<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/797869</link>
		<description>Comments by macnvettes</description>
<item>
<title>Big Government : Why Many Young People Love Ron Paul and Why Many Older People Despise Him</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/nsorrentino/2012/02/04/why-many-young-people-love-ron-paul-and-why-many-older-people-despise-him/#IDComment284203218</link>
<description>Would people stop harping about the gold standard already??????  Let&amp;#039;s look at what happens with a supposedly stable currency based on gold:  since money is a way to exchange units of labor and over time, more labor is produced through both work force expansion and automation/efficiency gains, the supply of money must necessarily increase over time at a rate more quickly than any one country can accumulate new gold to back the currency.  This means one of 2 things must happen: either massive deflation because much more labor is getting paid for by the same amount of gold, or constant re-valuing of currency against gold as the amount of circulating money necessarily increases to avoid deflation (this is what historically happens).  Both of those solutions defeat the stated purpose of having a gold standard.  Fiat currencies are therefore necessary because no physical currency has actual value (gold is only worth what one person will pay for it, you can&amp;#039;t eat it and it is not essential to life), portability, preservability, and abundance necessary to be a true currency.  Therefore, all currency is valued based on the faith in the government backing the currency.  The only perceived benefit of a gold standard that makes any sense is that the congress has to take a vote on how to re-value currency against gold.  The way to do this with a fiat currency is to abolish the Fed and make congress vote every time they increase the money supply. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 5 Feb 2012 03:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/nsorrentino/2012/02/04/why-many-young-people-love-ron-paul-and-why-many-older-people-despise-him/#IDComment284203218</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Breaking: Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords to Step Down This Week</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/22/breaking-congresswoman-gabrielle-giffords-to-step-down-this-week/#IDComment271578339</link>
<description>How about Wilson?  His wife signed bills with his hand while he was incapacitated!  Each of those laws should have been immediately invalidated! </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/22/breaking-congresswoman-gabrielle-giffords-to-step-down-this-week/#IDComment271578339</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Breaking: Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords to Step Down This Week</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/22/breaking-congresswoman-gabrielle-giffords-to-step-down-this-week/#IDComment271577737</link>
<description>Well, maybe we can get a candidate who can use his or her whole brain..... </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/22/breaking-congresswoman-gabrielle-giffords-to-step-down-this-week/#IDComment271577737</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : New York Democrat: Voter Fraud Is &#039;A Normal Political Tactic&#039;</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/rweiss/2012/01/19/new-york-democrat-voter-fraud-is-a-normal-political-tactic/#IDComment269267447</link>
<description>Unfortunately, incarcerating these people will only allow them to &amp;quot;talk shop&amp;quot; with fellow criminals and emerge with a better strategy.  They should all be permanently barred from ever holding any elected or appointed government position ever again. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 04:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/rweiss/2012/01/19/new-york-democrat-voter-fraud-is-a-normal-political-tactic/#IDComment269267447</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Wall Street Journal Confirms Accused Occupier Rapist Allowed to Sleep at Occupied Church</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/lstranahan/2012/01/12/wall-street-journal-confirms-accused-occupier-rapist-allowed-to-sleep-at-occupied-church/#IDComment262984786</link>
<description>The homeless SHOULD sleep in the churches, you know, charity work &amp;quot;blessed are the poor&amp;quot; and all?  If the homeless are sent back to the streets in favor of political protesters, then churches have abandoned their mission and have become nothing more than a political organization, and should therefore be stripped of any tax-exempt status. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 07:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/lstranahan/2012/01/12/wall-street-journal-confirms-accused-occupier-rapist-allowed-to-sleep-at-occupied-church/#IDComment262984786</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Wednesday Open Thread: Iowa Edition</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/28/wednesday-open-thread-iowa-edition/#IDComment249515726</link>
<description>Love thy neighbor, Christian style:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/clergymen-clash-bethlehem-birthplace-jesus-151107022.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://news.yahoo.com/clergymen-clash-bethlehem-b...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 21:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/28/wednesday-open-thread-iowa-edition/#IDComment249515726</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Boston Globe Calls for Ban on Congressional Insider Trading</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/whall/2011/12/27/boston-globe-calls-for-ban-on-congressional-insider-trading/#IDComment248781883</link>
