<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/2632642</link>
		<description>Comments by jjoyce22</description>
<item>
<title>Big Journalism : Progressives Target Rush Limbaugh Over SlutGate</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dhunter/2012/03/04/progressives-target-rush-limbaugh-over-slutgate/#IDComment308221083</link>
<description>But heaven forbid she would be called a slut. That would be unforgivable. (sarc/off) </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Mar 2012 01:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dhunter/2012/03/04/progressives-target-rush-limbaugh-over-slutgate/#IDComment308221083</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Progressives Target Rush Limbaugh Over SlutGate</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dhunter/2012/03/04/progressives-target-rush-limbaugh-over-slutgate/#IDComment308218002</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m having the same problem. Spend 15 minutes venting via a well-phrased comment just to have it disappear in the ether is pretty annoying. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Mar 2012 01:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dhunter/2012/03/04/progressives-target-rush-limbaugh-over-slutgate/#IDComment308218002</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Progressives Target Rush Limbaugh Over SlutGate</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dhunter/2012/03/04/progressives-target-rush-limbaugh-over-slutgate/#IDComment308191853</link>
<description>I love unicorns and rainbows! (Just checking to see if I can get a comment in without getting it yanked.) </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Mar 2012 00:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dhunter/2012/03/04/progressives-target-rush-limbaugh-over-slutgate/#IDComment308191853</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Progressives Target Rush Limbaugh Over SlutGate</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dhunter/2012/03/04/progressives-target-rush-limbaugh-over-slutgate/#IDComment308190949</link>
<description>Swastika flag aside, this is a very entertaining steam of posts you&amp;#039;ve got going here. :) </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Mar 2012 00:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dhunter/2012/03/04/progressives-target-rush-limbaugh-over-slutgate/#IDComment308190949</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Olympia Snowe to Retire from Senate</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/02/28/olympia-snowe-to-retire-from-senate/#IDComment304151684</link>
<description>Worst case scenario, we get someone in there who&amp;#039;ll have the integrity to stab us in the front as opposed to the back. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/02/28/olympia-snowe-to-retire-from-senate/#IDComment304151684</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Spotted at the Oscars: Movie Stars Desperate to Avoid Talking Politics</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/27/spotted-at-the-oscars-movie-stars-desperate-to-avoid-talking-politics/#IDComment303448581</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Black Lib&amp;quot;: I think we have the epitome of a redundancy there. Now you just need to work on making sense. Doll. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/27/spotted-at-the-oscars-movie-stars-desperate-to-avoid-talking-politics/#IDComment303448581</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Liberals Hate Mormons</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2012/02/24/liberals-hate-mormons/#IDComment301430325</link>
<description>Figures. You must need to be right there in Nevada to catch any news like that. The msm certainly isn&amp;#039;t going to pick up any of those stories and go national with them even though they are completely relevant to what they&amp;#039;ve already determined to be part of a national dialogue. Hypocrisy on parade as usual.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 17:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2012/02/24/liberals-hate-mormons/#IDComment301430325</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Liberals Hate Mormons</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2012/02/24/liberals-hate-mormons/#IDComment300892166</link>
<description>One of the big problems the libs will have with bashing Romney&amp;#039;s mormonism is that their very own leader of the senate is a mormon. If they bash Romney, they bash their own senate leader Reid. How is a mormon perfectly fine and more than acceptable as their own leader but it would be anathema for the other side to have one? This is the type of disgusting pretzels these guys twist themselves into when they practice such disgusting hypocrisy and do-or-say-anything methods of getting ahead politically. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 23:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2012/02/24/liberals-hate-mormons/#IDComment300892166</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Liberals Hate Mormons</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2012/02/24/liberals-hate-mormons/#IDComment300889287</link>
<description>Oh yeah. That&amp;#039;s going to be fun to watch Reid squirm when all this Mormon-bashing really starts to hit the fan if and when Romney gets the nomination. Let&amp;#039;s see if Reid places his religious faith above politics or if political advantage is more important to him. But from what I&amp;#039;ve seen of Reid, I think I already have a good idea of how that&amp;#039;s going to go. In fact I wouldn&amp;#039;t even put it past Reid to figure out some way of piling on.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 23:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2012/02/24/liberals-hate-mormons/#IDComment300889287</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Liberals Hate Mormons</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2012/02/24/liberals-hate-mormons/#IDComment300886302</link>
<description>You make way too much sense kobesmom. Which is why it won&amp;#039;t fly with so many blind people. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 23:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2012/02/24/liberals-hate-mormons/#IDComment300886302</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : NYT&#039;s Charles Blow Mocks Romney&#039;s &quot;Magic Underwear&quot;</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/23/nyts-charles-blow-mocks-romneys-magic-underwear/#IDComment300723420</link>
