<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/264691</link>
		<description>Comments by mickc</description>
<item>
<title>Spamtacular : Oral arguments in e360 v. Spamhaus</title>
<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2011/06/09/oral-arguments-in-e360-v-spamhaus/#IDComment163046123</link>
<description>No, I&amp;#039;m thinking of Linhardt suing his own attorneys.  Judge Posner was quite clear that there are likely no damages, but it was still Linhardt&amp;#039;s burden to show that there was some basis in fact for an award of any amount.  Guiding Linhardt through that bit was the job of his attorneys, but they not only completely failed to do so, but completely failed to do so in a way that Judge Posner found not only incompetent, but &amp;quot;grotesque.&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.spamtacular.com/2011/06/09/oral-arguments-in-e360-v-spamhaus/#IDComment163046123</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Spamtacular : An Average Email User Responds</title>
<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2010/11/17/an-average-email-user-responds/#IDComment110290834</link>
<description>I think that we must listen to what customers say. When we stop listening to what they say and start assuming things that run counter to what they tell us because we THINK that their actions say something different, then we need to stop pretending that we respect our recipients at all.  While all analogies are poor, when we get to this point then we stand pretty much in the same place as the man on trial for sexual assault whose defense is &amp;quot;She said, &amp;#039;No,&amp;#039; but her body language said &amp;#039;YES!&amp;#039;&amp;quot;  It&amp;#039;s disrespectful to say that we can disregard what you&amp;#039;re saying because of how you&amp;#039;re acting or how you look. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.spamtacular.com/2010/11/17/an-average-email-user-responds/#IDComment110290834</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Spamtacular : The Most Wrong-Headed Thing I Have Read Today</title>
<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2010/11/16/the-most-wrong-headed-thing-i-have-read-today/#IDComment110287908</link>
<description>The point there is that your attitude is not &amp;quot;I don&amp;#039;t care either way.&amp;quot;  You do care, even if you don&amp;#039;t remember. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.spamtacular.com/2010/11/16/the-most-wrong-headed-thing-i-have-read-today/#IDComment110287908</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Spamtacular : What will not happen today</title>
<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2010/11/15/what-will-not-happen-today/#IDComment110118187</link>
<description>Yes, I am interested to see how this all plays out.    I&amp;#039;m also wondering if Facebook will provide a way for folks to monitor where their messages go so that they can do things like remove people who deprioritize them.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.spamtacular.com/2010/11/15/what-will-not-happen-today/#IDComment110118187</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Spamtacular : What will not happen today</title>
<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2010/11/15/what-will-not-happen-today/#IDComment110088981</link>
<description>Yes, it is true that they see lots of address churn.  However, I think that one of the things that people like about them is the ease with which new accounts are created.  Churn, at least, here does not necessarily translate to lost users. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.spamtacular.com/2010/11/15/what-will-not-happen-today/#IDComment110088981</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Spamtacular : Inertia is not email marketing</title>
<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2010/07/01/inertia-is-not-email-marketing/#IDComment83877996</link>
<description>You know, I figured I was missing something and leave it up to good people like you to help the rest of us remember.  Thanks! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Jul 2010 17:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.spamtacular.com/2010/07/01/inertia-is-not-email-marketing/#IDComment83877996</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Spamtacular : Inertia is not email marketing</title>
<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2010/07/01/inertia-is-not-email-marketing/#IDComment83873001</link>
<description>This is so important for people to know. Doing email marketing right is about constant evaluation. If you can&amp;#039;t figure out why people are not engaged by your efforts then you are doing something wrong.  Testing is the only way to see if your strategy is a good one.  Some tests are easy to do, some are hard, but you cannot let inertia dictate any part of your marketing efforts. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Jul 2010 17:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.spamtacular.com/2010/07/01/inertia-is-not-email-marketing/#IDComment83873001</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Spamtacular : It&#039;s easier to be angry than impressed</title>
<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2010/05/07/its-easier-to-be-angry-than-impressed/#IDComment73861681</link>
<description>You&amp;#039;re a real pal, Al. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 May 2010 19:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.spamtacular.com/2010/05/07/its-easier-to-be-angry-than-impressed/#IDComment73861681</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Spamtacular : It&#039;s easier to be angry than impressed</title>
