<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/327243</link>
		<description>Comments by jmckinne</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Tax the rich? GOP candidates say no way</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SH0D980&show_article=1#IDComment275527730</link>
<description>Love the new agenda driven reporting AP! One problem here tho, if the rich pay the same &amp;quot;share of their income as those at lower rungs&amp;quot;  that would mean they get a tax cut because they already pay more. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 03:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SH0D980&show_article=1#IDComment275527730</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : &#039;30 Rock&#039; Actor Tracy Morgan Proclaims on National Television: Sarah Palin is &#039;Good Masturbation Mat</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/30-rock-actor-tracy-morgan-on-sarah-palin-good-masturbation-material/#IDComment124260573</link>
<description>Obviously a plant. Look at the cheezy moniker. Welcome to the forum Mr Soros. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 05:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/30-rock-actor-tracy-morgan-on-sarah-palin-good-masturbation-material/#IDComment124260573</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Coulter: &#039;I&#039;m With the Tea Partiers&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-im-with-the-tea-partiers/#IDComment107406088</link>
<description>LOL, now that&amp;#039;s a good one. You must have seen it on the break room bulletin board at Media Matters. The MSM catering to the rightwing...bawahaaa! Makes my day... well that and voting against every donkey on my ballot. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Nov 2010 18:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-im-with-the-tea-partiers/#IDComment107406088</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Beck Taking Medical Leave</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/beck-taking-medical-leave/#IDComment103013806</link>
<description>How about generic statments like &amp;quot;Hope and Change&amp;quot;? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Oct 2010 17:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/beck-taking-medical-leave/#IDComment103013806</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Doomsday warnings of US apocalypse gain ground</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.a64b6fa820c23d9ef2058a22276ce3a1.2c1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment98604573</link>
<description>Guys I hate the AP as much as the next guy, but this is AFP: Agency France Press. Which is even worse than the AP :)   They do fail to mention the &amp;quot;Nobel Prize Winner&amp;quot; Krugman is also a left wing-nut, and it is a glaring ommision. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.a64b6fa820c23d9ef2058a22276ce3a1.2c1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment98604573</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : NBC Continues to Attack Palin</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/nbc-continues-to-attack-on-palin/#IDComment84466562</link>
<description>Nobody hates NBC more than me, and the Today show especially. This time tho I&amp;#039;m not seeing it as an outrageous amoutn of bias. At least they weren&amp;#039;t callign her stupid this time. They were hinting she was cashing in, but that&amp;#039;s what smart people do. They also mentions she&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;polarizing&amp;quot; but that&amp;#039;s only because of the attacks they run on her 24/7/365. I think it&amp;#039;s just funny really. Like the mythical Rascally Republican they just can&amp;#039;t seem to kill her. She just keeps popping up and eating from their garden. Honestly we couldn&amp;#039;t have invented a better chew toy for the media dimwits. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 3 Jul 2010 03:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/nbc-continues-to-attack-on-palin/#IDComment84466562</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Daily Gut: Why I Love Charlie Sheen</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/09/10/daily-gut-why-i-love-charlie-sheen/#IDComment33931998</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Lt. Col. Kwiatkowski has an MA in Government from Harvard University and an MS in Science Management from the University of Alaska. She has a PhD in World Politics from The Catholic University of America;&amp;quot;  I&amp;#039;m sure her parents are proud, but there is not one shred of engineering in any of her education or practical works. Her Wiki: &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karen_Kwiatkowski&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karen_Kwiatkowski&lt;/a&gt;  The engineering &amp;quot;facts&amp;quot; she gives have all been extensively debunked by actual engineers and crash scene investigators. Oh, and she&amp;#039;s also regarded as a loon in the scientific community. But you, her, and Oliver Stone would make a nice dinner troika.