<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/323856</link>
		<description>Comments by jic</description>
<item>
<title>Ladd Ehlinger Jr., Hyphenate : Star Trek Economics</title>
<link>http://FilmLadd.com/?StarTrekEconomics#IDComment337529534</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m sorry, but you&amp;#039;re completely and utterly wrong. Allow me to draw your attention to their first ever appearance, in the &lt;i&gt;TNG&lt;/i&gt; episode &lt;i&gt;The Last Outpost&lt;/i&gt;:   &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/www.st-minutiae.com\/academy\/literature329\/107.txt&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.st-minutiae.com/academy/literature329/...&lt;/a&gt;   From page 53:    &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;LETEK  (exhibiting the  Starfleet insignias  taken)  Proof of their barbarism -- they  adorn themselves with gold, a  despicable use of rare metal...&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/i&gt; Looks like they in fact valued gold very highly, doesn&amp;#039;t it? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://FilmLadd.com/?StarTrekEconomics#IDComment337529534</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : In Memoriam: Andrew Breitbart (1969-2012)</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lsolov/2012/03/01/draft/#IDComment306566133</link>
<description>I think Mary Jo Kopechne might know what that was about, but she&amp;#039;s unavailable for comment. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lsolov/2012/03/01/draft/#IDComment306566133</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : In Memoriam: Andrew Breitbart (1969-2012)</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lsolov/2012/03/01/draft/#IDComment305679274</link>
<description>Before I saw this I thought I was having a crappy day, but this puts that all into perspective.  I can&amp;#039;t believe that Andrew Breitbart is dead, and my deepest condolences go out to all his family and friends.  He will be greatly missed. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 19:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lsolov/2012/03/01/draft/#IDComment305679274</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : How &#039;Act of Valor&#039; Broke Through to the Mainstream</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/02/28/how-act-of-valor-broke-through-to-the-mainstream/#IDComment305357199</link>
<description>A $17M domestic gross on a $15M budget is a &amp;quot;commercial smash&amp;quot;?  They made another $32M internationally, so they may have made a small profit if they skimped on promotion, but we&amp;#039;re far from &amp;quot;smash&amp;quot; territory here. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 11:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/02/28/how-act-of-valor-broke-through-to-the-mainstream/#IDComment305357199</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : ‘Game of Thrones’ Review: Gripping and Unpredictable</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aprice/2012/02/29/game-of-thrones-review-gripping-and-unpredictable/#IDComment305327806</link>
<description>Except it&amp;#039;s a TV show. He&amp;#039;s survived TV shows before...   Having not read the book, it was a genuine surprise to me when they actually killed off Ned Stark. Up to that point, he was the closest thing the show had to a central character. Until the second they cut his head off, I thought he would be saved somehow. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 10:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aprice/2012/02/29/game-of-thrones-review-gripping-and-unpredictable/#IDComment305327806</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : ‘Game of Thrones’ Review: Gripping and Unpredictable</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aprice/2012/02/29/game-of-thrones-review-gripping-and-unpredictable/#IDComment305322503</link>
<description>Shame he was completely incapable of pronouncing Hereford, though.  Makes you wonder how many takes they went through before they gave up trying... </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 10:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aprice/2012/02/29/game-of-thrones-review-gripping-and-unpredictable/#IDComment305322503</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;One For the Money&#039; Review: Heigl&#039;s Grating Jersey Girl No Feminist Role Model</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lveneziani/2012/01/29/one-for-the-money-review-heigls-grating-jersey-girl-no-feminist-role-model/#IDComment278519961</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;I think you need to read the books to &amp;quot;get&amp;quot; the premise here.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/i&gt; If an adaptation of a book can&amp;#039;t be enjoyed or understood without reading the book first, then it fails as anything other than fan service. It&amp;#039;s the filmmakers&amp;#039; &lt;b&gt;job&lt;/b&gt; to get us to understand the characters and premise, and it sounds like they failed here. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lveneziani/2012/01/29/one-for-the-money-review-heigls-grating-jersey-girl-no-feminist-role-model/#IDComment278519961</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Heigl&#039;s Career Still Reeling from Foot in Mouth Disease</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/01/26/heigls-career-still-reeling-from-foot-in-mouth-disease-2/#IDComment275770508</link>
