<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/567210</link>
		<description>Comments by mattling</description>
<item>
<title>Big Hollywood : ‘The Hurt Locker&#039;: Hollywood&#039;s Idea of ‘Not Political&#039;</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/06/12/%e2%80%98the-hurt-locker-hollywoods-idea-of-%e2%80%98not-political/#IDComment24100824</link>
<description>So you&amp;#039;re saying the movie&amp;#039;s being political by trying not to be? Thats a no-win argument. I think its pretty clear why the iraqis are portrayed in the manner described, because its a movie from the soldier&amp;#039;s POV. Maybe the guy in the beginning of the film who asked Eldridge &amp;#039;Where are you from?&amp;quot; was just counting coup. Maybe he was a terrorist. Maybe he was just the distraction. We don&amp;#039;t know because the soldiers don&amp;#039;t know.  Unfortunately, Bigelow is exactly the wrong kind of director to expect any kind of &amp;quot;humanization&amp;quot; story (K-19?) and any such attempt would be a jarring distraction from the film.  But I do get your point about the iraqis. They&amp;#039;re just as much of a nonentity to the left when it comes to politics.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/06/12/%e2%80%98the-hurt-locker-hollywoods-idea-of-%e2%80%98not-political/#IDComment24100824</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>