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 02:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/09/10/daily-gut-why-i-love-charlie-sheen/#IDComment33931998</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Daily Gut: Why I Love Charlie Sheen</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/09/10/daily-gut-why-i-love-charlie-sheen/#IDComment33931465</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve now read that story 3 times Bill and in no way does it ever say that any of the commishioners believed their report was a fraud. In fact the threatned charges were never brought because they eventually got the answers they wanted and the report reflected their take on those answers. The opinions given also reflect only one commisioner. The story was about their aggravation AT THE TIME.   Next time take the blue pill...?  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 02:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/09/10/daily-gut-why-i-love-charlie-sheen/#IDComment33931465</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Daily Gut: Why I Love Charlie Sheen</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/09/10/daily-gut-why-i-love-charlie-sheen/#IDComment33929039</link>
<description>Bill you&amp;#039;re out of your noggin, seriously. I&amp;#039;ve now followed that link too, and it&amp;#039;s an even bigger howler than your first one.   You are quoting the opinions of 41 people who worked at the very agencies that the commision blamed in large part for 9/11. Those people are - SURPRISE!!! - not too pleased with the commision&amp;#039;s report. I never would have seen that coming.   The very first one - a Foggy Bottom employee - immediately jumps into areas he knows nothing about and starts spouting non-sensical engineering falsehoods. Here he is in his own words:   &amp;quot;I&amp;#039;m not satisfied by the notion that planes hitting buildings constructed as these would have caused them to collapse. The last building to fall was not even attacked. &amp;hellip; The sheer mechanics of the event. The chances of two buildings of that height and structure merely collapsing in their own footprint are extremely slim.&amp;rdquo; He also stated, &amp;ldquo;There is a lot of work in getting sixteen people ready to commit voluntary and simultaneous suicide. The case has not been made.&amp;quot;   He&amp;#039;s not just a moron, he&amp;#039;s a moron without a television set, or a history book. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 02:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/09/10/daily-gut-why-i-love-charlie-sheen/#IDComment33929039</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Daily Gut: Why I Love Charlie Sheen</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/09/10/daily-gut-why-i-love-charlie-sheen/#IDComment33927028</link>
<description>I read your first link Bill and it was a dooz. You quoted a story on a left wing website interviewing an anti-Bush democrat. In the interview the BDS suffering democrat offered his opinion that the commission had a hard time with the Bush administration. You referenced that article as &amp;quot;proving&amp;quot; that the commision members thot their findings were a fraud. Slight problem: not even the leftists chatting in the interview made that suggestion, let alone the commision members. You&amp;#039;re reading whatever you need into any story you see. Just like seeing smoke puffs on the grassy knoll. There is a certain percentage of people that just NEED to think they are onto &amp;quot;the big secret&amp;quot; and everybody else is missing it. Well here&amp;#039;s a tip Bill: The Matrix was just a freakin movie. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 01:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/09/10/daily-gut-why-i-love-charlie-sheen/#IDComment33927028</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Did You Hear About the Morgans Trashing Sarah Palin?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bighollywood/2009/08/19/did-you-hear-about-the-morgans-trashing-sarah-palin/#IDComment31248132</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m going to give this one a pass. It was a light enough joke, and it was as much on them as Palin.   On the plus side it at least looks like this movie may be about a &amp;quot;sophisticated&amp;quot; urban couple trying (and suceeding?) to work it out and stay together. If that&amp;#039;s how the story plays it&amp;#039;s actually a good family message as opposed to the usual divorce as a badge of honor stuff Hollywood usually does. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bighollywood/2009/08/19/did-you-hear-about-the-morgans-trashing-sarah-palin/#IDComment31248132</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Daily Gut: Thank the Popping Doll</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/05/14/daily-gut-thank-the-popping-doll/#IDComment21493652</link>
<description>We don&amp;#039;t want her out! She&amp;#039;ll be worth 30 seats to us in 2010. We need her there, making sure the left keeps overreaching. Thanks Nancy you addle-brained gift you! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 03:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/05/14/daily-gut-thank-the-popping-doll/#IDComment21493652</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : British MPs expense X-rated movies, horse manure</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D982ADTO2#IDComment21110849</link>
<description>Ron Paul is Libertarian and Perot isn&amp;#039;t GOP - he&amp;#039;s WTF. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 9 May 2009 04:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D982ADTO2#IDComment21110849</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : British MPs expense X-rated movies, horse manure</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D982ADTO2#IDComment21100073</link>
