<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1462507</link>
		<description>Comments by johnrf12</description>
<item>
<title>Big Hollywood : In Which I Defend Keith Olbermann From Jon Stewart&#039;s Sanctimony</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2010/10/31/in-which-i-defend-keith-olbermann-from-jon-stewarts-sanctimony/#IDComment107273717</link>
<description>You sir have lost your mind. Socialism?  How silly.  Calm down. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Nov 2010 02:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2010/10/31/in-which-i-defend-keith-olbermann-from-jon-stewarts-sanctimony/#IDComment107273717</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Sen. Kerry Predicts ‘Ice-Free Arctic&#039; In &#039;5 or 10 Years’ </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/sen-kerry-predicts-ice-free-arctic-in-5-or-10-years/#IDComment88677215</link>
<description>Yes by all means let&amp;#039;s take our information from the oil companies.  They couldn&amp;#039;t have a hidden agenda right?   Hedge fund manager Jeremy Grantham, who in his July letter to investors, noted: &amp;ldquo;Conspiracy theorists claim to believe that global warming is a carefully constructed hoax driven by scientists desperate for ... what? Being needled by nonscientific newspaper reports, by blogs and by right-wing politicians and think tanks? I have a much simpler but plausible &amp;lsquo;conspiracy theory&amp;rsquo;: the fossil energy companies, driven by the need to protect hundreds of billions of dollars of profits, encourage obfuscation of the inconvenient scientific results. I, for one, admire them for their P.R. skills, while wondering, as always: &amp;ldquo;Have they no grandchildren?&amp;rdquo; </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 14:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/sen-kerry-predicts-ice-free-arctic-in-5-or-10-years/#IDComment88677215</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Sen. Kerry Predicts ‘Ice-Free Arctic&#039; In &#039;5 or 10 Years’ </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/sen-kerry-predicts-ice-free-arctic-in-5-or-10-years/#IDComment88676968</link>
<description> hedge fund manager Jeremy Grantham, who in his July letter to investors, noted: &amp;ldquo;Conspiracy theorists claim to believe that global warming is a carefully constructed hoax driven by scientists desperate for ... what? Being needled by nonscientific newspaper reports, by blogs and by right-wing politicians and think tanks? I have a much simpler but plausible &amp;lsquo;conspiracy theory&amp;rsquo;: the fossil energy companies, driven by the need to protect hundreds of billions of dollars of profits, encourage obfuscation of the inconvenient scientific results. I, for one, admire them for their P.R. skills, while wondering, as always: &amp;ldquo;Have they no grandchildren?&amp;rdquo; Have you fools here have not grandchildren or just no intelligence? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 14:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/sen-kerry-predicts-ice-free-arctic-in-5-or-10-years/#IDComment88676968</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Breitbart to CNN&#039;s King:  It&#039;s Not About Shirley Sherrod It&#039;s About NAACP Attacking Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-to-cnns-king-itd-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment88477786</link>
<description>Except Andrew is still lying and you&amp;#039;re still taking him at his word without checking out the video.  For a real analysis of the video:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2261552/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.slate.com/id/2261552/&lt;/a&gt;  Now what? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 11:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-to-cnns-king-itd-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment88477786</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Breitbart to CNN&#039;s King:  It&#039;s Not About Shirley Sherrod It&#039;s About NAACP Attacking Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-to-cnns-king-itd-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment88477569</link>
<description>Yes all the racists are hiding behind Andrew.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2261552/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.slate.com/id/2261552/&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 11:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-to-cnns-king-itd-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment88477569</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Breitbart to CNN&#039;s King:  It&#039;s Not About Shirley Sherrod It&#039;s About NAACP Attacking Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-to-cnns-king-itd-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment88477525</link>
<description>Yes lying has its consequences.  Andrew keeps lying and you keep taking the hook, line and sinker.  So sad. Here&amp;#039;e the truth. Bet you can&amp;#039;t handle it.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2261552/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.slate.com/id/2261552/&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 11:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-to-cnns-king-itd-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment88477525</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Breitbart to CNN&#039;s King:  It&#039;s Not About Shirley Sherrod It&#039;s About NAACP Attacking Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-to-cnns-king-itd-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment88477364</link>
<description>Andrew tricked you again.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2261552/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.slate.com/id/2261552/&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 11:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-to-cnns-king-itd-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment88477364</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv :     Coulter: Media Make Sherrod a Saint But Still Smear Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88475205</link>
<description>So you hate America so much that you vote for a woman for president who is so obviously unqualified.  A person obviously unbalanced for VP and an evil comedienne for speaker? Wow, you&amp;#039;re a real American.   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 10:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88475205</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv :     Coulter: Media Make Sherrod a Saint But Still Smear Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88475032</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t think she&amp;#039;s stupid.  She has found a niche wherein she can make stupid statements and a bunch of intellectually challenged fans will make her rich.  That might be immoral but it ain&amp;#039;t stupid.   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 10:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88475032</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv :     Coulter: Media Make Sherrod a Saint But Still Smear Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88474801</link>
