<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/523756</link>
		<description>Comments by jtsgrandmom</description>
<item>
<title>American Vision News : Santorum endorses &quot;worst Republican in the country&quot; who &quot;frightens me&quot; </title>
<link>http://americanvisionnews.com/3324/santorum-endorses-worst-republican-in-the-country-who-frightens-me#IDComment357533234</link>
<description>Romney, Obama, either way, you get Obamney. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 01:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://americanvisionnews.com/3324/santorum-endorses-worst-republican-in-the-country-who-frightens-me#IDComment357533234</guid>
</item><item>
<title>American Vision News : Santorum endorses &quot;worst Republican in the country&quot; who &quot;frightens me&quot; </title>
<link>http://americanvisionnews.com/3324/santorum-endorses-worst-republican-in-the-country-who-frightens-me#IDComment357532988</link>
<description>He just proves again what the politically informed already know, to the ruling cartel, all are interchangeable.   They are part of one Republicrat Party.  And truth be told, the GOP would rather Obama, a man they &amp;quot;can do(fishy)  business with&amp;quot; than Ron Paul, the one they can&amp;#039;t.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 01:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://americanvisionnews.com/3324/santorum-endorses-worst-republican-in-the-country-who-frightens-me#IDComment357532988</guid>
</item><item>
<title>American Vision News : U.S. Troops fully armed patrolling neighborhood streets</title>
<link>http://americanvisionnews.com/3201/u-s-troops-fully-armed-patrolling-neighborhood-streets#IDComment352716200</link>
<description>NDAA was written by the GOP and passed by the majority of GOP, 1/2  the Democrats voted against it.  So put the blame where it belongs.  BHO is just the latest henchman of the RepubliCrats, who double team us, even as they divide it.  Tossing BHO will not change the policy, a policy now dictated by the UN and not the American people.  Chop off the BHO head of the Hydra, many more grow back.  Those of you who think voting for ObamNEY is the answer, please, think again.  Romney advocates and defends the cancellation of the Bill of Rights in the &amp;quot;Patriot&amp;quot; (the more apt name, Traitor) Act and its final death knell, NDAA.  The candidate who stands firmly against all this is Ron Paul, he has written legislation gutting both Pat Act and NDAA.  No, he can&amp;#039;t cure all ills, only the American people rising to defend and restore our land, can.  But he will be as he has been for decades,  the voice of opposition in DC, a voice that is sorely needed.  Media will HAVE to give exposure to the Constitutional POV that RP has espoused thru decades in DC. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 May 2012 14:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://americanvisionnews.com/3201/u-s-troops-fully-armed-patrolling-neighborhood-streets#IDComment352716200</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Expose Obama : New Evidence That Catholics Could Seal Obama’s Doom This November</title>
<link>http://www.exposeobama.com/2012/04/20/new-evidence-that-catholics-could-seal-obamas-doom-this-november/#IDComment343723675</link>
<description>Can&amp;#039;t say about Catholics but the evangelicals are going to Ron Paul in great numbers, not Romney:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://americanvisionnews.com/2869/doug-wead-evangelicals-turn-to-ron-paul&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://americanvisionnews.com/2869/doug-wead-evan...&lt;/a&gt;  And since Romney and Romneycare, provide abortion services, since Romney has flip flopped publically on this issue, I do believe it&amp;#039;s doubtful that the assumptions and presumptions stated here, that Romney is somehow &amp;quot;heir apparent&amp;quot; rings true.  If you want ot protect life, born and unborn, liberty, pursuit of happiness and the right to own (nd defend) property, Romney is not it.   Ron Paul, is.    Romney is the same side of the same evil coin as is Obama and why many refer to him as &amp;quot;Obamalite.&amp;quot;   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 22:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.exposeobama.com/2012/04/20/new-evidence-that-catholics-could-seal-obamas-doom-this-november/#IDComment343723675</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Tea Party Tribune - Tea Party &amp; Political News : Troops are beginning to refuse to follow unlawful orders</title>
<link>http://www.teapartytribune.com/2012/03/06/troops-are-beginning-to-refuse-to-follow-unlawful-orders/#IDComment316050474</link>
<description>Just remember, the &amp;quot;Nuremberg Defense,&amp;quot; (&amp;quot;I was just following orders&amp;#039;) won&amp;#039;t work when the day of reckoning comes.  And it WILL come.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.teapartytribune.com/2012/03/06/troops-are-beginning-to-refuse-to-follow-unlawful-orders/#IDComment316050474</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : AP source: ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268318629</link>
<description>There are three comments below that are really all one but wouldn&amp;#039;t &amp;quot;fit.&amp;quot;  Sorry they are disjointed. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 04:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268318629</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : AP source: ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268318278</link>
