<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1375799</link>
		<description>Comments by lagmart</description>
<item>
<title>Big Journalism : Sound Bite For The Day: Chris Matthews: &#039;Juan Williams Name Is Racist&#039;</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/01/17/sound-bite-for-the-day-chris-matthews-juan-williams-name-is-racist/#IDComment267904683</link>
<description>Can&amp;#039;t watch it.  I tried, but as I watched, I could feel brain cells dying the longer the MSNBC yuks talked... </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/01/17/sound-bite-for-the-day-chris-matthews-juan-williams-name-is-racist/#IDComment267904683</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Conservative Filmmakers Need Your Vote Today</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/dmiller/2012/01/06/conservative-filmmakers-need-your-vote-today/#IDComment256986492</link>
<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.indiewire.com/article/vote-for-project-of-the-week-whittaker-chambers-mulligan-alice-walker-el-pastor&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.indiewire.com/article/vote-for-project...&lt;/a&gt;  A working link in case you missed the other one up further... </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Jan 2012 18:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/dmiller/2012/01/06/conservative-filmmakers-need-your-vote-today/#IDComment256986492</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama: ‘I Didn&#039;t Over Promise’…‘I Don&#039;t Control the Weather’</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jbradley/2011/12/11/obama-i-didnt-over-promisei-dont-control-the-weather/#IDComment236049620</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Would you like to see the bullet proof formula that catapulted him to victory in 2008?  1). Election  2). ???  3). Utopia&amp;quot;     So he&amp;#039;s sort of the presidential version of the Underpants Gnomes?   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBiSI6OdqvA&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBiSI6OdqvA&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 20:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jbradley/2011/12/11/obama-i-didnt-over-promisei-dont-control-the-weather/#IDComment236049620</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : #OccupyVancouver: Mayor Vows to Shut Down Protest after Second Overdose in Three Days</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/11/06/occupyvancouver-mayor-vows-to-shut-down-protest-after-second-overdose-in-three-days/#IDComment217974424</link>
<description>Anyone else click on the link to the story and get a &amp;quot;File has been moved or deleted&amp;quot; page? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Nov 2011 04:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/11/06/occupyvancouver-mayor-vows-to-shut-down-protest-after-second-overdose-in-three-days/#IDComment217974424</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : Did Chemical Blasts Bring Down The Twin Towers?</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/nmachiavelli/2011/09/21/did-chemical-blasts-bring-down-the-twin-towers/#IDComment196623730</link>
<description>I beg to differ - the pressure of the NY water system just isn&amp;#039;t powerful enough to get water up above a certain level, so in order for floors above that level to actually have water, they must pump the water up into holding tanks on the roof of the skyscraper.  It&amp;#039;s why there are so many water towers on the roofs of the buildings in the city.  Now, I may not be an expert on how the towers overcame that obstacle, but considering that the most economical method of getting water pressure on those tall floors is to pump it into a holding tank and let gravity provide the pressure rather than leaving an incredibly expensive pump going all the time, I&amp;#039;m assuming that they pumped water into holding tanks.  So in short, I&amp;#039;m willing to bet that there WERE sprinklers even if the supply lines were cut since there would have been water in the holding tanks.  Not that I&amp;#039;m agreeing with the explanation or a conspiracy nut - I&amp;#039;m just saying that the explosion explanation presented is still valid. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 06:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/nmachiavelli/2011/09/21/did-chemical-blasts-bring-down-the-twin-towers/#IDComment196623730</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : Brad Thor&#039;s Best Yet: Full Black</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/stzu/2011/07/31/brad-thors-best-yet-full-black/#IDComment178971148</link>
<description>One of Brad&amp;#039;s best books!  It&amp;#039;s hard not to read it in one sitting if you are easily sucked into a good book!   And this is indeed a good book! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Aug 2011 04:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/stzu/2011/07/31/brad-thors-best-yet-full-black/#IDComment178971148</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Ex-Union Member Fights $200,000 Union Fine For Working Non-Union</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/laborunionreport/2011/07/31/ex-union-member-fights-200000-union-fine-for-working-non-union/#IDComment178844728</link>
