<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/2639128</link>
		<description>Comments by mamapjs</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Maher To Limbaugh: I Can Call Palin C**t, &#039;I Don&#039;t Have Sponsors - I&#039;m on HBO&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/maher-to-limbaugh-i-can-call-palin-ct-i-dont-have-sponsors-im-on-hbo/#IDComment307724686</link>
<description>Fluke was asking for insurance providers to cover FREE contraception.  You and I pay for those &amp;quot;freebies&amp;quot; in the cost of our premiums.    There Ain&amp;#039;t No Such Thing As A Free Lunch.  TANSTAAFL!!! </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 4 Mar 2012 11:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/maher-to-limbaugh-i-can-call-palin-ct-i-dont-have-sponsors-im-on-hbo/#IDComment307724686</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Alan Dershowitz Declares War On Media Matters</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/27/alan-dershowitz-declares-war-on-media-matters/#IDComment303619859</link>
<description>No, Fascism is definitely the government STRICTLY controlling corporations. Sorry-- I didn&amp;#039;t make up the rules for defining economic systems, and you don&amp;#039;t get to, either.   BTW, who &amp;quot;counts&amp;quot; your votes is up to YOUR county. We use old-fashioned page scanners, late- &amp;#039;50s technology the old multiple-choice tests were based upon, too stupid to &amp;quot;rig&amp;quot;, and with both a computer count of votes AND a hard copy of the ballot. Diebold doesn&amp;#039;t make those. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/27/alan-dershowitz-declares-war-on-media-matters/#IDComment303619859</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Alan Dershowitz Declares War On Media Matters</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/27/alan-dershowitz-declares-war-on-media-matters/#IDComment303410849</link>
<description>He is correct.  The only difference between Fascists and Communists is that Fascists allow private business to operate under STRICT government control.  Sound familiar?  The totalitarian part is a result of the rules put in place to support the basic idiology.  It adds up to the same result.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 05:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/27/alan-dershowitz-declares-war-on-media-matters/#IDComment303410849</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Alan Dershowitz Declares War On Media Matters</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/27/alan-dershowitz-declares-war-on-media-matters/#IDComment303401362</link>
<description>If she had SAID, &amp;quot;What saith the White House?&amp;quot; you would probably be attacking her as a fundamentalist religion freak for using Old English.   &amp;quot;What says the White House?&amp;quot; is OK. Not great, but this is a conversational board, not a dissertation.   BTW, HiredMind is right... if you&amp;#039;re going to correct someone&amp;#039;s Old English spelling/grammar, at least SPELL it right. &amp;quot;Saith&amp;quot;.  Otherwise, don&amp;#039;t make an anal idiot of yourself. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 05:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/27/alan-dershowitz-declares-war-on-media-matters/#IDComment303401362</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum On Obama: &#039;What A Snob&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-on-obama-what-a-snob/#IDComment302674594</link>
<description>Don&amp;#039;t give up yet.  You&amp;#039;re talking about mere moderates... I know dedicated DEMOCRATS who will vote for a turnip before they&amp;#039;ll vote for Obama again.  Stop biting your nails... barring outright vote fraud, things will turn out. :)  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-on-obama-what-a-snob/#IDComment302674594</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum On Obama: &#039;What A Snob&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-on-obama-what-a-snob/#IDComment302666921</link>
<description>Ah.  Excellent. :) </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-on-obama-what-a-snob/#IDComment302666921</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Liberal Tactics: Just Lie, No One Will Check!</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/wthuston/2012/02/26/liberal-tactics-just-lie-no-one-will-check/#IDComment302528026</link>
<description>This was a skit, more or less, for a political meeting. It was the LEFT who pulled it up out of obivion and made a hit of it. :) </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/wthuston/2012/02/26/liberal-tactics-just-lie-no-one-will-check/#IDComment302528026</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Liberal Tactics: Just Lie, No One Will Check!</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/wthuston/2012/02/26/liberal-tactics-just-lie-no-one-will-check/#IDComment302527115</link>
