<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1492445</link>
		<description>Comments by jreiling99</description>
<item>
<title>John Jonas Blog : Outsourcing Online Research</title>
<link>http://www.jonasblog.com/2009/03/outsourcing-online-research.html#IDComment89155953</link>
<description>Based on some of the training you provide on how you identify good keywords, I used the Commerical Intent tool last night.  I was getting results that just did not make sense to me.  The numbers seemed all over the place, I did not see the relatisihi-p between reading that were commerical vs non-commercial, and my intuition was being challenged.  So much so that I researched for reviews on the tool.  This is telltale:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://newsletter.blizzardinternet.com/commercial-intent-detection-tool-review/2008/05/10/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://newsletter.blizzardinternet.com/commercial...&lt;/a&gt;  Based on my experience, I seriously question the Commercial Intent tool. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jonasblog.com/2009/03/outsourcing-online-research.html#IDComment89155953</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>