<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/558497</link>
		<description>Comments by moonvest</description>
<item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Cars 2: Buy Our Toys</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/16/cars-2-buy-our-toys/#IDComment110131650</link>
<description>Cars is definitely my least favourite. Too long, and it was missing that essential, Pixar-y quality (sense of wonder? heart? I don&amp;#039;t know) that the other movies have. That said, everyone I know with kids says that Cars is their kids&amp;#039; favourite Pixar movie.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/16/cars-2-buy-our-toys/#IDComment110131650</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Holy war</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/18/holy-war/#IDComment104625067</link>
<description>Like you keep saying, or like you keep constantly demonstrating? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/18/holy-war/#IDComment104625067</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Yo, Coop!</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/30/yo-coop/#IDComment101724705</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m curious as to why you seem so skeptical of Anderson Cooper&amp;#039;s new show. He&amp;#039;s handsome, charming, funny, is gay enough to indulge in dishy gossip, and still masculine (and closeted) enough not to frighten middle America. For a daytime talk show, that sounds like a demographic perfect storm.   It does strike me as a curious career move, but the show itself doesn&amp;#039;t sound like an obvious flop.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Oct 2010 00:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/30/yo-coop/#IDComment101724705</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Look at what you can make with a rice cooker</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/20/look-at-what-you-can-make-with-a-rice-cooker/#IDComment100260850</link>
<description>Ebert wrote a long blog post once about his love for his rice cooker, maybe that was it? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 22:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/20/look-at-what-you-can-make-with-a-rice-cooker/#IDComment100260850</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Eight more for the list</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/19/eight-more-for-the-list/#IDComment94391287</link>
<description>Name one follower who holds tremendous influence. By definition they don&amp;#039;t.   Isn&amp;#039;t what you&amp;#039;re saying that the census is a &amp;quot;leader&amp;quot; but you don&amp;#039;t think it should be? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/19/eight-more-for-the-list/#IDComment94391287</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : An unlikely conspirator in Prop 8&#039;s murder</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/05/an-unlikely-conspirator-in-prop-8s-murder/#IDComment90973960</link>
<description>&amp;quot;&amp;#039;domestic partnerships&amp;#039;&amp;mdash;a species invented in order to endow gays and lesbians with all the legal difficulties of civil marriage without entitling them to drink from the dregs of its social dignity.&amp;quot;  Perfect. Thanks for making my day with this one, Colby.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/05/an-unlikely-conspirator-in-prop-8s-murder/#IDComment90973960</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : TV Viewers Are Old</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/03/tv-viewers-are-old/#IDComment90787015</link>
<description>Not watching television doesn&amp;#039;t make you better than anyone. It makes you a person who doesn&amp;#039;t watch television.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Aug 2010 13:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/03/tv-viewers-are-old/#IDComment90787015</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Forgotten by airline, nine-year-old boy spends day in Chicago airport</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/26/forgotten-by-airline-nine-year-old-boy-spends-day-in-chicago-airport/#IDComment89153443</link>
<description>I would be too, but I&amp;#039;m willing to bet the &amp;quot;gesture of goodwill&amp;quot; included a contract saying the family couldn&amp;#039;t sue the airline.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/26/forgotten-by-airline-nine-year-old-boy-spends-day-in-chicago-airport/#IDComment89153443</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : A Network Is Willing to Pay [For] DAMAGES</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/19/a-network-is-willing-to-pay-for-damages/#IDComment87667220</link>
<description>I enjoyed Damages, but I thought the finale was set up nicely as a series ender. Now that Ellen knows that Patty has regrets about her choices, it&amp;#039;s going to be a lot harder to sympathize with Ellen following the same path.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/19/a-network-is-willing-to-pay-for-damages/#IDComment87667220</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Charges laid in Montreal fatal dog attack</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/08/charges-laid-in-montreal-fatal-dog-attack/#IDComment79122674</link>
<description>Was this story written by Babelfish? &amp;quot;The mother is 17 years old woman&amp;quot;? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/08/charges-laid-in-montreal-fatal-dog-attack/#IDComment79122674</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Rumours of Conan</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/27/rumours-of-conan/#IDComment77414131</link>