<description>re:  &amp;quot; It&amp;#039;s nonsense like this that helped get Chairman O elected...&amp;quot;  Which is exactly why they do it.  As long as they keep repeating the same old, same old over and over and over, there are people out there who believe them.  Have you ever noticed how few Black people know that the Civil Right Act and the Voting Rights Act were both Republican bills?   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/wthuston/2012/02/26/liberal-tactics-just-lie-no-one-will-check/#IDComment302527115</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Nancy Pelosi: Vicar of Contraception </title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jdeangelis/2012/02/26/nancy-pelosi-vicar-of-contraception/#IDComment302470175</link>
<description>re: &amp;quot;You want to punish Pelosi, help who ever is running against her next year win, and quit wasting your time wringing your hands over the Church.&amp;quot;   Talk about a waste of time... Pelosi&amp;#039;s district is San Francisco, the nuttiest district in the nuttiest state in the Union. NO successful politician from there is going to be somehow &amp;quot;better&amp;quot; than Queen Kook.  Besides, we need to keep her around for a while, as a good example of a bad example. ;) </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 03:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jdeangelis/2012/02/26/nancy-pelosi-vicar-of-contraception/#IDComment302470175</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Matthews: Media Rooting For Santorum</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/matthews-media-rooting-for-santorum/#IDComment301817996</link>
<description>So we have taxation without representation yet again, considering the &amp;quot;leadership&amp;quot; in the one house of Congress where we have a majority. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 06:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/matthews-media-rooting-for-santorum/#IDComment301817996</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Romney, Santorum Neck-And-Neck In Michigan</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-neck-and-neck-in-michigan/#IDComment301810277</link>
<description>Oh, pleeeeeeeeeease... at this point, Ron Paul is only acting as a spoiler, like the Little Handgrenade with the bad haircut who gave us Clinton.   </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 06:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-neck-and-neck-in-michigan/#IDComment301810277</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Romney, Santorum Neck-And-Neck In Michigan</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-neck-and-neck-in-michigan/#IDComment301809215</link>
<description>Santorum has already won, in a way.  Romney was supposed to walk away with Michigan.  Santorum has made his presence felt. :)   </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 06:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-neck-and-neck-in-michigan/#IDComment301809215</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum On Obama: &#039;What A Snob&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-on-obama-what-a-snob/#IDComment301791960</link>
<description>Who cares?   I don&amp;#039;t support Romney because he&amp;#039;s a RINO, John McCain&amp;#039;s TweedleDee/TweedleDum twin. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 05:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-on-obama-what-a-snob/#IDComment301791960</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum On Obama: &#039;What A Snob&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-on-obama-what-a-snob/#IDComment301791056</link>
<description>Uh... Santorum hasn&amp;#039;t said one frikkin&amp;#039; word about &amp;quot;banning contraceptives&amp;quot;, and neither has anyone else that I&amp;#039;m aware of. We don&amp;#039;t want to BAN them. You can do whatever you want in your bedroom. I just don&amp;#039;t want to PAY for it, either through my taxes or my insurance premium costs. Insisting that insurance companies give them out &amp;quot;free&amp;quot; is forcing me to pay for them in my premium expense.  There&amp;#039;s no such thing as &amp;quot;free&amp;quot;.  TANSTAAFL.  I agree with OldWoman, too, that &amp;quot;preach on, brother&amp;quot; is just an expression in the South. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 05:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-on-obama-what-a-snob/#IDComment301791056</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Romney, Santorum Neck-And-Neck In Michigan</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-neck-and-neck-in-michigan/#IDComment301738095</link>
<description>Which makes one wonder what the media has &amp;quot;got&amp;quot; on Romney that would make them want to set him up at the GOP nominee.   Cynical, I know, but we saw this in 2008. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 03:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-neck-and-neck-in-michigan/#IDComment301738095</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Romney, Santorum Neck-And-Neck In Michigan</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-neck-and-neck-in-michigan/#IDComment301736581</link>
