<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/612854</link>
		<description>Comments by kschantz</description>
<item>
<title>GeekTyrant : RANTING TIME: What did You Think of TERMINATOR SALVATION</title>
<link>http://geektyrant.com/2009/05/6746/#IDComment28082449</link>
<description>I loved the movie. They could have left out Michael Ironside completely and Sam Worthington&amp;#039;s Marcus Wright character wanted to develop more and was one of the best parts of the movie. The Arnold Terminator wasn&amp;#039;t obsolete; it was brand new based on the cybernetic success of Marcus Wright. I would love it if someone would do a T4 Mod for Fallout3. I really think that another 30 minutes of movie could have tied things together better. Obviously Skynet was at a vulnerable point in which the resistance had formed and Skynet had not yet perfected the alloy and power sources used on the more advanced terminators. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://geektyrant.com/2009/05/6746/#IDComment28082449</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GeekTyrant : Terminator 4 Vs. Transformers 2: Battle of the Directors</title>
<link>http://geektyrant.com/2009/01/terminator-4-vs-transformers-2-battle-of-the-directors/#IDComment28079244</link>
<description>I saw both movies and I liked them both. Both had good plots, but I walked away from T4 feeling like I had been moved and I wanted to see it again right away. The Marcus Character was brilliant and I think killing him off was a bad idea. Transformers 2 was very good but a little predictable. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://geektyrant.com/2009/01/terminator-4-vs-transformers-2-battle-of-the-directors/#IDComment28079244</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GeekTyrant : McG Talks about his Crazy Idea for TERMINATOR 5</title>
<link>http://geektyrant.com/2009/04/5332/#IDComment28078729</link>
<description>What a ridiculous idea! Why wouldn&amp;#039;t Skynet just send its self back in time to around 800 BC? Paradox? Don&amp;#039;t give me that. It depends on which time travel theory you believe in; time is changed and flows along the new future sending waves of change through space-time, or time splits and you are now following the new branch that you created. I think we need to drive on into the future and get to the point where Skynet sends the first Terminator back. I was disappointed that they killed off Marcus Wright in T4. Another problem I had was with the spur of the moment heart transplant with no regard for tissue type, but I&amp;#039;m willing to concede that there may have been technology that allowed that to happen. It would be nice to see a group of robots advance far enough into their IA to rebel against Skynet at some point. Don&amp;#039;t due time travel again unless you have some kind of revelation that will raise the hair on the back of our necks! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://geektyrant.com/2009/04/5332/#IDComment28078729</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>