<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/524819</link>
		<description>Comments by Matt Nefstead</description>
<item>
<title>Spark | CBC Radio : Starting this September, Spark gets a new timeslot and a new length</title>
<link>http://www.cbc.ca/spark/2009/05/starting-this-september-spark-gets-a-new-timeslot-and-a-new-length/#IDComment21775297</link>
<description>I think what you&amp;#039;re already doing is superb, and I&amp;#039;d just like to see more of the same. Perhaps you could go a bit more in depth on some of the interviews (there&amp;#039;s so much more content to be mined than what currently makes it into the show), but in general I agree that the current format of edited interviews is good for the flow of the show. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 19:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cbc.ca/spark/2009/05/starting-this-september-spark-gets-a-new-timeslot-and-a-new-length/#IDComment21775297</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Spark | CBC Radio : To soak or not-to-soak: Can sidetaker.com settle the debate?</title>
<link>http://www.cbc.ca/spark/2009/05/sidetakercom/#IDComment21774933</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m not sure I&amp;#039;d ever have the guts to post a private dispute for all the world to see, but it&amp;#039;s an interesting concept. And it&amp;#039;s fun to browse other people&amp;#039;s private disputes! Everyone loves the chance to share a bit of wisdom with others.  By the way, I voted &amp;quot;not to soak&amp;quot;. A 10 minute soak is fine, and I do that myself, but allowing dishes to accumulate in the sink makes cooking a frustrating chore. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cbc.ca/spark/2009/05/sidetakercom/#IDComment21774933</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Spark | CBC Radio : I Heart Old Tech.  Do you?</title>
<link>http://www.cbc.ca/spark/2009/04/i-heart-old-tech-do-you/#IDComment20388762</link>
<description>You don&amp;#039;t need to &amp;quot;need&amp;quot; a fountain pen for any particular activity in order to use one. If you ever write anything, you can do it with a fountain pen, and probably enjoy it more as a result!  I agree with you that much of today&amp;#039;s tech is sadly lacking in quality assurance. That doesn&amp;#039;t mean that all old tech is perfect, but it does seem to be built with longer-term usage in mind. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 May 2009 23:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cbc.ca/spark/2009/04/i-heart-old-tech-do-you/#IDComment20388762</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>