<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2010/05/07/its-easier-to-be-angry-than-impressed/#IDComment73861428</link>
<description>Thanks!  What I&amp;#039;d really love to do is find some of those silent heroes and see what things we can learn from them.  That would make a great series of blog posts. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 May 2010 19:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.spamtacular.com/2010/05/07/its-easier-to-be-angry-than-impressed/#IDComment73861428</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Spamtacular : Which &quot;experts&quot; do you listen to?</title>
<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2010/03/31/which-experts-do-you-listen-to/#IDComment65043844</link>
<description>How about I get things started.  It&amp;#039;s hard to listen to myself, at least that&amp;#039;s what I&amp;#039;ll claim so I don&amp;#039;t get locked away in the loony bin.  Folks I talk to directly: Steve &amp;amp; Laura Atkins Al Iverson Annalivia Ford  Blogs that I try to read immediately (in addition to the blogs of the people I just mentioned) Box of Meat AOL Postmaster Prof. Eric Goldman Venkat&amp;#039;s Spam Notes John Levine Mark Brownlow Spam Diaries Spamhaus&amp;#039; News Blog Bronto Blog MailChimp&amp;#039;s Blog  And, of course, lots of folks on Twitter. I&amp;#039;ll point out KNLorenz specifically because several of her tweets have turned into or pointed me to material that&amp;#039;s become blog posts here. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.spamtacular.com/2010/03/31/which-experts-do-you-listen-to/#IDComment65043844</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Spamtacular : When is transactional mail not transactional anymore?</title>
<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/12/02/when-is-transactional-mail-not-transactional-anymore/#IDComment62615993</link>
<description>Without knowing more about what\\\&#039;s going on, my first thought is that this would be transactional mail, and not subject to the unsubscription requirements.  The unsubscription requirements only attach to commercial email.  So, if the mail that is being sent isn\\\&#039;t marketing anything, it\\\&#039;s probably okay. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/12/02/when-is-transactional-mail-not-transactional-anymore/#IDComment62615993</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Spamtacular : SORBS Closure Imminent</title>
<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/06/22/sorbs-closure-imminent/#IDComment55867619</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve never seen a lawsuit against a DNSBL, no matter how poorly run, work well, so that wouldn&amp;#039;t be any sort of suggested course of action.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/06/22/sorbs-closure-imminent/#IDComment55867619</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Spamtacular : IP relisted despite no more mail being sent</title>
<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/06/25/ip-relisted-despite-no-more-mail-being-sent/#IDComment25841337</link>
<description>That has been done, as I work for the ESP. The tracking domain is not on the list. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/06/25/ip-relisted-despite-no-more-mail-being-sent/#IDComment25841337</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Spamtacular : SORBS Closure Imminent</title>
<link>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/06/22/sorbs-closure-imminent/#IDComment25255019</link>
<description>That&amp;#039;s not how I recall it happening. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.spamtacular.com/2009/06/22/sorbs-closure-imminent/#IDComment25255019</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Intellectual Intercourse : Tag44: Spamming for jobs</title>
<link>http://mickc.whizardries.com/archives/2008/05/08/tag44-spamming-for-jobs/#IDComment23021498</link>
<description>Make sure you read &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/mickc.whizardries.com\/archives\/2009\/06\/01\/tag44-failing-at-astroturf\/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;new post&lt;/a&gt; regarding this reply. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Jun 2009 00:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://mickc.whizardries.com/archives/2008/05/08/tag44-spamming-for-jobs/#IDComment23021498</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Intellectual Intercourse : Tag44: Spamming for jobs</title>
<link>http://mickc.whizardries.com/archives/2008/05/08/tag44-spamming-for-jobs/#IDComment23021492</link>
<description>Make sure you read &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/mickc.whizardries.com\/archives\/2009\/06\/01\/tag44-failing-at-astroturf\/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;new post&lt;/a&gt; regarding this reply. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Jun 2009 00:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://mickc.whizardries.com/archives/2008/05/08/tag44-spamming-for-jobs/#IDComment23021492</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Intellectual Intercourse : Tag44: Spamming for jobs</title>
<link>http://mickc.whizardries.com/archives/2008/05/08/tag44-spamming-for-jobs/#IDComment23021480</link>
<description>Make sure you read &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/mickc.whizardries.com\/archives\/2009\/06\/01\/tag44-failing-at-astroturf\/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;new post&lt;/a&gt; regarding this reply. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Jun 2009 00:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://mickc.whizardries.com/archives/2008/05/08/tag44-spamming-for-jobs/#IDComment23021480</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>