<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/700879</link>
		<description>Comments by mccannte</description>
<item>
<title>European Telecom News From The Trenches : Feels like Carrier Under-Investment</title>
<link>http://mccanntelecom.com/feels-like-carrier-under-investment#IDComment46735574</link>
<description>Thanks for the complement!   Your domain tells me that you are part of the Thesis Theme development.  If so can we establish email communications?  I have a few questions about some of the features and about compensation ;-)  John  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://mccanntelecom.com/feels-like-carrier-under-investment#IDComment46735574</guid>
</item><item>
<title>European Telecom News From The Trenches : Ethernet Demarcation</title>
<link>http://mccanntelecom.com/ethernet-demarcation#IDComment44896653</link>
<description>Dom,  There are a number of companies who have gone down this route; MRV, Adva (with the Purchase of Cavarro), Atrica and Accedian.  They all differ in their approach and technology, however...  In the case of the Accedian, I would have to say that their most important features would be:  -one-way measurements on Ethernet (something that Mobile carriers love)  -Loopback capabilities on all logical interfaces (and classifications) Layers 2-4 -RFC 2544 full test suite, ensuring the service works prior to customer acceptance ;-)  I do think we&amp;#039;ll see a number of new companies getting into this game when 10Gig becomes more prevalent as a end-user service. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://mccanntelecom.com/ethernet-demarcation#IDComment44896653</guid>
</item><item>
<title>European Telecom News From The Trenches : Is OTN really the way forward?</title>
<link>http://demo.mccanntelecom.com/is-otn-really-the-way-forward#IDComment43121226</link>
<description>Fred, from a FEC perspective you&amp;#039;re absolutely right, increasing reach is obviously very useful.  I also do see the advantages of OTN from a multiservice grooming perspective in the long haul.    My main point here (obviously not made clearly ;-)) was to counter a number of Vendors claims that Metro/Access gear must evolve to be OTN compliant and to push OTN as a service delivery technology.  I just do not see the point of OTN in an IP/Ethernet based service network.  Now that I take a look at the post again, I didn&amp;#039;t do a good job of qualifying my statement. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 00:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://demo.mccanntelecom.com/is-otn-really-the-way-forward#IDComment43121226</guid>
</item><item>
<title>European Telecom News From The Trenches : SONET/SDH fading away?  Not anytime soon...</title>
<link>http://mccanntelecom.com/sonetsdh-fading-away-not-anytime-soon#IDComment42776976</link>
<description>Over the years I have learned that for any company to be successful in technology one must adopt the product set like one would adopt a child.  Eat, drink, sleep the product and the basic unique value of the product.....or Marc, in your words &amp;quot;tunnel view&amp;quot; ;-)  It&amp;#039;s what quite a few Tech Industry employees call &amp;quot;Drinking the Kool Aid&amp;quot; of their particular company.  Unfortunately this &amp;quot;kool-aid&amp;quot; mentality tends to eclipse the customers needs at times,  exactly as it did with me.  I was just as surprised as anyone that someone wanted SDH/SONET to stick around for the forseeable future ;-) </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://mccanntelecom.com/sonetsdh-fading-away-not-anytime-soon#IDComment42776976</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>