en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/589119 Comments by joearnold http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2009/pair-programming-should-be-co-programming/#IDComment25521503 We at one point experimented with n-brain&#039;s una (<a href="http://www.n-brain.net)," target="_blank">http://www.n-brain.net),</a> but it didn&#039;t fit our needs at the time. You might want to check it out. Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:52:06 +0000 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2009/pair-programming-should-be-co-programming/#IDComment25521503 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2009/pair-programming-should-be-co-programming/#IDComment25521112 Indeed it does! Also, keep a bottle of sanitizer handy! Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:46:20 +0000 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2009/pair-programming-should-be-co-programming/#IDComment25521112 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2009/pair-programming-should-be-co-programming/#IDComment25521028 We customize emacs. Two people on the team (both happen to be named Sam) push the customizations. See: Sam Merritt&#039;s <a href="http://github.com/smerritt/spiffy-elisp/tree/master" target="_blank">http://github.com/smerritt/spiffy-elisp/tree/mast...</a> Also check out Sam Tesla&#039;s recent post showing how emacs can be used to create a programming environment: <a href="http://blog.alieniloquent.com/2009/06/25/an-example-of-defadvice-in-emacs/" target="_blank">http://blog.alieniloquent.com/2009/06/25/an-examp...</a> Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:45:04 +0000 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2009/pair-programming-should-be-co-programming/#IDComment25521028