<description>You see, the next &amp;quot;necessaries&amp;quot; on the assault upon our liberties were/are so aggregious, the GOP could not get away with putting them in.  So they have their complicit alter ego, whose constituency is &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; take the exec. office to complete Bush&amp;#039;s work called the Patriot Act, more aptly named the Traitor Act. Bush started the assault on the Bill of Rights and dismantled the ones that could be &amp;quot;sold&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;security,&amp;quot; and to the conservative base.  In order to complete the rout, they needed a &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; figurehead to completely disband the rest, one whose base would not be disturbed.  I will make one note which will say this all, that BOTH parties are complicit in all the outrages, that is this last outrage, NDAA which completed the cancellation of the bill of rights, Posse Comitatus, Habeas Corpus, 4th and 5th Amendments.  This was passed a few weeks ago by a CLEAR MAJORITY OF BOTH HOUSES. If no other volley across our bow demonstrates that the GOP is as complicit in the takedown of our nation, this alone should do it.   </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 04:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268318278</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : AP source: ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268317960</link>
<description>I DO believe your mistrust is well placed.  Did media choose BHO?  You answered your own question by noting their lies of ommission.  If you recall, as truth came out, they also buried it.  Combine that with the GOP refusal to address the issues prior, at best they paid lip service, yes, media did what the machine told them.     </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 04:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268317960</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : AP source: ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268317555</link>
<description>BTW, there is only ONE candidate on record against the NDAA, all others defend it.  That is Ron Paul.  On this account alone, he should get everyone&amp;#039;s vote.  That he is also pledged to get us out of the UN is another.  Every candidate up there is the machine candidate, the machine that voted for NDAA.    As for myself, I am neither suicidal nor suicidal for my nation.  I will vote Ron Paul.  Whether he gets the GOP nod, or not.  He has a decades old voting record that is not only consisitently constitutional, has never voted to raise taxes, he is anathema to the machine.  We need the voice of opposition in DC.    </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 04:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268317555</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : AP source: ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268306554</link>
<description>Santorum is a closet liberal.  His big gov&amp;#039;t voting, his votes against the promises made to his constituents is what got him tossed as their Pa. Rep. years ago.  He may have dusted off the old image and reconstituted a new &amp;quot;speech,:&amp;quot; but ask the good people of Pa. just how conservative he really is and how what he says during the campaign does not translate to what he does, in office.   </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268306554</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : AP source: ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268304435</link>
<description>I disagree.  The DC machine owns the media, they control the media, who controls the media controls the message and with it, far too many minds.  There is a great underground source of info on the net, if you look.  You might not realize it but the machine of BOTH parties in DC certainly do, hense their insistence on SOPA.   </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268304435</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : AP source: ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268300717</link>
<description>There are loads of other reasons not to want Gingrich, it&amp;#039;s all a matter of historic and voting record.  Elect him?  We should be talking about indicting him.  For treason among other things.  That&amp;#039;s what the record dictates.  Romney is ineligble, will the truthers remain consistent for a GOP candidate?  The establishment candidates are worse than flawed they all promise business as usual in DC, big gov&amp;#039;t., big spending, just different hands out and recipients.  Regards his ex wife, have we not learned THAT lesson after Clinton?  If someone has the moral vacuum that would allow him screw his wife then how well does that bode for their reluctance to screw us all?  Honor, integrity, trust are all earned and all consistent.  You can&amp;#039;t be a saint in some areas and a dog in others.  The dog rules and sooner or later, can not help but get out. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268300717</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : AP source: ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268298261</link>
<description>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!  Thanks for the chuckle.  That&amp;#039;s funny! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268298261</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : NYT Gets Vapors Over Justice Scalia and Tea Party Seminar</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2010/12/23/nyt-gets-vapors-over-justice-scalia-and-tea-party-seminar/#IDComment117825792</link>
<description>:-)))   We in NJ grassroots are doing exactly that in 2011, sovereign state intitiative, organizing by town, we look to nullify illegal mandates illegal spending at town level and since all 120 legislators in state are on the ballot, right now recruiting w/an eye on getting a majority of advocates to restore constitutional law in this state.  If we succeed, we will take back our rightful power to nullify illegal mandates and spending out of DC, impeach and toss &amp;quot;legislate from the bench judges.  Bachmann, the RINOs and Dems willbe marginalized right back into that little box called enumerated powers.  I think you and I and we are on the same page. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2010/12/23/nyt-gets-vapors-over-justice-scalia-and-tea-party-seminar/#IDComment117825792</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : NYT Gets Vapors Over Justice Scalia and Tea Party Seminar</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2010/12/23/nyt-gets-vapors-over-justice-scalia-and-tea-party-seminar/#IDComment117757553</link>