<description>Not really.  Romney was ALWAYS going to &amp;quot;win in Michigan&amp;quot;.  He was supposed to take Michigan in a sweep.  This is the reason the current tie is news.  You see, Romney&amp;#039;s father, George Romney, was governor of Michigan back when I lived in the Detroit area in the mid-60s.  The name recognition by itself is high, plus George Romney was a good governor who I remember as personable and popular.  Romney SHOULD be getting through on his dad&amp;#039;s coattails along with the fact that Mitt pretty much grew up in Michigan.  Michigan is his REAL &amp;quot;home state&amp;quot;.  THAT is the reason this tie is news.   </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 03:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-neck-and-neck-in-michigan/#IDComment301736581</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Algae-Based Biofuels: More of President Obama&#039;s Green Cronyism</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/wpitcher/2012/02/25/algae-based-biofuels-more-of-president-obamas-green-cronyism/#IDComment301708581</link>
<description>Well, we can look at Europe where a lot of the new technologies are failing.  Wind turbines have a nasty tendency to freeze up in cold weather, and so they end up falling back on fossil fuel power plants.  Solar cells get covered by snow and need people out there to clear them off.  Meanwhile, the power is down, again, they have to rely on fossil fuel backup.  The UK alone has spent billions to get alternative energies online, and are still getting less than 10% of their power from them.  The reason is because they don&amp;#039;t work very well.  The technology isn&amp;#039;t &amp;quot;there&amp;quot; yet.   </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 02:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/wpitcher/2012/02/25/algae-based-biofuels-more-of-president-obamas-green-cronyism/#IDComment301708581</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Algae-Based Biofuels: More of President Obama&#039;s Green Cronyism</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/wpitcher/2012/02/25/algae-based-biofuels-more-of-president-obamas-green-cronyism/#IDComment301696480</link>
<description>I completely agree.  My city draws a large part of it&amp;#039;s power from a nuke, and my power bills are still reasonable, even with the percentage of fossil fuels making up the rest.  There is simply no reason to raise the price on the steady flow of power from the nuke.   </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 02:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/wpitcher/2012/02/25/algae-based-biofuels-more-of-president-obamas-green-cronyism/#IDComment301696480</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : A Budget Proposal Endorsed by Jesus Christ...Or Robin Hood?</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/cfacf/2012/02/19/a-budget-proposal-endorsed-by-jesus-christ-or-robin-hood/#IDComment298794302</link>
<description>True, that. Further, back in those days, the only non-rich who had anything to be taxed away were the tradesmen and merchants. THEY were the ones who were being targeted by the Sheriff of Nottingham.   Sound familiar? And they claim that there&amp;#039;s something &amp;quot;progressive&amp;quot; about socialistic ideals. Seems like the same old Feudal system to me! </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 07:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/cfacf/2012/02/19/a-budget-proposal-endorsed-by-jesus-christ-or-robin-hood/#IDComment298794302</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Of Profits and Power: Education Establishment Attacks Digital Learning</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/kolson/2012/02/20/of-profits-and-power-education-establishment-attacks-digital-learning/#IDComment297800433</link>
<description>Those parents have the piece of paper that SAYS they&amp;#039;re educated, but are they educated?   I started college about 10 years later than most in my (Boomer) generation, and found myself head and shoulders above my classmates. In my school district, in 1966, a class in the US Constitution was a REQUIREMENT for seniors to graduate. I encountered college classmates who had never even read it.  The same was true for a number of other classes that were required in the &amp;#039;60s.  Some students are gifted mathematicians, and some are gifted artists. Then there&amp;#039;s the gang who sail through college, nodding at the profs and doing the assignments the way the prof wants them done. Are THOSE people really &amp;quot;educated&amp;quot;, or do they just have a piece of paper saying they went through the motions? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 07:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/kolson/2012/02/20/of-profits-and-power-education-establishment-attacks-digital-learning/#IDComment297800433</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>