<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/363821</link>
		<description>Comments by marcyharris</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : AP source: ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268251379</link>
<description>HE is such an actor--pretending to cry on cue when talking about having to go to God for forgiveness.   </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 02:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268251379</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : AP source: ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268249982</link>
<description>Never beat Romney but has beaten Newt.  Santorum is a much better choice than Newt though he does have his ethics challenges too and was a big porky spender. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 02:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268249982</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : AP source: ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268249290</link>
<description>These guys with a zipper problem should realize they can&amp;#039;t kiss and tell and expect wifey to remain mum.  I&amp;#039;ll be she has more to say about his murcurial personality than just what we know about his mistreatment of women in general.  How could any woman vote for a man who is a womanizer and despises women so much that he uses them then tosses them away like dirty linen. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 02:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268249290</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : AP source: ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268247973</link>
<description>Romney has one wife and has been married to her for many years.  He has a very stable family and your little bigoted jab is NOT funny ronmadden. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 02:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268247973</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : AP source: ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268247286</link>
<description>The Bain thing was much worse than &amp;quot;they all do it!&amp;quot;  If you haven&amp;#039;t seen it, Fox did an interview with three of the people in that film (2 one time 1 another) and they all said they were totally misquoted by taking their words when they were talking about something else and making it look like it was about Bain.  If you haven&amp;#039;t seen this interview you need to check it out.  It should be actionable for lible. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 02:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268247286</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : AP source: ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268245816</link>
<description>I think it is relevant especially since this isn&amp;#039;t his only character flaw.  Ethics violations at home and in the House led to his being kicked out as Speaker and fined $300K for lying to Congress.    Simply too flawed for the Presidency and the instability of not being able to stick to a marriage or a religion (on number 3) or a story (on Bain) shows a very murcurial and undependable personality type.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 02:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268245816</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : AP source: ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268244187</link>
<description>Sorry--the facts are that the Dems clearly do not want Romney in the race.  He is the only candidate the D&amp;#039;s have spent huge capital on derailing in all five early primary states.  Besides, he is the only one running consistently even with or ahead of Obama.  Rasmussen showed him +6 over Obama this week but the others were at best -3 behind O.   &lt;a href=&quot;http://Hhttp://www.politico.com//blogs/burns-haberman/2012/01/gop-poll-romney-leads-obama-in-of-swing-states-111368.htmle&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Hhttp://www.politico.com//blogs/burns-haberman/2012/01/gop-poll-romney-leads-obama-in-of-swing-states-111368.htmle&lt;/a&gt; is ahead in almost all of the swing states.  MR is Obama&amp;#039;s nightmare.  Axelrod speaks of nothing else but MR. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 02:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268244187</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : AP source: ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268241360</link>
<description>Mitt, somewhat unfortunately, is too much of a gentleman to point out the very seamy nature of this evil and snarky little man, Newt.  As Peggy Noonan put it a couple of weeks ago:  Those who know and have worked with Mitt Romney are supporting him.  Those who have worked with Newt and know him well are not.  Mitt should run a Swift Boat type ad with the members of Congress when Newt was/ then wasn&amp;#039;t speaker to let us know who bad this guy really is.  As one contemporary put it, &amp;quot;He has lots of ideas, but the attention span of a three year old to carry anything out.&amp;quot;  Also, a lot of his ideas are hairbrained--not well thought through. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 02:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268241360</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : AP source: ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268237926</link>