<description>The video clearly shares a personal story of redemption.  Sherrod saved the farm!  Brietbart never suspected that the farmer would still be alive.   She was not a public official at the time, as you should already know. No one applauded.  This Brietbart told you that and you believed him without checking it out for yourself. Number 5:  Did you just make this up or did your hero BrightBart? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 10:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88474801</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv :     Coulter: Media Make Sherrod a Saint But Still Smear Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88474288</link>
<description>Actually there is no such thing on the tape.  This newest lie has already been exposed.  Cheering, snickering etc.  It&amp;#039;s  not there!  Listen again, perhaps take off your aluminum foil hat before listening, don&amp;#039;t worry you&amp;#039;ll be ok if you just take it off for a few minutes.   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 10:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88474288</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv :     Coulter: Media Make Sherrod a Saint But Still Smear Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88474004</link>
<description>Ann always comes loaded with something but it is not facts.  I did not know she was still around.  She the closest thing the right wing has to a comedienne.   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 10:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88474004</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv :     Coulter: Media Make Sherrod a Saint But Still Smear Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88473844</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve seen the tapes of this name calling of our representatives.  Are you really accusing these people of lying?  Obviously you learned Goebbels technique and thought you could pull it here.  Watch the tapes again.  It is obvious what is going on.  And is it really that surprising that there were some in that mob that would resort to such slanders? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 10:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88473844</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Breitbart to CNN&#039;s King:  It&#039;s Not About Shirley Sherrod It&#039;s About NAACP Attacking Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-to-cnns-king-itd-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment88472614</link>
<description>You really don&amp;#039;t see the difference between being a former racist and a current racist?  Really? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 10:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-to-cnns-king-itd-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment88472614</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Breitbart to CNN&#039;s King:  It&#039;s Not About Shirley Sherrod It&#039;s About NAACP Attacking Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-to-cnns-king-itd-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment88472456</link>
<description>And yet she saved their farm.  It must have really shaken you guys up when the farmers came forward.  I&amp;#039;m sure BrightBart was shocked. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 10:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-to-cnns-king-itd-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment88472456</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Breitbart to CNN&#039;s King:  It&#039;s Not About Shirley Sherrod It&#039;s About NAACP Attacking Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-to-cnns-king-itd-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment88472232</link>
<description>Is Rev. Wright a member of the NAACP? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 10:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-to-cnns-king-itd-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment88472232</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Breitbart to CNN&#039;s King:  It&#039;s Not About Shirley Sherrod It&#039;s About NAACP Attacking Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-to-cnns-king-itd-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment88471635</link>
<description>Please, The Daily Show is not pretending to be a news show.  They are a comedy show.  And when I watch they made fun of both sides.  But notice they are on the &amp;quot;Comedy&amp;quot; Network not _________ &amp;quot;News&amp;quot;. MSNBC might look biased but only because they report the opposite of Faux News.  It used to be called &amp;quot;the truth&amp;quot;, now it&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;biased&amp;quot;. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 10:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-to-cnns-king-itd-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment88471635</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Breitbart to CNN&#039;s King:  It&#039;s Not About Shirley Sherrod It&#039;s About NAACP Attacking Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-to-cnns-king-itd-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment88471209</link>
<description>but of course you know that when she gave the speech she was not a government employee.  Right? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 10:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-to-cnns-king-itd-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment88471209</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Debunking Media Myths of Sherrod Story</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/debunking-media-myths-of-sherrod-story/#IDComment88288318</link>
<description>What?!  Don&amp;#039;t blame bush for destroying our country because he&amp;#039;s white?  Are you joking?  Should we blame bush&amp;#039;s mistakes on someone else?  Oh wait, I forgot, bush kept our country safe for.......less than 9 months.  So Obama has already beaten bush on his biggest accomplishment.  Reagan was still blaming Carter in his second term.    Why shouldn&amp;#039;t everyone discuss the fact that bush is the worst president of all time?  Would it hurt his feelings?  It will probably take Obama well into his second term before he has cleaned up after the WORST PRESIDENT IN THE HISTORY OF OUR NATION.  Stop trying to change history.  Even the republicans admitted prior to the last election that bush was a failure.  Now I see a movement to rehabilitate him.  Too soon, WAY TO SOON,  to even try.  Did you vote twice for the worst president in history?  Shame on you.  Did you then vote for an old confused man and a totally unqualified first term governor to replace your failure of a president?  Shame again. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/debunking-media-myths-of-sherrod-story/#IDComment88288318</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Debunking Media Myths of Sherrod Story</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/debunking-media-myths-of-sherrod-story/#IDComment88286370</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t think it is fair to compare an academy award winning filmmaker with this piece of trash breitbart.  Be serious.  Moore makes films, great films, this guy runs a worthless dishonest website. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/debunking-media-myths-of-sherrod-story/#IDComment88286370</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>