Your commentary sets out to substantiate your false and bashing title, targeting Joseph Farah, as a misfit.  In comparing Farah to Coulter you make Ann out to be a kitten.  By the way.....where did you get that innocent [out of character] looking pic of Coulter?  But, more specifically, you illogically jump to broad and generalizing conclusions about Farah with the first Farah quote in your shameful commentary.  You then attempt to paint Coulter as a true blue conservative while damning Farah for his Christian commitment to Scripture.  You diss him by falsely claiming that he personalizes and preaches &amp;quot;his&amp;quot; version of Christianity.  By utilizing the fallacious tactic of &amp;quot;poisoning the well&amp;quot; vis-a-vis Farah, you are able to complete your hatchet piece.  Shame on you!  You bring discredit to Frontpagemage.com with your BS ridicule! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 04:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/christian-radical-joseph-farah-vs-conservative-ann-coulter/#IDComment94304668</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : MSNBC Host: &#039;I Busted My Ass For Obama&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/msnbc-host-i-busted-my-ass-for-obama/#IDComment88494477</link>
<description>Big Eddie must have an inferiority complex.  He struts back and forth like a fanatic TV evangelist. He is a sicko of the first sort......... </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 13:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/msnbc-host-i-busted-my-ass-for-obama/#IDComment88494477</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia dead at 92</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GKD2M80&show_article=1#IDComment82782503</link>
<description>I can&amp;rsquo;t help but think that while the mainstream liberal / extremist media lauds the [older than dirt] longstanding political career of Senator Byrd and the umpteen millions of earmark money he took from the nation&amp;rsquo;s taxpayers to pump into West Virginia, if there will be the slightest mention of his liberal voting record, supporting the continued American abortion genocide.   It was commendable that Senator Byrd renounced his past affiliation with the KKK &amp;mdash; but, no where do I ever remember Byrd renouncing his liberal political party&amp;rsquo;s support for crimes against humanity vis-a-vis their support for the needless, wanton and unnecessary destruction of fellow human beings, and, those abortion victims&amp;rsquo;, posterity.  An interesting article to read &amp;mdash; if one challenges himself to think outside the political correctness box, is,:  &amp;ldquo;Abortion genocide:&amp;rdquo;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://conservapedia.com/Abortion_genocide&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://conservapedia.com/Abortion_genocide&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GKD2M80&show_article=1#IDComment82782503</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : What’s God Got to Do with It?  (A Reponse on Abortion to David Swindle, et al.)</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/06/15/what%e2%80%99s-god-got-to-do-with-it-a-reponse-on-abortion-to-david-swindle-et-al/#IDComment80346339</link>
<description>trickyblain:  Excellent comment response.    I&amp;#039;ve always thought that the exceptions of &amp;quot;rape and incest&amp;quot;  and endangerment to the mother&amp;#039;s health&amp;quot;  were  &amp;quot;convenient&amp;quot; excuses for the aborting mother to do away with her offspring -- whether or not there was any rape or incest, or health issues, involved.  But, I will have to admit that there are those legitimate cases of pregnancies resulting from rape and incest.  Aren&amp;#039;t we talking a small 1% or much less?  But even if less than 1% of all pregnancies result, due to rape and / or, incest, the mother than is playing God by being chief executioner.  Those mothers pay heavy prices with lifetimes of post abortion tramas.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 02:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/06/15/what%e2%80%99s-god-got-to-do-with-it-a-reponse-on-abortion-to-david-swindle-et-al/#IDComment80346339</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama declares \&#039;reckless\&#039; BP will pay Gulf cleanup</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GC2SCG0&show_article=1#IDComment80343828</link>
<description>That sign shown along the president&amp;#039;s motorcade -- &amp;quot;Obama, you are useless,&amp;quot; somewhat sums up the frustration of many, directly affected by the Gulf Oil Spill.    The reality is, -- Obama has responded with too little, too late.  Now after many weeks, he wants to [selfishly] salvage his damaged presidency.  His action of having the Miss. Governor come up with a plan of battle for the oil spill, further reinforces the obvious that Obama is not a leader and, an executive who can readily and positively respond, when disaster strikes.   </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 02:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GC2SCG0&show_article=1#IDComment80343828</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Pope begs forgiveness, promises action on abuse</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9G9E8HO0&show_article=1#IDComment79680082</link>
<description>Continued from prior unfinished comment:  Thinking outside the political correctness box -- Why is president Obama our nation&amp;#039;s chief sex offender?  &amp;quot;The President of the United States: A Sex Offender?  -- Why Obama&amp;#039;s support of the abortion industry is the worst molestation of youth (9/20/09):&amp;quot;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.moralmatters.org/Ser9-20-09Pres-aSexOffender.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.moralmatters.org/Ser9-20-09Pres-aSexOf...&lt;/a&gt;  Also:  &amp;quot;What did Senator Kennedy have in common with President Obama and the late Abortionist, George Tiller? -- (9/6/09):&amp;quot;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.moralmatters.org/Ser9-20-09Pres-aSexOffender.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.moralmatters.org/Ser9-20-09Pres-aSexOf...&lt;/a&gt;  Let not the news media just start and stop with the Catholic Church.  Let the media go all the way with some across the board exposure, reporting! </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 02:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9G9E8HO0&show_article=1#IDComment79680082</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Pope begs forgiveness, promises action on abuse</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9G9E8HO0&show_article=1#IDComment79680059</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m not Catholic.  But I&amp;#039;m not going to jump on the bandwagon and unreasonably condemn the Catholic Church for this obvious repeated sin by some of its clergy.  All sexual abuse and molestation is inexcusable and is absolutely, heinous.  I will say, however, that it would be quite refreshing and honest if the news media would give as much reporting attention to the sex scandals perpetrated against youth in public schools across this nation and world.  Estimates of this type of sex offense, I&amp;#039;ve read, far outstrip the abuses of Catholic clergy.  Furthermore -- it would be honest and proper if the media were to hone in on the sex offenses of politicians, worldwide.   Continued.................  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 02:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9G9E8HO0&show_article=1#IDComment79680059</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Analysis: High-seas raid deepens Israeli isolation</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9G21IQO0&show_article=1#IDComment77944315</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Part 2:&amp;quot;  Contrary to Jewish Hate-mongering Propaganda --   What you won&amp;#039;t read and hear from the politically correct and bigoted liberal news media:   &amp;quot;Gaza Relief Ship Martyrs &amp;ndash; Lethal Weapons in a War of Images:&amp;quot;  .........From start to finish, the Humanitarian flotilla was a textbook operation in the chief war against Israel, the war of global opinion. Those who organized the convoy were well aware that, arriving in proximity to Gaza, they would be stopped by Israeli Defense Forces. The purpose of the convey was to choreograph another drama in which Israel would be obliged to choose between being cast on the international stage as the evil starvers of innocent, trapped women and children, or avoiding the censure by allowing ships, possibly carrying weapons and warriors, into Gaza..........   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/05/31/gaza-relief-ship-martyrs-%e2%80%93-lethal-weapons-in-a-war-of-images/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/05/31/gaza-relie...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 20:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9G21IQO0&show_article=1#IDComment77944315</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>