<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/3023640</link>
		<description>Comments by lrlawlor</description>
<item>
<title>Socratic Politics in Digital Dialogue : Digital Dialogue 28: Friends of Passage - Socratic Politics in Digital Dialogue</title>
<link>http://www.personal.psu.edu/cpl2/blogs/digitaldialogue/2010/03/digital-dialogue-28-friends-of-passage.html#IDComment149457491</link>
<description>Thank you for this comment. But I have to say that I do not agree. I think the new sensibility I am seeking is entirely consistent with and based in Bergson&amp;#039;s idea of open morality and dynamic religion. It requires an intuition, but the problem is: how to get the intuition? For Bergson, it is through creative emotions. What needs to be motivated is an emotion that opens one to all of life. Moreover, this type of openness is precisely what Lyotard was interested in under the word &amp;quot;postmodernism.&amp;quot; Postmodernism is about creativity, as in creative emotions. It is about the openness of the future. Also, Derrida wrote about Bergson in an article called &amp;quot;Faith and Knowledge,&amp;quot; in which he implies that deconstruction is inspired by the idea of open morality. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 May 2011 12:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.personal.psu.edu/cpl2/blogs/digitaldialogue/2010/03/digital-dialogue-28-friends-of-passage.html#IDComment149457491</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>