<description>@Incitatus; Yes, we&amp;#039;ve got your point. But you seem to be missing ours. So join us and we&amp;#039;ll all just relax. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/23/nyts-charles-blow-mocks-romneys-magic-underwear/#IDComment300723420</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : NYT&#039;s Charles Blow Mocks Romney&#039;s &quot;Magic Underwear&quot;</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/23/nyts-charles-blow-mocks-romneys-magic-underwear/#IDComment300630161</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Not really&amp;quot; ?  Not sure what your point is. Lots of religions don&amp;#039;t have any &amp;quot;particular sacred garments or the like.&amp;quot; Doesn&amp;#039;t change the fact that many do.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/23/nyts-charles-blow-mocks-romneys-magic-underwear/#IDComment300630161</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Wanderlust&#039; Review: Moldy Hippie Gags Populate Commune Comedy</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kloder/2012/02/24/wanderlust-review-moldy-hippie-gags-populate-commune-comedy/#IDComment300627296</link>
<description>How long can Aniston play essentially the same character in movie after movie after movie? With as much ambition as she obviously has you&amp;#039;d think she&amp;#039;d be looking for a bit more quality than quantity.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kloder/2012/02/24/wanderlust-review-moldy-hippie-gags-populate-commune-comedy/#IDComment300627296</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : NYT&#039;s Charles Blow Mocks Romney&#039;s &quot;Magic Underwear&quot;</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/23/nyts-charles-blow-mocks-romneys-magic-underwear/#IDComment300198570</link>
<description>True.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/23/nyts-charles-blow-mocks-romneys-magic-underwear/#IDComment300198570</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : NYT&#039;s Charles Blow Mocks Romney&#039;s &quot;Magic Underwear&quot;</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/23/nyts-charles-blow-mocks-romneys-magic-underwear/#IDComment300197436</link>
<description>Excellent response! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/23/nyts-charles-blow-mocks-romneys-magic-underwear/#IDComment300197436</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : NYT&#039;s Charles Blow Mocks Romney&#039;s &quot;Magic Underwear&quot;</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/23/nyts-charles-blow-mocks-romneys-magic-underwear/#IDComment300165660</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t get the big deal here. The guy fits right in at the &amp;#039;venerable&amp;#039; NYT. Are we expecting anything more from these people? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 01:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/23/nyts-charles-blow-mocks-romneys-magic-underwear/#IDComment300165660</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : NYT&#039;s Charles Blow Mocks Romney&#039;s &quot;Magic Underwear&quot;</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/23/nyts-charles-blow-mocks-romneys-magic-underwear/#IDComment300164559</link>
<description>A little over-thinking there. Her declasse reference was referring to the classless guy. But considering your personal take on the word&amp;#039;s use, exactly how many times do you have to utter an utterly classless statement before you are officially &amp;#039;declasse&amp;#039;? 2 times? 5 times? Personally, I think the FIRST time anyone who intentionally utters such a bigoted, mocking and disparaging comment to hurt another person immediately falls from any respectful social standing they may have had prior. The term applies perfectly to Blow here. That is, if he had any sort of social status before this. (Never heard of the jerk before now.) </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 01:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/23/nyts-charles-blow-mocks-romneys-magic-underwear/#IDComment300164559</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : NYT&#039;s Charles Blow Mocks Romney&#039;s &quot;Magic Underwear&quot;</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/23/nyts-charles-blow-mocks-romneys-magic-underwear/#IDComment300158065</link>
<description>I say both. He&amp;#039;s a liar AND a lousy Christian. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/23/nyts-charles-blow-mocks-romneys-magic-underwear/#IDComment300158065</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Sound Bite of the Day: Jake Tapper Challenges Jay Carney On &quot;Aggressive Journalism&quot;</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/02/22/sound-bite-of-the-day-jake-tapper-challenges-jay-carney-on-aggressive-journalism/#IDComment299529181</link>
<description>I wonder if Tapper will ask the lovely Ms. Mara about those looks she gave him. I mean, surely he&amp;#039;ll see this little display of her&amp;#039;s and they sort of work together. Love to see her explanation. Or more likely, Tapper could care less or is just used to that sort of behavior from her. Either way, such a classless act from a supposed &amp;quot;professional.&amp;quot; But I guess that&amp;#039;s par for course when talking about NPR. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 06:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/02/22/sound-bite-of-the-day-jake-tapper-challenges-jay-carney-on-aggressive-journalism/#IDComment299529181</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Sound Bite of the Day: Jake Tapper Challenges Jay Carney On &quot;Aggressive Journalism&quot;</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/02/22/sound-bite-of-the-day-jake-tapper-challenges-jay-carney-on-aggressive-journalism/#IDComment299523849</link>
<description>&amp;quot;The Face of NPR&amp;quot;  Congratulations Ms. Mara. You&amp;#039;ve managed to succinctly and perfectly characterize NPR&amp;#039;s intellectual-elitist snobbery in a couple of quick facial reactions. If they act this way to their fellow professionals, imagine what they must think of us average rubes out here in fly-over country. If NPR were ever to come clean about who they really are and where they are really coming from, they couldn&amp;#039;t come up with a better company logo than those no-nonsense letters &amp;quot;NPR&amp;quot; splashed across one of those Mara stills. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 06:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/02/22/sound-bite-of-the-day-jake-tapper-challenges-jay-carney-on-aggressive-journalism/#IDComment299523849</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>