<description>Freedom of speech is not freedom from criticism or consequences.  Having said that, I  think that her choice of movies is what&amp;#039;s killing her career, not some stupid comments from several years ago. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/01/26/heigls-career-still-reeling-from-foot-in-mouth-disease-2/#IDComment275770508</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Heigl&#039;s Career Still Reeling from Foot in Mouth Disease</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/01/26/heigls-career-still-reeling-from-foot-in-mouth-disease-2/#IDComment275763404</link>
<description>Daniel Sunjata is in it, therefore I won&amp;#039;t see it.  It&amp;#039;s that simple. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/01/26/heigls-career-still-reeling-from-foot-in-mouth-disease-2/#IDComment275763404</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : The Five Worst Movies of 2011</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhanlon/2012/01/01/the-five-worst-movies-of-2011/#IDComment252763754</link>
<description>Nah, &lt;i&gt;Alien: Resurrection&lt;/i&gt; did that. &lt;i&gt;Alien 3&lt;/i&gt; was actually a pretty good movie, it just wasn&amp;#039;t what people wanted to see from the franchise: they expected huge Aliens vs Marines battles on an infested Earth, and got one Alien running through tunnels picking off guys at random. It felt like a step backwards. But anyway, the plot and setting weren&amp;#039;t Fincher&amp;#039;s decision.    &lt;i&gt;Fight Club&lt;/i&gt;, on the other hand was a boring, pretentious, stupid piece of crap. Its popularity has always mystified me. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Jan 2012 11:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhanlon/2012/01/01/the-five-worst-movies-of-2011/#IDComment252763754</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : The Worst Song of All Time: &#039;Imagine&#039;</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kschlichter/2009/10/27/the-worst-song-of-all-time-imagine/#IDComment252504288</link>
<description>He couldn&amp;#039;t have voted for Reagan even if he wanted to, he wasn&amp;#039;t a citizen. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Jan 2012 01:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kschlichter/2009/10/27/the-worst-song-of-all-time-imagine/#IDComment252504288</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Trailer Talk: &#039;Haywire&#039; - Hollywood&#039;s Newest Action Heroine?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2011/12/16/trailer-talk-haywire-hollywoods-newest-action-heroine/#IDComment240260887</link>
<description>Are you even reading my comments? I actually said three comments ago:          &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;If you really can&amp;#039;t find an actress who looks the part, forget about hand-to-hand combat altogether and just have her shoot everybody. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;      And, since you seem to have forgotten, you set the parameters with your first comment:          &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Martial arts training alone doesn&amp;#039;t make for a compelling action hero/heroine. You can&amp;#039;t turn an uncharismatic actress into a star, but you can teach a charismatic actress enough to make her look believable.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;     You were quite clearly talking about hand-to-hand combat, as you were when you said:        &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;By believable I meant that her moves look believable.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;   But apparently what you &lt;b&gt;really&lt;/b&gt; meant was &amp;#039;she manages to kill the bad guys in some way&amp;#039;.  OK, whatever. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 21:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2011/12/16/trailer-talk-haywire-hollywoods-newest-action-heroine/#IDComment240260887</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Trailer Talk: &#039;Haywire&#039; - Hollywood&#039;s Newest Action Heroine?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2011/12/16/trailer-talk-haywire-hollywoods-newest-action-heroine/#IDComment240155324</link>
<description>OK, how are you going to have an action movie with a heroine that can only fight small, weak adversaries?  What scenario could possibly work? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 17:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2011/12/16/trailer-talk-haywire-hollywoods-newest-action-heroine/#IDComment240155324</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Trailer Talk: &#039;Haywire&#039; - Hollywood&#039;s Newest Action Heroine?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2011/12/16/trailer-talk-haywire-hollywoods-newest-action-heroine/#IDComment240054284</link>
