<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/910502</link>
		<description>Comments by modster99</description>
<item>
<title>theCHIVE : Chivettes bored at work (24 Photos)</title>
<link>http://thechive.com/2012/11/07/chivettes-bored-at-work-24-photos-5#IDComment483428274</link>
<description>#10 - this chick is going to get mobbed. lol </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Nov 2012 21:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thechive.com/2012/11/07/chivettes-bored-at-work-24-photos-5#IDComment483428274</guid>
</item><item>
<title>theCHIVE : Chivettes bored at work (24 Photos)</title>
<link>http://thechive.com/2012/11/07/chivettes-bored-at-work-24-photos-5#IDComment483427448</link>
<description>#5 I want to work in this place. :) </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Nov 2012 21:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thechive.com/2012/11/07/chivettes-bored-at-work-24-photos-5#IDComment483427448</guid>
</item><item>
<title>theCHIVE : Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose (34 Photos)</title>
<link>http://thechive.com/2012/11/07/sometimes-you-win-sometimes-you-lose-34-photos-2/#IDComment483421501</link>
<description>#4 - is that blonde hair under the umbrella? Just asking. :) </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Nov 2012 21:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thechive.com/2012/11/07/sometimes-you-win-sometimes-you-lose-34-photos-2/#IDComment483421501</guid>
</item><item>
<title>theCHIVE : FLBP: A small price to pay for top heavy domination (36 Photos)</title>
<link>http://thechive.com/2011/11/07/flbp-a-small-price-to-pay-for-top-heavy-splendor-36-photos#IDComment482720436</link>
<description>Who the heck is #20? wow </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Nov 2012 04:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thechive.com/2011/11/07/flbp-a-small-price-to-pay-for-top-heavy-splendor-36-photos#IDComment482720436</guid>
</item><item>
<title>theCHIVE : Why would you ever get out of bed? (44 Photos)</title>
<link>http://thechive.com/2012/11/06/why-would-you-ever-get-out-of-bed-44-photos#IDComment482710695</link>
<description>All of these women are incredible, but does anyone know who #9 is, and where she might have a few more photos?  Also, how does one go about attaching the picture to one of these posts? Thanks for the info.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Nov 2012 04:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thechive.com/2012/11/06/why-would-you-ever-get-out-of-bed-44-photos#IDComment482710695</guid>
</item><item>
<title>theCHIVE : Why would you ever get out of bed? (44 Photos)</title>
<link>http://thechive.com/2012/11/06/why-would-you-ever-get-out-of-bed-44-photos#IDComment482706381</link>
<description>Agreed. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Nov 2012 04:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thechive.com/2012/11/06/why-would-you-ever-get-out-of-bed-44-photos#IDComment482706381</guid>
</item><item>
<title>theCHIVE : Why would you ever get out of bed? (44 Photos)</title>
<link>http://thechive.com/2012/11/06/why-would-you-ever-get-out-of-bed-44-photos#IDComment482705860</link>
<description>WTF are you talking about? Seriously!!! </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Nov 2012 04:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thechive.com/2012/11/06/why-would-you-ever-get-out-of-bed-44-photos#IDComment482705860</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Looking north</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north/#IDComment150415601</link>
<description>That is absolutely what caused it. It wasn&amp;#039;t just ethnic borrowers - everyone could borrow under this law. People were speculating, and they went crazy. This helped drive the prices up, and the spiral kept going up.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 21:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north/#IDComment150415601</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Looking north</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north/#IDComment150413851</link>
<description>If we only voted one one issue, one could argue that is the case. If so, that would be pretty sad.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 21:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north/#IDComment150413851</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Why did it take so long to get Osama?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/why-did-it-take-so-long/#IDComment150412356</link>
<description>This stuff is so much easier in hindsight. :) </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 21:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/why-did-it-take-so-long/#IDComment150412356</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The time is now</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/the-time-is-now/#IDComment150374781</link>
<description>You new, young, inexperienced MP&amp;#039;s - you are the ones who will fix Ottawa. That is kind of scary.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 18:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/the-time-is-now/#IDComment150374781</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Hey look: Maybe it&#039;s just a bunch of stuff that happened</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/hey-look-maybe-its-just-a-bunch-of-stuff-that-happened/#IDComment150374326</link>
<description>Paul - why&amp;#039;d ya go and tell me who won? I was waiting for my Maclean&amp;#039;s to come in the mail to find out. :) </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 18:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/hey-look-maybe-its-just-a-bunch-of-stuff-that-happened/#IDComment150374326</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Looking north</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north/#IDComment150373725</link>