<description>All too often, unions seem to be just glorified and extortion rackets, protected by law and the politicians they routinely buy off.  The image they prop up of benevolent crusaders for the little guy can&amp;#039;t hold up forever when they pull this kind of idiotic BS.  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 15:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/laborunionreport/2011/07/31/ex-union-member-fights-200000-union-fine-for-working-non-union/#IDComment178844728</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Reason.tv: Fox News&#039; Juan Williams on School Choice</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/07/30/reason-tv-fox-news-juan-williams-on-school-choice/#IDComment178744223</link>
<description>I give up - you win.  Whatever you want to think, I don&amp;#039;t care.  Just let the issue drop.  I was not trying to be confrontational, whatever you may think.  I&amp;#039;ll assume you weren&amp;#039;t either and that I misconstrued your further statements.  Anything to end this farcical nonsense... </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 04:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/07/30/reason-tv-fox-news-juan-williams-on-school-choice/#IDComment178744223</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Reason.tv: Fox News&#039; Juan Williams on School Choice</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/07/30/reason-tv-fox-news-juan-williams-on-school-choice/#IDComment178673364</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m not playing any games, and I think you might want to back down a few notches.  All I did was point out that your comment could be misconstrued.  If you want to pick a fight, go pick one with a progressive. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 21:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/07/30/reason-tv-fox-news-juan-williams-on-school-choice/#IDComment178673364</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Reason.tv: Fox News&#039; Juan Williams on School Choice</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/07/30/reason-tv-fox-news-juan-williams-on-school-choice/#IDComment178628842</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;ll give you the benefit of the doubt that you just misspoke, but you might want to rethink that &amp;quot;genetically incapable&amp;quot; remark.  It can be taken in a very, very bad light... </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 16:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/07/30/reason-tv-fox-news-juan-williams-on-school-choice/#IDComment178628842</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Reason.tv: Fox News&#039; Juan Williams on School Choice</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/07/30/reason-tv-fox-news-juan-williams-on-school-choice/#IDComment178619247</link>
<description>Emphasis on slowly, though.  He&amp;#039;s still fairly well hooked on a lot of progressive BS.  If you see him on Hannity&amp;#039;s Great American Panel or The O&amp;#039;Reilly Factor he can still unleash a torrent of the usual leftist fantasy.  Ah well, I guess I can be patient, though... </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/07/30/reason-tv-fox-news-juan-williams-on-school-choice/#IDComment178619247</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Reason.tv: Fox News&#039; Juan Williams on School Choice</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/07/30/reason-tv-fox-news-juan-williams-on-school-choice/#IDComment178616433</link>
<description>Juan Williams honestly gets me angry when I hear him express his opinions at times, but the miraculous thing is that when the debate ends, I&amp;#039;m no longer angry and I can genuinely like the guy.  It&amp;#039;s a real shame the left figuratively chased him off with a stick.  The left needs more Juan Williams types - the ones who are honest, reasonable and civil in their beliefs and debate tactics rather than Machiavellian and blurring the line of demarcation between sanity and lunacy.  Matter of fact, I sometimes think that there are some conservatives who could learn the same lesson...  Which brings me to the content of this article - This is one of the few times I am full-on headlong in agreement with Juan!  School choice, especially in areas like Washington DC where the public school system is a wasteland, is desperately needed, especially for lower income neighborhoods! </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/07/30/reason-tv-fox-news-juan-williams-on-school-choice/#IDComment178616433</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Rep. Paul Ryan Destroys Reid Bill in Blistering Speech; &#039;Let&#039;s Cover the Moon with Yogurt!&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/rep-paul-ryan-destroys-reid-bill-in-blistering-speech-lets-cover-the-moon-with-yogurt/#IDComment178614446</link>
<description>And the Republicans are the ones who are being &amp;quot;intractable&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;refuse to compromise?&amp;quot;  Someone please tell me why Boehner is even trying...  The only thing he&amp;#039;s doing is letting the Dems take potshots at him... </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/rep-paul-ryan-destroys-reid-bill-in-blistering-speech-lets-cover-the-moon-with-yogurt/#IDComment178614446</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Sound Bite for the Day: Comfortable Bar Stools</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/07/27/sound-bite-for-the-day-comfortable-bar-stools/#IDComment177825771</link>
