<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/434341</link>
		<description>Comments by Macleans.ca</description>
<item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Eye of the beholder</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/24/eye-of-the-beholder/#IDComment63867687</link>
<description>I believe Well&amp;#039;s point was not that we don&amp;#039;t take our comment boards seriously, we do. That&amp;#039;s why we&amp;#039;re putting in some effort to keep them clean (with the communities help).   His point was more so that this is in the internet and there will be people on the internet who&amp;#039;s goal it is to offend you. If you plan on spending your time on the internet you need to learn that these people exist and to not take it too personally. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/24/eye-of-the-beholder/#IDComment63867687</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Coyne v. Wells on Obamacare</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/23/coyne-v-wells-on-obamacare/#IDComment63863420</link>
<description>That could be a possibility, anyone else interested in this? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/23/coyne-v-wells-on-obamacare/#IDComment63863420</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Apocalypse now</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#IDComment36891090</link>
<description>Thank you, we will look into that issue. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Oct 2009 20:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/apocalypse-now/#IDComment36891090</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : For your &quot;And here&#039;s a lower place&quot; files: Let&#039;s all fight over which party the </title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/14/for-your-and-heres-a-lower-place-files-lets-all-fight-over-which-party-the-accused-rapists-support/#IDComment27363699</link>
<description>We&amp;#039;re in the process of figuring out the proper settings on the Report Abuse aspect of our comments with IntenseDebate. In general, we try to keep this website Community Moderated, and most editors keep a hands-off approach, except in extreme circumstances.  Your previous comment was automatically deleted because it had been reported a number of times by other readers.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/14/for-your-and-heres-a-lower-place-files-lets-all-fight-over-which-party-the-accused-rapists-support/#IDComment27363699</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : How we spent our weekend</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/29/how-we-spent-our-weekend/#IDComment25856139</link>
<description>No. This Commemorative Issue will not be sent out to subscribers, but is available on newsstands starting today. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/29/how-we-spent-our-weekend/#IDComment25856139</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Coyne v. Wells on Canada: It’s like America, only more conservative</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/22/coyne-v-wells-on-canada-it%e2%80%99s-like-america-only-more-conservative/#IDComment23007729</link>
<description>Apologizes to CR for having to remove the poll. Had to remove it because it was making this page load weirdly. Luckily this is an older post. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Jun 2009 20:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/22/coyne-v-wells-on-canada-it%e2%80%99s-like-america-only-more-conservative/#IDComment23007729</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Today in slurs</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/01/today-in-slurs/#IDComment23003874</link>
<description>Working on it, I did manage to find and approve the above comment. As I&amp;#039;ve posted elsewhere, I recommend signing up for a Intense Debate account.  Seems to prevent weird things from happening.  The bugs will be worked out, be patient. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/01/today-in-slurs/#IDComment23003874</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : &quot;In that regard, let me jog your memory&quot;</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/01/in-that-regard-let-me-jog-your-memory/#IDComment23003325</link>
<description>Also, a tip for anyone, and pass this along. If you sign up for a Intense Debate account, I believe the chances that your comments will be thrown into no-where land (A place where we can not approve or disapprove them) and minimized. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/01/in-that-regard-let-me-jog-your-memory/#IDComment23003325</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : &quot;In that regard, let me jog your memory&quot;</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/01/in-that-regard-let-me-jog-your-memory/#IDComment23002238</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t see any of your recent comments in the moderation cue.  Are you sure they&amp;#039;re being deleted? is the comment below your comment? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Jun 2009 18:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/01/in-that-regard-let-me-jog-your-memory/#IDComment23002238</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Government releases its innovation strategy</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/31/government-releases-its-innovation-strategy/#IDComment22958872</link>
<description>What turns you off of it exactly? Specifics please :) </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Jun 2009 05:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/31/government-releases-its-innovation-strategy/#IDComment22958872</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Tamil questions that can&#039;t be asked</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/28/tamil-questions-that-can&rsquo;t-be-asked/#IDComment22642348</link>
<description>Yah there’s not much we can do about that. Would it make sense to delete the replies?&lt;br /&gt; We are in the works of setting up a new commenting system. That may be an option to delete replies along with the offending comment. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 21:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/28/tamil-questions-that-can&rsquo;t-be-asked/#IDComment22642348</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca - staging : TEST MC TEST TES</title>
<link>http://macleansstaging.wordpress.com/2008/12/04/test-mc-test-tes/#IDComment19677086</link>
<description>ergergerg </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://macleansstaging.wordpress.com/2008/12/04/test-mc-test-tes/#IDComment19677086</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca - staging : TEST MC TEST TES</title>
<link>http://macleansstaging.wordpress.com/2008/12/04/test-mc-test-tes/#IDComment19677080</link>
<description>ergegergerg </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://macleansstaging.wordpress.com/2008/12/04/test-mc-test-tes/#IDComment19677080</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca - staging : TEST MC TEST TES</title>
<link>http://macleansstaging.wordpress.com/2008/12/04/test-mc-test-tes/#IDComment19676944</link>
<description>rththrthrth </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://macleansstaging.wordpress.com/2008/12/04/test-mc-test-tes/#IDComment19676944</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca - staging : TEST MC TEST TES</title>
<link>http://macleansstaging.wordpress.com/2008/12/04/test-mc-test-tes/#IDComment19676939</link>
<description>rthrththth </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://macleansstaging.wordpress.com/2008/12/04/test-mc-test-tes/#IDComment19676939</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca - staging : TEST MC TEST TES</title>
<link>http://macleansstaging.wordpress.com/2008/12/04/test-mc-test-tes/#IDComment19676922</link>
<description>rthththrth </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://macleansstaging.wordpress.com/2008/12/04/test-mc-test-tes/#IDComment19676922</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca - staging : TEST MC TEST TES</title>
<link>http://macleansstaging.wordpress.com/2008/12/04/test-mc-test-tes/#IDComment19676921</link>
<description>rththrthhrt </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://macleansstaging.wordpress.com/2008/12/04/test-mc-test-tes/#IDComment19676921</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca - staging : TEST MC TEST TES</title>
<link>http://macleansstaging.wordpress.com/2008/12/04/test-mc-test-tes/#IDComment19676913</link>
<description>rtgrgrtg </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://macleansstaging.wordpress.com/2008/12/04/test-mc-test-tes/#IDComment19676913</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca - staging : TEST MC TEST TES</title>
<link>http://macleansstaging.wordpress.com/2008/12/04/test-mc-test-tes/#IDComment19676910</link>
<description>rtgrtgrtgrtg </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://macleansstaging.wordpress.com/2008/12/04/test-mc-test-tes/#IDComment19676910</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>