<description>This is commonsense regulation, treat Congresspeople like normal citizens in the eyes of the law, which is a founding constitutional principle, no kings or nobility.  The problem is that Congresspeople would have to impose the rules upon themselves.....NOT GONNA HAPPEN. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 21:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/whall/2011/12/27/boston-globe-calls-for-ban-on-congressional-insider-trading/#IDComment248781883</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : VA GOP Changed Ballot Access Rules Last Month</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/26/va-gop-changed-ballot-access-rules-last-month/#IDComment248199565</link>
<description>One state does not a presidential candidate make.  What this should do is be a wake-up call to Perry and Gingrich that their organizations are failing them.  I mean, come on, Santorum and Bachmann qualify??  They do not have near the support that Perry or Gingrich do.  This means that these 2 candidates have done themselves a disservice by having poor organizations. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 03:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/26/va-gop-changed-ballot-access-rules-last-month/#IDComment248199565</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Christmas Open Thread</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/25/merry-christmas-edition/#IDComment247249349</link>
<description>Funny story of the day.  The Pope, a.k.a. the &amp;quot;King of Bling&amp;quot; bashes &amp;quot;superficial glitter&amp;quot; during the holidays:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/pope-laments-christmas-consumerism-glitter-215615750.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://news.yahoo.com/pope-laments-christmas-cons...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 23:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/25/merry-christmas-edition/#IDComment247249349</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : The Left&#039;s War on the Second Amendment Continues as Gun Sales Skyrocket</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/dwohl/2011/12/23/the-lefts-war-on-the-second-amendment-continues-as-guns-sales-skyrocket/#IDComment245788334</link>
<description>How about we compare places in the U.S. with wildly different gun control laws.  Care to hazard a guess which ones have the higher crime rates (hint: it ain&amp;#039;t the cities that ban guns!). </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 23:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/dwohl/2011/12/23/the-lefts-war-on-the-second-amendment-continues-as-guns-sales-skyrocket/#IDComment245788334</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : The Left&#039;s War on the Second Amendment Continues as Gun Sales Skyrocket</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/dwohl/2011/12/23/the-lefts-war-on-the-second-amendment-continues-as-guns-sales-skyrocket/#IDComment245786518</link>
<description>&amp;quot;The FBI does not track actual gun sales&amp;quot;......yeah, right, I&amp;#039;m not believing that line of crap!  I used to live in Virginia, where they aren&amp;#039;t supposed to retain ANY long gun sales records.  it didn&amp;#039;t stop me from getting a call 3 years after the fact from VA Beach PD after a rifle that I had re-sold was seized in a drug bust! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 23:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/dwohl/2011/12/23/the-lefts-war-on-the-second-amendment-continues-as-guns-sales-skyrocket/#IDComment245786518</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Top Ten Democrats Who Would Be Better Presidential Candidates Than Barack Obama in 2012</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jpollak/2011/12/22/top-ten-democrats-who-would-be-better-presidential-candidates-than-obama-in-2012/#IDComment245066987</link>
<description>Honestly????? Is the Republican field this weak that we post a list of Dems that we&amp;#039;d rather see than the blunderer in chief?????? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 02:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jpollak/2011/12/22/top-ten-democrats-who-would-be-better-presidential-candidates-than-obama-in-2012/#IDComment245066987</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Breaking: Copy of ATF Email Wanting More Gun Control in Wake of Fast and Furious</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/awrhawkins/2011/12/15/breaking-copy-of-atf-email-wanting-more-gun-control-in-wake-of-fast-and-furious/#IDComment238485283</link>
<description>I knew my stockpiling would pay off....... </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/awrhawkins/2011/12/15/breaking-copy-of-atf-email-wanting-more-gun-control-in-wake-of-fast-and-furious/#IDComment238485283</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Why I&#039;m Stepping Down from GOProud Advisory Council</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2011/12/10/why-im-stepping-down-from-goproud-advisory-council/#IDComment236653715</link>