<description>Doesn&amp;#039;t Comedy Network run Daily Show/Colbert at 11pm? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 02:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/27/rumours-of-conan/#IDComment77414131</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Polanski: U.S. wants to serve me &#039;on a platter&#039;</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/04/polanski-u-s-wants-to-serve-me-on-a-platter/#IDComment72426377</link>
<description>Poor, put-upon rapist.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 May 2010 16:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/04/polanski-u-s-wants-to-serve-me-on-a-platter/#IDComment72426377</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The Double Down: your move, America</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/20/the-double-down-your-move-america/#IDComment69025088</link>
<description>Heh. I got nailed under Pollan-ites.   Seriously though, how mad can you be about an idea that was literally stolen from an episode of 30 Rock?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spike.com/video/30-rock-meat-machine/2812547&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.spike.com/video/30-rock-meat-machine/2...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/20/the-double-down-your-move-america/#IDComment69025088</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Nearing midday in Guergis</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/15/nearing-midday-in-guergis/#IDComment68224746</link>
<description>Unless he&amp;#039;s doing this to drum up new business or cash in his 15 minutes, I have a hard time time believing he was offering this information to either party for free.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/15/nearing-midday-in-guergis/#IDComment68224746</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Today in all that</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/10/today-in-all-that/#IDComment67447325</link>
<description>The Toronto Star was the paper the broke the nanny story and ran with it, frontpage, for days. Are you honestly saying they did to help her chances in the next election? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/10/today-in-all-that/#IDComment67447325</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Apparently There&#039;s This Show Called Glee...</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/11/apparently-theres-this-show-called-glee/#IDComment67420802</link>
<description>I really don&amp;#039;t enjoy Glee, but I have to say that the promotional machine behind the show is amazing. The &amp;quot;L&amp;quot; posters I see plastered all over Toronto are cute and clever, and the Glee-FM thing Global is doing with some radio station is a pretty brilliant idea. Glee fans seem particularly rabid, so I don&amp;#039;t think the show is in danger of losing momentum the way The Office and Gossip Girl stalled out after they came back from hiatus. That said, the music on the show is just terrible, and it&amp;#039;s the main reason I can&amp;#039;t watch. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/11/apparently-theres-this-show-called-glee/#IDComment67420802</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Champion of right-wing America lashes out at Canadian university</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/23/champion-of-right-wing-america-lashes-out-at-canadian-university/#IDComment63692235</link>
<description>&amp;ldquo;I was hoping for a fruit basket upon my arrival in Canada, not a threat to criminally prosecute me.&amp;rdquo;  Whatever, lady. The letter was dumb, but if it wasn&amp;#039;t for negative attention, poor Ms. Coulter would receive no attention at all.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/23/champion-of-right-wing-america-lashes-out-at-canadian-university/#IDComment63692235</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : PepsiCo trims the fat</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/22/pepsico-trims-the-fat/#IDComment63549061</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m sure the sugar and salt substitutes will be much healthier. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/22/pepsico-trims-the-fat/#IDComment63549061</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : American Idol: the beautiful, but not too beautiful</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/15/american-idol-the-beautiful-but-not-too-beautiful/#IDComment62421748</link>
<description>The Carrie Underwood who was on American Idol doesn&amp;#039;t look a whole lot like the current Carrie Underwood. Don&amp;#039;t get me wrong, she&amp;#039;s always been cute, but she&amp;#039;s also had a pretty big makeover, including losing some (too much?) weight.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/15/american-idol-the-beautiful-but-not-too-beautiful/#IDComment62421748</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : A pox on Fox</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/16/a-pox-on-fox/#IDComment62412796</link>
<description>I would love to see an example of Fox News asking conservatives tough questions and not settling for evasions.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/16/a-pox-on-fox/#IDComment62412796</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>