<description>Rob Pietrie: To aswer your question,  I suppose not that far from me.  &amp;quot;Commerce with all, alliances with none.&amp;quot;  ~~ Thomas Jefferson.  That is not radically differnent in your expessed sentiment,  &amp;quot;reject the notion that we should close ourselves off economically from the rest of the world. &amp;quot; For 200 years we operated in a true capitalist system and became the strongest, free-est nation in history.  What is happening now is not captialist system. I mentiond the CFR, an outlaw oganization dedicated to world governance and global economy, no borders.  Please follow the link, a speech given by Richard Haass, their president and would likely been named McCains foreign adv. had he been elected, see what the CFR thinks of preserving our sovereign nation, in relation to the global governance they are fast installing.   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2006/02/21/2003294021&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archiv...&lt;/a&gt;  I don&amp;#039;t think either of us want to sacrifice our sovereign nation and make ANY part subjugated to UN, World Court, etc.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 04:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2010/12/23/nyt-gets-vapors-over-justice-scalia-and-tea-party-seminar/#IDComment117757553</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : NYT Gets Vapors Over Justice Scalia and Tea Party Seminar</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2010/12/23/nyt-gets-vapors-over-justice-scalia-and-tea-party-seminar/#IDComment117750286</link>
<description>One by one they have dismantled the Bill of Rights.  Our silence is compliance.  It is time to change that status quo. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2010/12/23/nyt-gets-vapors-over-justice-scalia-and-tea-party-seminar/#IDComment117750286</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : NYT Gets Vapors Over Justice Scalia and Tea Party Seminar</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2010/12/23/nyt-gets-vapors-over-justice-scalia-and-tea-party-seminar/#IDComment117750144</link>
<description>Scott Garrett, GOP Congressman from NJ had that same reply when a member of my TPP group asked hi that same question. The question is how long we will remain silent as they dissolve our system.   The TPP grassroots has risen and we are working to restore.  We are not in the business of negoiating away any constitutional right, contruct, provsion.   The system no longer exists in DC and we can&amp;#039;t work within a non-existent system.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2010/12/23/nyt-gets-vapors-over-justice-scalia-and-tea-party-seminar/#IDComment117750144</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : NYT Gets Vapors Over Justice Scalia and Tea Party Seminar</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2010/12/23/nyt-gets-vapors-over-justice-scalia-and-tea-party-seminar/#IDComment117749536</link>
<description>We agree on point, restoration.  It seems to me then, that the one line we must draw in the sand is constitutional system, law, letter and spirit.  More, we are in his position today because we accepted half measures and less.  We the people are the 5th balance of power.  Our mandate is to demand and defend the constituionand our nation. Those in office, either side, who go over that line should be smacked back, not let off because they didn&amp;#039;t go asfar as the other side.  I am certain that the founders would have not bartered or weakened any inalienable right, just the other day now, by unanimous vote, including the GOP voted to set the tomato police after us.   Any who overstep their authority limited to the enumerated powers is guilty and we must all say, Unacceptable, NON-NEGOTIABLE.&amp;quot;  I don&amp;#039;t say it.  The founders did </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2010/12/23/nyt-gets-vapors-over-justice-scalia-and-tea-party-seminar/#IDComment117749536</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : NYT Gets Vapors Over Justice Scalia and Tea Party Seminar</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2010/12/23/nyt-gets-vapors-over-justice-scalia-and-tea-party-seminar/#IDComment117748851</link>
<description>She votes against reducing H1-B visas 2/3 of the time and for free trade agreements 85% of the time, the one in my mind now is the recent one w/Peru.  She vote against trade barriers most often, as well  Please don&amp;#039;t ask me forth HR #&amp;#039;s, my info is cumulative from watching and checking, I don&amp;#039;t print it all up and file it.  A google should do ya. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2010/12/23/nyt-gets-vapors-over-justice-scalia-and-tea-party-seminar/#IDComment117748851</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : NYT Gets Vapors Over Justice Scalia and Tea Party Seminar</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2010/12/23/nyt-gets-vapors-over-justice-scalia-and-tea-party-seminar/#IDComment117748314</link>
<description>BTW, the only way you are capable of putting it is layman&amp;#039;s terms. When all you have is eptithets, then you divulge you have nothing else. Gee, I thought it was a liberal thng, the politics of personal destruction. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 02:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2010/12/23/nyt-gets-vapors-over-justice-scalia-and-tea-party-seminar/#IDComment117748314</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>