<description>Because it&amp;#039;s funny as hell.. unless you&amp;#039;re a British Taxpayer. The fact that Jacqui Smith thinks it&amp;#039;s ok to censure Micheal Savage but ok for her hubby to expense porn is also a howler. I wonder when she &amp;quot;repaid&amp;quot; that and what her explanation was, lol. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 9 May 2009 00:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D982ADTO2#IDComment21100073</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &ldquo;NewsBusted&rdquo; 4/10/09 &mdash; Fake News from the Right</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/epeterkofsky/2009/04/10/&ldquo;newsbusted&rdquo;-41009-&mdash;-fake-news-from-the-right/#IDComment18546784</link>
<description>x2 On all your comments Jack.   The laugh track just sounds desperate. Your &amp;quot;faux panel&amp;quot; idea sounds great too. The Onion&amp;#039;s show is a good model.   I for one would be willing to sit thru a (brief) ad for upgraded production values and a little more length. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 05:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/epeterkofsky/2009/04/10/&ldquo;newsbusted&rdquo;-41009-&mdash;-fake-news-from-the-right/#IDComment18546784</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Obama&#039;s Need To Control Starts With Destroying Limbaugh</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jromano/2009/03/05/barrack-limbaugh/#IDComment16413461</link>
<description>&amp;quot;..acted more like the people they claim to be (i.e. fiscally responsible, honest, moral, etc...), McCain may have had a chance to win.....or at least Obama wouldn&amp;#039;t have ...&amp;quot;  That&amp;#039;s  my point Des, except minus the McCain part, who I don&amp;#039;t like and you seem too. McCain was NEVER going to win this race period. The MSM was not going to let that happen, and we could have run the Easter Bunny for President and it wouldn&amp;#039;t have made any difference.  My comment about RINOS pertained to the congress, and I agree 100% that if they had acted like fiscal grownups (real conservatives) we might still have 1 chamber, or at least be able to fillibuster and not have to worry about how Arlen and Olympia are going to go. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Mar 2009 22:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jromano/2009/03/05/barrack-limbaugh/#IDComment16413461</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Obama&#039;s Need To Control Starts With Destroying Limbaugh</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jromano/2009/03/05/barrack-limbaugh/#IDComment16385413</link>
<description>And if you think he&amp;#039;s bad, have you tried listening to Keith Olberman? Olby&amp;#039;s cancer makes Rush look like a benign growth. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Mar 2009 17:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jromano/2009/03/05/barrack-limbaugh/#IDComment16385413</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Obama&#039;s Need To Control Starts With Destroying Limbaugh</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jromano/2009/03/05/barrack-limbaugh/#IDComment16384603</link>
<description>Hey now! Leave me out of this. I&amp;#039;m still in double secret retirement somewhere. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Mar 2009 17:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jromano/2009/03/05/barrack-limbaugh/#IDComment16384603</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Obama&#039;s Need To Control Starts With Destroying Limbaugh</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jromano/2009/03/05/barrack-limbaugh/#IDComment16283605</link>
<description>Let me preface this by saying I&amp;#039;ve never liked McCain. I&amp;#039;ve always thot he was erratic as hell, and on balance just a glory seeker. He would say anything to get attaboys from his buddies in the MSM. His education about what it means to be a Republican running  against a Democrat at the hands of the MSM was a guilty pleasure for me, but I digress...  In October, when the financial meltdown came, I thought McCain was clearly erratic :rolleyes: while Obama kept his cool. In hindsight:  1) McCain knew what the hell was going on (and coming) and was justifiably freaked. Obama was just clueless. 2) Obama was thrilled. Here was his chance to use &amp;quot;crisis&amp;quot; to force a lurch to the left. Premeditated  or not, this is what has happened.  I don&amp;#039;t like either option, and the country is getting butt boy&amp;#039;ed too. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Mar 2009 10:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jromano/2009/03/05/barrack-limbaugh/#IDComment16283605</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Obama&#039;s Need To Control Starts With Destroying Limbaugh</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jromano/2009/03/05/barrack-limbaugh/#IDComment16283343</link>
<description>Yes he did gesticulate....on a radio show. He does not play to the web cam, it just sits there. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Mar 2009 10:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jromano/2009/03/05/barrack-limbaugh/#IDComment16283343</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>