<description>No one gave Cain the chance to refute line by line what his mistresses said.  Let&amp;#039;s face it the real flip flopper in this race is Newt Gingrich.  He flipped from his sick wives bed into that of his mistress(s?) and then he flopped into bed with his second wife but she got ill too--can&amp;#039;t have that so he flipped again into the bed of his mistress(s?) and that resulted in his eventual marriage to the scarlet woman in the third part--Callista to whom he is still married and for whom he buys tons of jewels at Tiffany&amp;#039;s to keep her.  He also flipped and flopped from one religion to another looking yet again for a church that would validate his serial wifery and his ethical malfeasance.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 02:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268237926</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Rasmussen: Romney, Santorum Lead in South Carolina</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/06/rasmussen-romney-santorum-lead-in-south-carolina/#IDComment261896174</link>
<description>The He in Tyrant&amp;#039;s post is Santorum--Not Romney.  Santorum lost his bid for returning to his seat by 7000000votes and how on earth does he think he can win nation wide when he can&amp;#039;t even win his own home state where he is an incumbent? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 03:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/06/rasmussen-romney-santorum-lead-in-south-carolina/#IDComment261896174</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Rasmussen: Romney, Santorum Lead in South Carolina</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/06/rasmussen-romney-santorum-lead-in-south-carolina/#IDComment261891918</link>
<description>Any differences between Mitt Romney and Barak Obama?    Truthfully I can&amp;#039;t think of any similarities.   </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 03:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/06/rasmussen-romney-santorum-lead-in-south-carolina/#IDComment261891918</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Rasmussen: Romney, Santorum Lead in South Carolina</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/06/rasmussen-romney-santorum-lead-in-south-carolina/#IDComment261886410</link>
<description>Only bigots can keep Mitt Romney from being the next president and insure that the honor goes to Obama!  Better decide to go for Romney (who is also a Bible guy--that would be King James version)  or let your bigotry give us four more of Obama). </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 03:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/06/rasmussen-romney-santorum-lead-in-south-carolina/#IDComment261886410</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Rasmussen: Romney, Santorum Lead in South Carolina</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/06/rasmussen-romney-santorum-lead-in-south-carolina/#IDComment261883652</link>
<description>The anti-Obama candidate is obviously Romney--look at the polls.  He is the only one in poll after poll coming equal to or ahead of Obama.  The others--well they lage behind him by many points in all but a very few poills.  Romney is Obama&amp;#039;s worst fear--why else would the D&amp;#039;s be running anti-Romney ads in all the 5 early primary states and no other candidates get the honor.  This is not good! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 02:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/06/rasmussen-romney-santorum-lead-in-south-carolina/#IDComment261883652</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Rasmussen: Romney, Santorum Lead in South Carolina</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/06/rasmussen-romney-santorum-lead-in-south-carolina/#IDComment261882375</link>
<description>Right.  Even Harry Reid said (see You Tube) that earmarks keep funding for local projects distributed per our constitution (why we have reps from all states to balance out their indluence).  He said, &amp;quot;Obama has enough power.  He doesn&amp;#039;t need additional power&amp;quot; when speaking of the former earmark money going to Obama to distribute directly to agencies under control of his czars.    You guys who wanted to get rid of earmarks had your eyes tightly closed. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 02:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/06/rasmussen-romney-santorum-lead-in-south-carolina/#IDComment261882375</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Rasmussen: Romney, Santorum Lead in South Carolina</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/06/rasmussen-romney-santorum-lead-in-south-carolina/#IDComment261880645</link>
<description>Not so.  He is running well ahead of all our candidates but Romney in the polls.  He has the unions behind him.  ACORN in all its iterations and all those illegal voters (and dead ones) Chicago style.  We must have MItt or regret the fall of our nation as Obama follows his curent pattern of ignoring congress and making all decisions where he can&amp;#039;t get his way legally by fiat.  A vote for anyone but Romney is a vote for Obama and the end of America as we know it.  Not exagerating. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 02:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/06/rasmussen-romney-santorum-lead-in-south-carolina/#IDComment261880645</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Rasmussen: Romney, Santorum Lead in South Carolina</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/06/rasmussen-romney-santorum-lead-in-south-carolina/#IDComment261878623</link>
