Luis, you brought up some excellent points, ones that I agree with.

In the last 24 hours I have formulated a new reply to why Trump isn't dragging the RINO's out into the streets for us to go critical mass on.

He has a sense that the country, the Constitutional government is bigger than he is. True, Trump uses his 'bigger than life' persona when possible, but under that? He may want to wait and use the issue to pound the D's instead of attacking his own party. After all, he knows that the RINO's hate him more than they want to work 'for' the country.

Who does he think he is? Hillary Clinton?

If he's not a powerful "D" he's in trouble!

I see you still can't defend anything that you stand for.

Did you ever make up three reasons that you pretended to support Cruz?

While it's clear that atheism is more accepted, I wonder, what progress have atheists made to make it more 'inviting' or 'tolerant'? Is it just that religion is becoming more insulting or does atheism offer more than in the past?

There was a name involved in the Lewinsky affair you didn't mention. I friend Linda Tripp and another figure involved on the fringers, Lucianne Goldberg. When you read about their actions, the actions to stop the spin on Lewinsky gets more clear.

Lewinsky hates both of them, but without them acting on her behalf she'd be a late night joke and nothing more.

I was expecting a commentary from Luis on this. On how any time government rations the standard of living for the masses based on arbitrary standards, the masses grow unrestive.

Since you want to pretend you're the voice of reason, why don't you explain the top three reasons you support Ted Cruz?

I'll wait.

Still can't defend statism, or even explain why you're stupid enough to back a losing system that always fails?

That makes you the nutty one here. You aren't fooling anyone, you pretend to be cajun. Strange Sean spent time and was registered as a D in La. You mentioned being proud of what you had swinging between your legs once, so as a cross dresser from La you have one agenda. And as a failed propagandist you use Alinsky tactics. Why? You can't defend the core ideas that fail every time their imposed.

You are a loser, and all the slang and chatter doesn't change that.

You can't show I'm actually wrong.
You can't show where government control meant more food, more housing, better cars or medicine.

Yet you aren't smart enough to stop and think.... "I want housing, I want lots of food, I like shoes and if goverment took over the shoe industry shortages would hit within a week. I better think this through and figure out which system can get me more food and housing, and better doctors!"

You showed up because you're stupid enough to back a statist agenda, even knowing it always ends badly every time it's imposed. You can't defend it since it always fails but you can't shut up. So, you follow alinksy tactics since you can't actually debate any serious issue.

You don't care that your ideology has murdered millions, that makes you worse than a pig. It makes you a useful idiot.