<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/702634</link>
		<description>Comments by manga76</description>
<item>
<title>Antiwar Newswire : Analysis: Iran in no hurry to cut nuclear deal</title>
<link>http://wire.antiwar.com/2009/11/02/analysis-iran-in-no-hurry-to-cut-nuclear-deal-2/#IDComment41628800</link>
<description>quote &amp;quot;Before the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Iran says it made a deal with France for a 10 percent stake in a nuclear plant and was expected to receive 50 tons of UF-6 gas, which can be turned into enriched uranium. But Iran claims it never received even a gram.&amp;quot;unquote  Brian, How do you still manage in Nov 2009 (30 years later)  to write as  a Journalist that &amp;quot;Iran claims&amp;quot; as if to invalidate/dilute the iran point of view. The &amp;quot;Iran Claim&amp;quot; as you write can be investigated for the enlightenment of your readers at the following web pages: &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/France%E2%80%93Iran_relations&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/France%E2%80%93Iran_...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurodif&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurodif&lt;/a&gt; From the information gathered you can build up your own investigation and one day, may be you would understand why the iranians don&amp;#039;t want to trust the French. Regards  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wire.antiwar.com/2009/11/02/analysis-iran-in-no-hurry-to-cut-nuclear-deal-2/#IDComment41628800</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>