<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/549694</link>
		<description>Comments by mike417</description>
<item>
<title>/Film : Sam Raimi&#039;s Drag Me To Hell - What Did You Think?</title>
<link>http:/www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/29/sam-raimis-drag-me-to-hell-what-did-you-think/#IDComment22921946</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m kind of surprised how much I hated this movie. Going in I was expecting a pretty simple plot buoyed by Raimi&amp;#039;s slapsticky, wacky camera movement horror/comedy thing he&amp;#039;s been mining since Evil Dead 2.  Not surprisingly he didn&amp;#039;t disappoint on this end, delivering all the frenetic gross-out moments fans have come to love from his films, even if several scenes were marred by dated looking effects. Everything else fell flat though, from a predictable story filled with clumsy exposition to wooden acting from just about everyone involved, a fun performance from Lorna Raver being a notable exception.   Understandably Raimi has always embraced the corny side of things in much of his work, but even knowing this I just couldn&amp;#039;t go along for the ride this time. There were no surprises, nothing redeeming about the main characters to make me care about them and certainly no scares beyond cheap &amp;quot;gotcha&amp;quot; moments achieved by cranking up the volume and throwing something directly at the viewer. Just a lot of gags that were used to great comic effect twenty some odd years ago that aren&amp;#039;t nearly enough to carry a film today. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 18:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http:/www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/29/sam-raimis-drag-me-to-hell-what-did-you-think/#IDComment22921946</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Star Wars Turns 32 Years Old</title>
<link>http:/www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/25/star-wars-turns-32-years-old/#IDComment22281291</link>
<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/adjusted.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/adjusted.htm&lt;/a&gt;  Let&amp;#039;s not forget all those movies that sold quite a few tickets well before the 70&amp;#039;s and terms like blockbuster were coined.  But yeah, Star Wars definitely put the whole merchandising thing on the map. For better or worse ... </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 00:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http:/www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/25/star-wars-turns-32-years-old/#IDComment22281291</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : The Buzz: Terminator Salvation is Horrible OR a Solid Summer Action Movie</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/20/the-buzz-terminator-salvation-is-horrible-or-a-solid-summer-action-movie/#IDComment22178108</link>
<description>4/10  Yelchin and Worthington somehow rose above an awful script littered with some of the worst dialogue I&amp;#039;ve ever heard (&amp;quot;Now I know what death tastes like!?&amp;quot;), making me care just enough about their characters so that I didn&amp;#039;t fall asleep between action sequences. Speaking of which, the effects pieces were all well shot (no shaky cam bullshit) and the CGI convincing, so if that&amp;#039;s all you are looking for then you will probably have a great time with this one. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 14:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/20/the-buzz-terminator-salvation-is-horrible-or-a-solid-summer-action-movie/#IDComment22178108</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>