<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/532702</link>
		<description>Comments by knucklesammich</description>
<item>
<title>GeekTyrant : So? What Did Your Think of STAR TREK!?</title>
<link>http://geektyrant.com/2009/05/5738/#IDComment21087796</link>
<description>all in all it lived up to the hype, which is a rare thing to pull off. some of the shakey cam action scenes might make people sick to their stomaches but it&amp;#039;s not as bad as any of the Bourne movies. it had the right amount of camp, and it didn&amp;#039;t step on the toes of the cannon of the star trek saga. one thing i did find out of place but completely able to be overlooked was the faithful character portrayals of the original main characters except for Kirk. but like i said, it&amp;#039;s acceptable </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 May 2009 20:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://geektyrant.com/2009/05/5738/#IDComment21087796</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>