<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/939690</link>
		<description>Comments by larrypuma77</description>
<item>
<title>Big Government : Gay Tea Partiers Discuss Marriage And Bigotry</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/08/06/gay-tea-partiers-discuss-marriage-and-bigotry/#IDComment91250066</link>
<description>Yeah but you&amp;#039;ll still be an idiot for a lifetime.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2010 19:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/08/06/gay-tea-partiers-discuss-marriage-and-bigotry/#IDComment91250066</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Gay Tea Partiers Discuss Marriage And Bigotry</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/08/06/gay-tea-partiers-discuss-marriage-and-bigotry/#IDComment91248351</link>
<description>Yeah, Sherrod is still the racist. You must still be watching the Breitbart tape.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2010 19:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/08/06/gay-tea-partiers-discuss-marriage-and-bigotry/#IDComment91248351</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Gay Tea Partiers Discuss Marriage And Bigotry</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/08/06/gay-tea-partiers-discuss-marriage-and-bigotry/#IDComment91247883</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s an orientation. And you&amp;#039;ve obviously never known a g.a.y. person if you think it&amp;#039;s a choice. Bi-sexuality perhaps is a choice but not homosexuality. Did you choose to be straight? Or were you just born straight? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2010 18:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/08/06/gay-tea-partiers-discuss-marriage-and-bigotry/#IDComment91247883</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Gay Tea Partiers Discuss Marriage And Bigotry</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/08/06/gay-tea-partiers-discuss-marriage-and-bigotry/#IDComment91247374</link>
<description>How could they be fighting for the equality of other g.ay men if they are for denying gay&amp;#039;s the right to marry? Oh, I know, it&amp;#039;s completely an issue of money. You don&amp;#039;t think that if two g.ay males are partnered for a lifetime they don&amp;#039;t deserve to have all the same legal priviledges of a married couple?  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2010 18:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/08/06/gay-tea-partiers-discuss-marriage-and-bigotry/#IDComment91247374</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Gay Tea Partiers Discuss Marriage And Bigotry</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/08/06/gay-tea-partiers-discuss-marriage-and-bigotry/#IDComment91242814</link>
<description>Since homosexuality isnt a race that makes you an idiot. And I&amp;#039;m sure still a homophobe.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2010 18:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/08/06/gay-tea-partiers-discuss-marriage-and-bigotry/#IDComment91242814</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Gay Tea Partiers Discuss Marriage And Bigotry</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/08/06/gay-tea-partiers-discuss-marriage-and-bigotry/#IDComment91242040</link>
<description>Sherodism?  Yeah, she&amp;#039;s still the racist and Breitbart is the innocent party in all this. hahahahaha. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2010 18:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/08/06/gay-tea-partiers-discuss-marriage-and-bigotry/#IDComment91242040</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Gay Tea Partiers Discuss Marriage And Bigotry</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/08/06/gay-tea-partiers-discuss-marriage-and-bigotry/#IDComment91241718</link>
<description>Yeah as g.ay men to fight against the equality of other g.ays would make them open for ridicule by the g.ay community. Would you rather I replace &amp;quot;their own kind&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;Other g.ays&amp;quot; or do you want to have a semantic argument about it? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2010 18:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/08/06/gay-tea-partiers-discuss-marriage-and-bigotry/#IDComment91241718</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Gay Tea Partiers Discuss Marriage And Bigotry</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/08/06/gay-tea-partiers-discuss-marriage-and-bigotry/#IDComment91237814</link>
<description>If they are fighting their own kind I suppose they would be open to ridicule from them, yes? They&amp;#039;re effectively traitors. Of course Breitbart.com being so low down in the racism/bigotry debate has to say this is &amp;quot;hateful bigotry&amp;quot; in order to spin those charges leftwards. What a joke. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2010 18:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/08/06/gay-tea-partiers-discuss-marriage-and-bigotry/#IDComment91237814</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Appeal filed over gay marriage ruling in Calif.</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9HDJ2AG0&show_article=1#IDComment91233725</link>
<description>How is it the destruction of family values? Maybe just worry about your own family and not anyone else&amp;#039;s?  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2010 17:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9HDJ2AG0&show_article=1#IDComment91233725</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Sean Penn Trashes Wyclef Jean: Stooge For American Corporate Interests</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2010/08/06/sean-penn-trashes-wycleaf-jean-stooge-for-american-corporate-interests/#IDComment91219598</link>