<description>I think the crystal ball that you are seeing all of this in is pretty dirty. Might need to clean it off. :)  Blue Rodeo - I agree Trudeau - not so much.    </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 18:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north/#IDComment150373725</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Looking north</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north/#IDComment150373129</link>
<description>We will be pretty screwed as a country if only 40% of us want less taxes.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 18:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north/#IDComment150373129</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Looking north</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north/#IDComment150372687</link>
<description>Not similar at all. The states had a &amp;#039;sub prime&amp;#039; problem because they instituted a law that allowed &amp;#039;sub prime&amp;#039; lenders into the market. Some actually argue that it was a racist law. It allowed, actually it forced, lenders to allow people without the means to qualify for mortgages.   Allowing for longer term mortgages, or zero down mortgages, in and of themselves are not bad things. Allowing for 110% mortgages, or mortgages to people with bad/no credit, or no jobs is another thing entirely.  As house prices climb, we may need to look at these in the future.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 18:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north/#IDComment150372687</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Sun News Network&#039;s big mouths, small-town look</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/big-mouths-small-town-look/#IDComment150370984</link>
<description>I am sure the quality will improve, and we can all only benefit from another news source in Canada - whatever the slant. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 18:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/big-mouths-small-town-look/#IDComment150370984</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Looking north</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north/#IDComment150344709</link>
<description>My first thought was that Aaron was trying to tie Harper in with the Republican party. That would have been a funny attempt.   I actually think that it is kind of cool - having the Americans learn a thing or two from us. Seeing as how our economy is highly dependent on theirs, I would expect that we would all want there books to get in line in a hurry. Lets hope that someone gives Harper a call.  Nice how he stresses that Harper&amp;#039;s plan was to emphasize lower taxes, to win the election. After reading all the people posting on these blogs, I could have sworn that it was all won by attack ads aimed at MI. Nice to see someone give us, as voters, more credit than that.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 16:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north/#IDComment150344709</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Looking north</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north/#IDComment150342981</link>
<description>&amp;quot;I  will tax you less&amp;quot; is not similar to &amp;quot;I will tax others more and give you more&amp;quot;. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 16:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north/#IDComment150342981</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : How in God’s name do you explain?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/how-in-god%e2%80%99s-name-do-you-explain/#IDComment150341975</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Liberals, even when in opposition, are always surprised when they meet someone who isn&amp;#039;t a liberal. They tend to believe everyone looks at the world the way they do, everyone is on the same team.&amp;quot;  Brilliant. I have said this myself, and been criticized for it. The reason the Liberals lost is their almost total disconnection from reality. They (like anyone with an opinion) feel that they are right. The difference between them and others, is their belief that anyone who opposes their beliefs is uneducated/stupid/ignorant. Basically, they believe everyone will eventually end up thinking as they do.  Their fatal flaw is that they cannot comprehend that their opponents have well thought our opinions. They cannot understand their opponents beliefs as rational, and therefore dismiss anyone who holds the beliefs. I feel this is why conservatives seem to feel that the media is unfair to them. It is in the way that the conservative are &amp;#039;opposed&amp;#039; in the media. It has this idea, behind the stories, that only stupid people can think this way, and the reporter (obviously to themselves) is not stupid. The story sometimes has that feel to it. When liberals are &amp;#039;attacked&amp;#039; in the media, it is usually on policy or on something the person has said/done.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 16:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/how-in-god%e2%80%99s-name-do-you-explain/#IDComment150341975</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : &#039;We are all judged by it&#039;</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150334430</link>
<description>The next parliament will be &amp;#039;nicer&amp;#039; as it has a majority government, and less opportunity for brinkmanship. It will change, not because the players have changed, but because the dynamics have changed.   And certainly not because Glen asks for it.   As a side note, can we expect to not hear/see Justin as much this time around?  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 15:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150334430</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>