<description>Sitting out is the same as going to the poll to vote for Obama--coward!  Romney will make a great president.  He showed his conservative capability when he turned a $3B deficit in Mass into a $2B surplus.  He is a man of great executive strenght and ability.  Sit it out and endure 4 more years of Obama and, as some in Congress are saying, there may not even be an election in another four years as Obama is now flagrantly flaunting his ability to do what he wishes by executive decree or by czars in all the agencies.  Stop this man.  Vote Mitt--the only one with a real chance at victory.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 02:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/06/rasmussen-romney-santorum-lead-in-south-carolina/#IDComment261878623</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Rasmussen: Romney, Santorum Lead in South Carolina</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/06/rasmussen-romney-santorum-lead-in-south-carolina/#IDComment261876818</link>
<description>That bandwagon took a fatal detour in NH.  Not likely to get back on track any time soon now his corrupt nature is coming out into public view.  Look at his statement now on You Tube of &amp;quot;loving earmarks.&amp;quot;  He was an earmark king.  If you think only being pro-life makes him a conservative I have news for you.  Many of us in the T-party want a fiscal conservative.  He is not.  We want someone who can win. He couldn&amp;#039;teven win in his home state of PA and the Obama machine would eat him alive.  Don&amp;#039;t vote for who you &amp;quot;like.&amp;quot; (He looks cute and harmless in his little sweater vests).  Please vote for the man who can win and the polls repeatedly show that the only one (recent Rasmussen showed a 5+ for Romney with all the rest of the pack well behind Romney) is Mitt Romney and he will have a dog fight on his hands.   </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 02:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/06/rasmussen-romney-santorum-lead-in-south-carolina/#IDComment261876818</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Rasmussen: Romney, Santorum Lead in South Carolina</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/06/rasmussen-romney-santorum-lead-in-south-carolina/#IDComment261873414</link>
<description>I think more likely will be Romney and Paul based on NH and polls.  Gingrich is doing pretty well in the South (they always did like to turn a blind eye to ones political and personal indiscretions as long as they have &amp;quot;made their peace with God&amp;quot; by their own declaration).    Gingrich, who is on his third marriage and his third religion (now Catholic) and who lost his seat in Congress for ethics violations (wish they weren&amp;#039;t sealed) and then got fined $300K for lying to Congress.  If you or I had done what he did we&amp;#039;d probably still be in prison.  The South likes the likes of &amp;quot;Boss Hogg&amp;quot; whose looks and corrupt nature match Gingrich completely.  (For those of you old enough to remember &amp;quot;Boss Hogg&amp;quot; in the &amp;quot;Dukes of Hazard&amp;quot; series).  The South likes their head men pius and corrupt.  Clinton??? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 02:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/06/rasmussen-romney-santorum-lead-in-south-carolina/#IDComment261873414</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Rasmussen: Romney, Santorum Lead in South Carolina</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/06/rasmussen-romney-santorum-lead-in-south-carolina/#IDComment261868702</link>
<description>Usually would agree, but upon analysis the reason Santorum is scandalized is that his performance has been scandalous.  Look at the record and not at the left marginalization.  It speaks volumes that prove this guy is a big government guy who happens to have said he is pro-life.    Can he beat Obama?  Not on your life so that is why the D&amp;#039;s have only been pushing anti-Romney ads in all the 5 early states.  They don&amp;#039;t want to run against him.  They will be gleeful if they get Santorum who even all you &amp;quot;anyone but Romney&amp;quot; bigots left at the bottom of the heap until one by one the others went up &amp;quot;like rockets&amp;quot; (per Huckabee) and &amp;quot;fell like rocks&amp;quot; (Huckabe again).  Santorum just was never vetted before the election cycle hit.  Kind of did the Rock thing in New Hampshire though once some things about him were finally made known. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 02:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/06/rasmussen-romney-santorum-lead-in-south-carolina/#IDComment261868702</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Rasmussen: Romney, Santorum Lead in South Carolina</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/06/rasmussen-romney-santorum-lead-in-south-carolina/#IDComment261865399</link>
<description>Santorum is a big government guy famous for his statement that he &amp;quot;loves earmarks&amp;quot; for which his crony capitalism was famous ie those who contributed to his campaign goe money in earmarks.  He and two others were named the three most corrupt of legislators.  Check out the pay for play!  Maybe that  coming to light is one of the reasons he lost his seat as a two term incumbent in his own state by 7000000 votes.  Does anyone really think he or any other candidate besides Romney (who is the only one who consistently polls ahead of Obama) can win this general election.  Don&amp;#039;t be fooled by his Mr. Rogers sweaters. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 02:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/06/rasmussen-romney-santorum-lead-in-south-carolina/#IDComment261865399</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>