Concerning associations and activities or organizations, this is a well-researched article. However it also serves to exculpate Islam. Listen to the following sentence

It makes sense for Ellison to be at an event such as this, as he has regularly participated at various radical Muslim functions, including speaking engagements at conferences sponsored by the Minnesota chapter of the Muslim American Society (MAS-Minnesota), at the same time the group was propagating material on its website praising Hamas and calling for the murder of Jews.
Did you get that? By attributing terrorism to "radical Muslim functions" Kaufman exculpate Islam. There is no "radical" Islam. There is only Islam. And yes, Islam is terroristic.

Lovely article: a blend of a narrative of redemptive relationships intended towards Muslims and a lament that those Muslims have used Islam to unskin themselves of their humanity so as to stymie themselves of making sociological progress.

FPM should thank its stars Mr. Greenfield writes for them.

Interestingly, this group claims to not be against Islam, but Islamism. Fight Islamism and Islam will lie vindicated. There is no Islamism. There is just Islam and that terror chieftain, Mohammad.

This is a wrong-headed group. Patriarchy is in our DNA. It is unavoidable. See The Inevitability of Patriarchy by Bernard Goldberg. Even feminists agree that there has never been a matriarchal society. Yet to this group of girls, Patriarchy ranks up there with Nazism and Islam. Patriarchy is good for all members of society.

But titling this article, "Nigeria Wins Cup of Nations, but Islamists Continue Killing" the editors, like the Hillary-led State Department, serve as enablers to Islamic murder.

Instead the title should be, "Nigeria Wins Cup of Nations, but Muslims Continue Killing" or better, "Nigeria Wins Cup of Nations, but Mohammadians Continue Killing."

What are "Islamists"? People who are devoted to "Islamism"? Koranism? Malarkey. These multicultural euphemisms are all a part of the hear-no, see-no, speak-no evil of Islam gestapo.

"It lasted for more than a year with no challenge [from] university officials or public authorities or the mainstream media."

The way to push Obama off the fiscal cliff is for the GOP to finally enter Obama's heretofore uncontested moral arena. The GOP needed Romney to say, "Both Democrats and Republicans believe that slavery and racism is wrong. But the way we find something to be wrong is to evaluate the moral principles that the practice violates. When we do this we see that if slavery is wrong then taxing one's income must also be wrong. If we say that one man's rights end where another man's nose begins, how can we say that one man's wallet is the place were another man's political fortunes begin?

I'm not saying that all taxation is immoral, I'm only addressing the immorality of income taxation here. Taxing consumption falls into an entirely different moral hemisphere than taxing income. When you tax income, you tax our possibilities, the dreams of our children, the creation of wealth, the creation of jobs and you subvert our unalienable right to the pursuit of liberty and happiness. In many important ways, taxing income is qualitatively different than taxing demand, than taxing consumption. Our founders understood this difference. By the way, the Sixteenth Amendment was fraudulently passed and is incompatible with the "self evident" natural law foundation of The Declaration."

See the article at teapartynationDOTcom

A powerful message highlighting the cultural entertainment trump over dry scholarship.

But do we have an English-challenged sentence here, "The sole purpose of this trust would be to finance the engagement of Second Amendment attorneys to prosecute litigation designed to result in judicial decisions affirming the constitutional right of individuals to keep and bear arms"???

If one prosecutes such litigation than one works against "the constitutional right of individuals to keep and bear arms."

I was in agreement with Solway up until he wrote, "This does not militate against any race, religion or ethnicity, and we know that there are peaceful, law-abiding, responsible and productive members of any and every immigrant group, without exception."

Below are some references that the "holy" koran makes toward non-Muslim women sex slaves:
Quran, 4:3: If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, marry women of your choice, two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice.

Quran, 4:24: Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess: Thus hath Allah ordained (Prohibitions) against you.

4:25 (Picktall) And whoso is not able to afford to marry free, believing women, let them marry from the believing maids whom your right hands possess. Allah knoweth best (concerning) your faith. Ye (proceed) one from another; so wed them by permission of their folk, and give unto them their portions in kindness, they being honest, not debauched nor of loose conduct. And if when they are honorably married they commit lewdness they shall incur the half of the punishment (prescribed) for free women (in that case). This is for him among you who feareth to commit sin. But to have patience would be better for you. Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

4:36 (Picktall) And serve Allah. Ascribe no thing as partner unto Him. (Show) kindness unto parents, and unto near kindred, and orphans, and the needy, and into the neighbor who is of kin (unto you) and the neighbor who is not of kin and the fellow traveller and the wayfarer and (the slaves) whom your right hands possess. Lo! Allah loveth not such as are proud and boastful,

16:71 (Picktall) And Allah hath favored some of you above others in provision. Now those who are more favored will by no means hand over their provision to those (slaves) whom their right hands possess, so that they may be equal with them in respect thereof. Is it then the grace of Allah that they deny?

23:6 (Picktall) Save from their wives or the (slaves) that their right hands possess, for then they are not blameworthy,

30:28 (Picktall) He coineth for you a similitude of yourselves. Have ye, from among those whom your right hands possess, partners in the wealth We have bestowed upon you, equal with you in respect thereof, so that ye fear them as ye fear each other (that ye ascribe unto Us partners out of that which We created)? Thus We display the revelations for people who have sense.

Quran, 33:50: O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to thee.

33:52 (Picktall) It is not allowed thee to take (other) women henceforth nor that thou shouldst change them for other wives even though their beauty pleased thee, save those whom thy right hand possesseth. And Allah is Watcher over all things.

70:30 (Picktall) Save with their wives and those whom their right hands possess, for thus they are not blameworthy;

If the US has a zero-tolerance policy toward trafficking in human persons, then it should deny 501(c)3 status to Islamic organizations. The Koran fights against natural law and so employs this euphemism, "right hand possessions." Were the Koran to call said sex slaves "sex slaves," there would not be many Muslims and the multiculturalists could not stomach the celebration of Islam.