<description>First off, libel is the act of defamation in a written form and slander is the spoken form, so slander would be what you&amp;#039;re after here.  Second off, you have to prove that the act of defamation caused substantive and measurable harm to win the case, and at this point partisan rancor is so rampant I don&amp;#039;t think the case would stick since nobody watches MSNBC who doesn&amp;#039;t already believe that tripe... </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/07/27/sound-bite-for-the-day-comfortable-bar-stools/#IDComment177825771</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Sound Bite for the Day: Comfortable Bar Stools</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/07/27/sound-bite-for-the-day-comfortable-bar-stools/#IDComment177824592</link>
<description>MSNBC with their typical class and intellectual depth.  Why are we watching this blowhard? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/07/27/sound-bite-for-the-day-comfortable-bar-stools/#IDComment177824592</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Desperation: House Dems Urge Obama to Unilaterally Lift the Debt Ceiling</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/07/27/desperation-house-dems-urge-obama-to-unilaterally-lift-the-debt-ceiling/#IDComment177821836</link>
<description>If we actually looked at intent when judging the framework of the constitution as was originally intended instead of this &amp;quot;living document&amp;quot; nonsense, then this would not be an issue.  The clause they&amp;#039;re talking about in the 14th amendment was written to essentially say &amp;quot;the union ain&amp;#039;t paying for the confederacy&amp;#039;s debt, nor will it ever pay for the debt incurred by anyone who tries to secede.&amp;quot;  I hate the lawyer mentality - the twisting and torturing of words just to get your own way... </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/07/27/desperation-house-dems-urge-obama-to-unilaterally-lift-the-debt-ceiling/#IDComment177821836</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Trailer Talk: &#039;The Muppets&#039; Has Potential</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhanlon/2011/07/27/trailer-talk-the-muppets-has-potential/#IDComment177804182</link>
<description>If there are political cheap shots, I just pray that I can overlook them...  I love the Muppets too much to miss this! </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhanlon/2011/07/27/trailer-talk-the-muppets-has-potential/#IDComment177804182</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Olbermann: Allen West Is a &quot;Bash*t Crazy Bully&quot; Who Would &quot;Shoot People&quot; on TV</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/07/20/olbermann-allen-west-is-a-basht-crazy-bully-who-would-shoot-people-on-tv/#IDComment175592451</link>
<description>Wait, wait, wait, WAIT!!!!!!!!    ...Is Olberman on TV again?    ...Can you even call Current &amp;quot;on TV?&amp;quot; I mean, that &amp;quot;network&amp;quot; barely draws more viewers than your average hamster cage... </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/07/20/olbermann-allen-west-is-a-basht-crazy-bully-who-would-shoot-people-on-tv/#IDComment175592451</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama’s Labor Board: We Prosecute Dead People Too…</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/laborunionreport/2011/07/14/obamas-labor-board-we-prosecute-dead-people-too/#IDComment173478190</link>
<description>Did I miss the opening credits?  Are we in a Mel Brooks movie or something?!   No, it can&amp;#039;t be...  Mel Brooks would wrap something like this in a screwball plot - and since I don&amp;#039;t see President Skroob and the Spaceballs here, I have to assume that I&amp;#039;m in a waking nightmare worse than I originally thought it was... </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/laborunionreport/2011/07/14/obamas-labor-board-we-prosecute-dead-people-too/#IDComment173478190</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Whoopi Gets Facts Wrong in Bizarre Racial Rant Against Michele Bachmann</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/dloesch/2011/07/12/whoopi-gets-facts-wrong-in-bizarre-racial-rant-against-michele-bachmann/#IDComment172714267</link>
<description>Sometimes Dana&amp;#039;s syntax isn&amp;#039;t the best - what she said was &amp;quot;We&amp;rsquo;ve become the first industrialized nation to outlaw slavery, to elect a black president...&amp;quot;, and what I believe she meant was We&amp;#039;ve become the first industrialized nation that has ended slavery to elect a black president.    Even there, though, she is unfortunately incorrect as Nelson Mandela preceded Obama as a Chief Executive.  And I could also be wrong.  I like Dana, but I think she&amp;#039;s definitely got something wrong in her statement here, unfortunately. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/dloesch/2011/07/12/whoopi-gets-facts-wrong-in-bizarre-racial-rant-against-michele-bachmann/#IDComment172714267</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>