<description>Well maybe because Penn has been on the ground in Haiti for months helping out and Wyclef has barely shown up and when he has he&amp;#039;s got an entourage in tow and done little to actually help. I think what Penn is saying is that Haiti doesnt need Wyclef. They need a real leader.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2010 16:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2010/08/06/sean-penn-trashes-wycleaf-jean-stooge-for-american-corporate-interests/#IDComment91219598</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Friday Free-For-All: Hiroshima Edition</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/06/friday-free-for-all-hiroshima-edition/#IDComment91214197</link>
<description>Your wife&amp;#039;s nipples gave me nipple breath.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2010 15:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/06/friday-free-for-all-hiroshima-edition/#IDComment91214197</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Today&#039;s Open Thread</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2010/08/06/todays-open-thread-65/#IDComment91204412</link>
<description>Take it up with the author&amp;#039;s and filmmakers, the latter targeting the Bush regime.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2010/08/06/todays-open-thread-65/#IDComment91204412</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Today&#039;s Open Thread</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2010/08/06/todays-open-thread-65/#IDComment91204083</link>
<description>Yeah, that&amp;#039;s it even though the movie came out in 2007, during Bush, and hence why it resonated so much. And uh, yeah, homosexuals as government targets is something liberals would do. How do you engage in such awful self deception?  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2010/08/06/todays-open-thread-65/#IDComment91204083</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Today&#039;s Open Thread</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2010/08/06/todays-open-thread-65/#IDComment91203700</link>
<description>And you&amp;#039;re even dumber. What business is it of yours what me and my boyfriend do? Oh yeah, you&amp;#039;re a conservative and have to peek under other peoples bedroom doors to find out what you&amp;#039;re missing.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2010/08/06/todays-open-thread-65/#IDComment91203700</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Today&#039;s Open Thread</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2010/08/06/todays-open-thread-65/#IDComment91203243</link>
<description>Correct.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2010/08/06/todays-open-thread-65/#IDComment91203243</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Today&#039;s Open Thread</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2010/08/06/todays-open-thread-65/#IDComment91202040</link>
<description>Who cares what the authors intent was? he wrote it. Ok, the authors wrong about what he wrote and was secretly writing about leftists. Sorry, you&amp;#039;re wrong and too small to admit it. Ever seen Alan Moore interviewed? Ever watch a Wachowski film? DEFINITELY NOT CONSERVATIVES! LOL! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2010/08/06/todays-open-thread-65/#IDComment91202040</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Today&#039;s Open Thread</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2010/08/06/todays-open-thread-65/#IDComment91200116</link>
<description>yeah that&amp;#039;s it. LOL! He just goes on to say that liberals watched on in horror as the Reagan/Thatcher f**k buddy coalition takes over and then goes on to talk about the rise of the National Front(a far right group) taking over the streets of Britian, etc. and that was the influence for the piece. No mention of the horrors of the NHS or immigrants. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2010/08/06/todays-open-thread-65/#IDComment91200116</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Today&#039;s Open Thread</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2010/08/06/todays-open-thread-65/#IDComment91199316</link>
<description>The Nazi&amp;#039;s were leftists? Hmmmm....Oh that&amp;#039;s right according to right wing revisionism they are even though they despised communists, liberals, homosexuals, and immigrants and they were a nationalist movement. Oh right, it&amp;#039;s that word socialism which Hitler regretted and said had zero to do with Karl Marx, and because it instigsated class warfare and had a hatred for the middle class and private property which he was actually for.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2010/08/06/todays-open-thread-65/#IDComment91199316</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Today&#039;s Open Thread</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2010/08/06/todays-open-thread-65/#IDComment91198458</link>
<description>So the author was deluding himself? Why would a left wing/anarchist author write a pro right wing piece? LOL! You&amp;#039;re a moron. Funny how the movie was released during the Bush years and I think any thinking person could deduce that it&amp;#039;s a reaction to the Patriot Act and Fox news.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2010/08/06/todays-open-thread-65/#IDComment91198458</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Today&#039;s Open Thread</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2010/08/06/todays-open-thread-65/#IDComment91197078</link>
<description>Wrong. He&amp;#039;s spoken about this repeatedly and said the influence for the piece was the Reagan/Thatcher coalition. There&amp;#039;s no mention of how horrible socialized medicine or immigrants are. In fact g.a.y. s are government targets which they certainly wouldnt be under progressive regimes. Moore is definitely not a conservative and most certainly a left wing anarchist since he&amp;#039;s also written works critical of the CIA. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2010 13:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2010/08/06/todays-open-thread-65/#IDComment91197078</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>