<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/709305</link>
		<description>Comments by maklp</description>
<item>
<title>Big Government : Forcing Us to Buy Health Insurance Is Not the Same as Mandatory Car Insurance</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/gknapp/2009/11/11/forcing-us-to-buy-health-insurance-is-not-the-same-as-mandatory-car-insurance/#IDComment42855594</link>
<description>Here&amp;#039;s the fundamental issue I see with the author&amp;#039;s logic.  If someone elects to not buy car insurance, yet persists to drive and then gets in an accident with me, I (or my insurance company) has legal recourse to pursue reparations from the uninsured driver.   In the case of an uninsured individual who has a medical problem, I and other insured individuals often pay for the individual to get emergency medical care.   Unlike the case of car insurance, I have no legal recourse to persue reparations, even though the uninsured patient is harming me (and most of you) economically.      Until someone can guarantee me that I won&amp;#039;t be subsidizing uninsured medical patients, then I absolutely think it defensible to require everybody be insured.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/gknapp/2009/11/11/forcing-us-to-buy-health-insurance-is-not-the-same-as-mandatory-car-insurance/#IDComment42855594</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>