<description>We are both talking about action movies, aren&amp;#039;t we?  An action movie without big, strong badguys? Seriously?    Would you cast Michael Cera as James Bond?  No of course you wouldn&amp;#039;t. It&amp;#039;s the same if your action  hero is a woman, she has to look the part. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 14:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2011/12/16/trailer-talk-haywire-hollywoods-newest-action-heroine/#IDComment240054284</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Trailer Talk: &#039;Haywire&#039; - Hollywood&#039;s Newest Action Heroine?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2011/12/16/trailer-talk-haywire-hollywoods-newest-action-heroine/#IDComment240037810</link>
<description>No, but it&amp;#039;s necessary to have a heroine who looks like she could realistically beat a 300lb strongman.  Unless, that is, she&amp;#039;s supposed to be &amp;#039;magic&amp;#039; or have &amp;#039;superpowers&amp;#039;, in which case the whole thing is moot.  If you really can&amp;#039;t find an actress who looks the part, forget about hand-to-hand combat altogether and just have her shoot everybody. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 14:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2011/12/16/trailer-talk-haywire-hollywoods-newest-action-heroine/#IDComment240037810</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Trailer Talk: &#039;Haywire&#039; - Hollywood&#039;s Newest Action Heroine?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2011/12/16/trailer-talk-haywire-hollywoods-newest-action-heroine/#IDComment240005723</link>
<description>If the actress doesn&amp;#039;t look believable in the role, it isn&amp;#039;t really anything that scripting or fight choreography can fix.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 12:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2011/12/16/trailer-talk-haywire-hollywoods-newest-action-heroine/#IDComment240005723</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Trailer Talk: &#039;Haywire&#039; - Hollywood&#039;s Newest Action Heroine?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2011/12/16/trailer-talk-haywire-hollywoods-newest-action-heroine/#IDComment239980820</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;I also like to be perplexed and challenged by plot...and this one may do that.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/i&gt; Possibly, but there&amp;#039;s no sign of that in the trailer. Looks like Generic Action Movie Plot No. 5: &amp;#039;She was their best agent until they betrayed her, and now she&amp;#039;s out for blood... Theirs!&amp;#039; </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 12:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2011/12/16/trailer-talk-haywire-hollywoods-newest-action-heroine/#IDComment239980820</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Trailer Talk: &#039;Haywire&#039; - Hollywood&#039;s Newest Action Heroine?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2011/12/16/trailer-talk-haywire-hollywoods-newest-action-heroine/#IDComment239973085</link>
<description>Except that there are few &amp;quot;charismatic actresses&amp;quot; who make believable fighters.  If I&amp;#039;ve just seen a 90lb woman with forearms I could touch my thumb to my index finger around punch out a muscular 250lb man, that&amp;#039;s going to take me out of the movie somewhat. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 11:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2011/12/16/trailer-talk-haywire-hollywoods-newest-action-heroine/#IDComment239973085</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Trailer Talk: &#039;Haywire&#039; - Hollywood&#039;s Newest Action Heroine?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2011/12/16/trailer-talk-haywire-hollywoods-newest-action-heroine/#IDComment239593245</link>
<description> I imagine they&amp;#039;re in it because it&amp;#039;s a Steven Soderbergh movie.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 00:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2011/12/16/trailer-talk-haywire-hollywoods-newest-action-heroine/#IDComment239593245</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Trailer Talk: &#039;Haywire&#039; - Hollywood&#039;s Newest Action Heroine?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2011/12/16/trailer-talk-haywire-hollywoods-newest-action-heroine/#IDComment239537531</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s what I&amp;#039;ve been saying for years: if you are going to have a movie focused around a hot chick beating trained killers, choose a hot chick who looks like she could actually beat a trained killer. So, that part of the movie they nailed.  The rest of it - well, that trailer makes it look like a slightly above average DTV action movie that inexplicably attracted an A-list cast.  I&amp;#039;ll probably check it out on TV in a few years, or maybe buy the DVD if I find it cheap. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 23:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2011/12/16/trailer-talk-haywire-hollywoods-newest-action-heroine/#IDComment239537531</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>