<description>Actually, I do not construe marriage as a right, to be honest, can anything that you must obtain a state license to do be considered a right?  It is a privilege granted by INDIVIDUAL STATES, which is why STATES ISSUE MARRIAGE LICENSES, not the federal government.  Currently each state regulates whether or not they allow homosexual marriages or civil unions, or both, just as each state has different standards for what is considered incest, the punishments for incest, laws against polygamy and beastiality.  All of these are STATE LAWS, the only thing that the federal government decided to regulate is homosexual marriage (unconstitutionally, I might add by the 10th amendment).  By the full faith and credit clause of article 4, all states must honor contracts made in other states, therefore, constitutionally, a gay marriage or civil union made in one state must be honored in all states.  Therefore, constitutionally you DO NOT have to marry someone of the opposite sex, you merely have to attain a civil union or gay marriage in a state that offers one, and you are good to go in any state as guaranteed by the constitution. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2011/12/10/why-im-stepping-down-from-goproud-advisory-council/#IDComment236653715</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Et Tu, Beck? - Part III: Erratic Multimedia Star Pulls Race Card Again</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236207578</link>
<description>I never claimed to dispute Gingrich on this, just pointing out that there are some very obvious policy differences between Gingrich and Obama. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 03:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236207578</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Et Tu, Beck? - Part III: Erratic Multimedia Star Pulls Race Card Again</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236197990</link>
<description>I wasn&amp;#039;t arguing against Gingrich&amp;#039;s assertion about Palestinians, I was merely pointing out that there ARE differences between him and Obama. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 03:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236197990</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Et Tu, Beck? - Part III: Erratic Multimedia Star Pulls Race Card Again</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236196530</link>
<description>Even the religious shouldn&amp;#039;t want a president who wants to govern on faith.  The fact is that Christianity has over 30,000 different denominations, and different churches have wildly differing viewpoints on politics, therefore, the chances that a religious candidate will have the same moral compass as the majority of America is next to nothing.  I would no sooner vote for Rev. Wright (Obummer&amp;#039;s commie pastor) than I would for Joel Osteen. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 03:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236196530</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Et Tu, Beck? - Part III: Erratic Multimedia Star Pulls Race Card Again</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236194182</link>
<description>Bachman and Santorum want to turn us into a theocracy.  Paul would weaken our defenses to the point that Iran would launch a nuke at us, I was hoping for Cain myself, but he turned out to be a disappointment. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 03:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236194182</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Et Tu, Beck? - Part III: Erratic Multimedia Star Pulls Race Card Again</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236193435</link>
<description>&amp;quot;As for them being right of Chris Christie and Giuliani look at their records.&amp;quot;   The, &amp;quot;I really don&amp;#039;t know what I&amp;#039;m talking about, so I&amp;#039;ll pretend I do and ask you to make my argument for me&amp;quot; argument is lame.  If you want to defend your position, then defend it, if you want to blindly prop up Romney like a stooge, then just do that.  The fact is that I have presented reasons for my position and you have not presented any for your own other than your opinion that Chris Christie and Rudy Giuliani are left of BOTH Gingrich and Romney.  You defended RomneyCare by saying that the alternative would be worse. Your argument is that Romney compromised his principles to prevent a worse evil, if that were true, then he would not defend RomneyCare as it exists today, he would say that he created a bad program but that it was the best that he could do under the circumstances.  As for the contractor argument on hiring illegals, there is this thing called &amp;quot;vetting&amp;quot; that people in high positions do, it prevents them from doing stupid things like having illegals mow your lawn for 2 years while you are governor of a state with high unemployment!  Honestly, putting the current candidates on a left to right spectrum is hard to do when you consider that they all have non-conservative positions in one area or another, which position do you give more weight to? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 03:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236193435</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Et Tu, Beck? - Part III: Erratic Multimedia Star Pulls Race Card Again</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236099355</link>
<description>Exactly how do you figure that?  Romney created &amp;quot;RomneyCare&amp;quot; , still defends it, and employed illegals.  Gingrich has had so many inconsistent positions over the years that it is hard to say exactly what he&amp;#039;d ever do, he has supported climate change legislation and mandates for healthcare in the past, and has said he is still open to the climate change debate.  But, most recently, he has come out with an amnesty plan for illegals. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 23:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236099355</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>