<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/769318</link>
		<description>Comments by larrysydney</description>
<item>
<title>Big Government : Joint Committee on Taxation Confirms that ObamaCare Does Not Enforce Individual Mandate</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/mrichmond/2010/03/26/joint-committee-on-taxation-confirms-that-obamacare-does-not-enforce-individual-mandate/#IDComment64227781</link>
<description>That is  Obama&amp;#039;s plan. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/mrichmond/2010/03/26/joint-committee-on-taxation-confirms-that-obamacare-does-not-enforce-individual-mandate/#IDComment64227781</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Joint Committee on Taxation Confirms that ObamaCare Does Not Enforce Individual Mandate</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/mrichmond/2010/03/26/joint-committee-on-taxation-confirms-that-obamacare-does-not-enforce-individual-mandate/#IDComment64224728</link>
<description>I saw Oreilly&amp;#039;s coverage of this issue the last few nights.I hope he admits his mistake tonight,followed by Joe Liebermans explanation for destroying the insurance industry. As planned,we are on the road to a single payer system! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/mrichmond/2010/03/26/joint-committee-on-taxation-confirms-that-obamacare-does-not-enforce-individual-mandate/#IDComment64224728</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Chicago Paper Runs Racist-Sexist Headline In Election Coverage: &quot;...Make The Chamber A Little More B</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/amarcus/2010/01/22/chicago-paper-runs-racist-sexist-headline-in-election-coverage-make-the-chamber-a-little-more-black-female-gay-or-righteous/#IDComment53438177</link>
<description>This is what i now call a Oberliberal comment. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/amarcus/2010/01/22/chicago-paper-runs-racist-sexist-headline-in-election-coverage-make-the-chamber-a-little-more-black-female-gay-or-righteous/#IDComment53438177</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama: &#039;Break Out Your Pitchforks And Head For The Banks!&#039;</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/01/22/obama-break-out-your-pitchforks-and-head-for-the-banks/#IDComment53437721</link>
<description>A word from Mass.: User Image   larrysydney wrote: I guess the Obama administration didn&amp;#039;t hear us Tuesday.Three days later,with Barney on the point,it&amp;#039;s back to all politics all the time.What will it take get through to these people!JOBS JOBS JOBS Mr. Frank! Your populist, hate the bankers tryst is about getting re-elected,not creating jobs.Do you really think this tactic is fooling anyone? Is it O.K. to push the economy closer to a W recovery just to try help your parties image?I&amp;#039;ll have to assume you and the POTUS just don&amp;#039;t get it.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/01/22/obama-break-out-your-pitchforks-and-head-for-the-banks/#IDComment53437721</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>