<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/315098</link>
		<description>Comments by modelcitizen</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : In Memoriam: Andrew Breitbart (1969-2012)</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/in-memoriam-andrew-breitbart-1969-2012/#IDComment305568377</link>
<description>hopefully they will release the long form death certificate so there is no confusion. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 16:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/in-memoriam-andrew-breitbart-1969-2012/#IDComment305568377</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : In Memoriam: Andrew Breitbart (1969-2012)</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/in-memoriam-andrew-breitbart-1969-2012/#IDComment305560145</link>
<description>All the more reason for liberals to not lower themselves to that level. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 16:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/in-memoriam-andrew-breitbart-1969-2012/#IDComment305560145</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : In Memoriam: Andrew Breitbart (1969-2012)</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/in-memoriam-andrew-breitbart-1969-2012/#IDComment305558888</link>
<description>Liberal here.  While I didn&amp;#039;t agree with Mr. Breitbart on any issues, it is a shame when anyone dies so young.    </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 16:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/in-memoriam-andrew-breitbart-1969-2012/#IDComment305558888</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : GOP\&#039;s health care repeal: Now for the hard part</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9KRUTA00&show_article=1#IDComment122524838</link>
<description>another futile attempt by the repubos.  they have no ideas and no plan for healthcare.  their in the pockets of the insurance companies. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9KRUTA00&show_article=1#IDComment122524838</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama approval rating jumps: poll</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.368dd86b8036db4006b87e3438898d63.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment122522264</link>
<description>article doesn&amp;#039;t say that.  go read it again real slow this time. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.368dd86b8036db4006b87e3438898d63.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment122522264</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama approval rating jumps: poll</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.368dd86b8036db4006b87e3438898d63.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment122522082</link>
<description>how is it socialism when we&amp;#039;re buying insurance from PRIVATE corporations still?  oh yeah, it isn&amp;#039;t! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.368dd86b8036db4006b87e3438898d63.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment122522082</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama approval rating jumps: poll</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.368dd86b8036db4006b87e3438898d63.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment122521825</link>
<description>and why would you hope that? oh fickleness.  I got it. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.368dd86b8036db4006b87e3438898d63.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment122521825</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama approval rating jumps: poll</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.368dd86b8036db4006b87e3438898d63.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment122521758</link>
<description>racist much? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.368dd86b8036db4006b87e3438898d63.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment122521758</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama approval rating jumps: poll</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.368dd86b8036db4006b87e3438898d63.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment122521690</link>
<description>That would be great if the only president in the recent years to NOT run up a deficit was Bill Clinton.  Reagan - DEFICITS, Bush I - DEFICITS, Bush II - DEFICITS. Clinton - SURPLUS.    Nothing was forced down your throat.  The requirement to make people buy insurance from private corporations is a republican idea because your side fought against the public option.  You got what you wanted yet still you cry about it.  Now thats pathetic! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.368dd86b8036db4006b87e3438898d63.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment122521690</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Krauthammer:  O&#039;Donnell Has 1 in 10 Chance</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/krauthammer-odonnell-has-1-in-10-chance/#IDComment106441756</link>
<description>oh I agree that those dems should be thrown in jail, but to use their&lt;br /&gt;past behavior as a benchmark for the Congress is flat out stupid. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/krauthammer-odonnell-has-1-in-10-chance/#IDComment106441756</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Krauthammer:  O&#039;Donnell Has 1 in 10 Chance</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/krauthammer-odonnell-has-1-in-10-chance/#IDComment106441698</link>
<description>oh I agree that those dems should be thrown in jail, but to use their&lt;br /&gt;past behavior as a benchmark for the Congress is flat out stupid. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/krauthammer-odonnell-has-1-in-10-chance/#IDComment106441698</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Krauthammer:  O&#039;Donnell Has 1 in 10 Chance</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/krauthammer-odonnell-has-1-in-10-chance/#IDComment99817102</link>
<description>No one is deny that she is likeable and she seems like a great person.&lt;br /&gt; What people like Newt and C. Krauthammer are saying is that she has&lt;br /&gt;some significant questions to answer, naming getting sued for not&lt;br /&gt;paying her tuition, her sketchy college record, her lack of income,&lt;br /&gt;her behavior in college, her personal use of campaign funds, and on&lt;br /&gt;and on...so again, its not that she isn&amp;#039;t a \&quot;likeable\&quot; person, its&lt;br /&gt;that she has a very shady past. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 22:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/krauthammer-odonnell-has-1-in-10-chance/#IDComment99817102</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Florida Senate Race May Be Impacted by New Book</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=xprnw.20100917.PH66628&amp;show_article=1#IDComment99382533</link>
<description>Its fiction.  Charlie has a chance. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=xprnw.20100917.PH66628&amp;show_article=1#IDComment99382533</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Krauthammer:  O&#039;Donnell Has 1 in 10 Chance</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/krauthammer-odonnell-has-1-in-10-chance/#IDComment99382368</link>
<description>FEC investigation is coming - all her shading dealings will come to light and she&amp;#039;ll be buried by Coons as the right wing nutjob that she is. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/krauthammer-odonnell-has-1-in-10-chance/#IDComment99382368</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Krauthammer:  O&#039;Donnell Has 1 in 10 Chance</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/krauthammer-odonnell-has-1-in-10-chance/#IDComment99382168</link>
<description>She is polling 11 points behind.  Its going to very hard ground to cover. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/krauthammer-odonnell-has-1-in-10-chance/#IDComment99382168</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>