<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/626436</link>
		<description>Comments by mgtmcki</description>
<item>
<title>Non-Profit Tech Blog : Republicans Issue Terrible RFP for Their Web Site</title>
<link>http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/republicans-issue-terrible-rfp-for-their-web-site#IDComment29936181</link>
<description>I find this article completely subjective.  Being ambitious and vague is outside the box.  If this RFP step is the first of a few back and fourths between &amp;quot;illusionary&amp;quot; wants, technical speaking and marketing, it could end having a great end result.  Besides, I have never heard of a successful RFP.  It&amp;#039;s an archaic &amp;quot;best&amp;quot; (mediocre) practice and obviously is too emotional by those who feel they know a good RFP vs. those that take a stab at creating one.  Bravo to at least recognizing the need for a redesign -- that&amp;#039;s most out of the box. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Aug 2009 13:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/republicans-issue-terrible-rfp-for-their-web-site#IDComment29936181</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>