en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/316306 Comments by jdlewallen http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9J6U8700&show_article=1#IDComment107079740 Then they missed a great game -- and was great to see the Rangers play their kind of ball instead of letting the San Fran-sissco giants win!! :-) Sun, 31 Oct 2010 22:56:07 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9J6U8700&show_article=1#IDComment107079740 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.c7bcd94def4a124acf37f2ecca4bd572.c21&show_article=1#IDComment95145160 Repeal of DADT will lead to an increase in "combat deaths" as fratricides dramatically increase... Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:18:27 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.c7bcd94def4a124acf37f2ecca4bd572.c21&show_article=1#IDComment95145160 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGL7R06&show_article=1#IDComment82070390 The greatest part of that "tragedy" is that obama and his ilk have worked to WORSEN this situation in order to capitalize on a crisis. He arrogantly refused to waive union protectionist measures and turned away help from several nations who have the ships and crews to contain the mess early on. He has repeatedly interfered with local authorities' attempts to contain the damage, and has allowed bureaucratic red tape to interfere while he goes golfing. He has done nothing to help and everything to interfere, as if he WANTS the oil on-shore so he can have a photo op and pontificate on how bad oil companies are as he pushes forward his crappy Cap-and-Tax bill. Obama has made this whole disaster escalate and worsen. HE deserves much more of the blame than ANY corporation, despite his party's attempts to paint anyone who actually earns the money that they like to spend as the bad guys. Fri, 25 Jun 2010 04:04:26 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGL7R06&show_article=1#IDComment82070390 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGL7R06&show_article=1#IDComment82068302 Good Lord, it's amazing how someone so completely stupid can be so arrogant. Pontificating? Bet you needed the online thesaurus for that one....and the irony of your using such a term is amusing. First of all, as I said before, there is a difference between filing an appeal and just ignoring the judge and issuing a new moratorium (as this idiot is wanting to do, despite the judge making it very clear he has no leg to stand on). Your idiocy is also showing in your BOLD FACE LIE about the judge. Do your damn homework before libeling a federal judge. The judge divested all such assets from his portfolio over TWO YEARS AGO. Furthermore, they have a computer system that checks such things to ensure judges don't preside over cases where they have any such interest involved, and Judge Feldman was found to have no conflict of interest in the matter, and, in fact, has been considered the very paragon of fairness in his 30 years on the bench. So, doesn't "THAT little point of law bother you", that you LIED about a federal judge? "Or are YOU so determined" to destroy a virtuous judge and the entire Gulf Coast economy based on a stupid decision based on faulty judgement by a zealous environmental whacko who not only ignored the findings of his expert consultants but also LIED about them recommending the idea, "no matter what the law says"?? Hmm?? "Stupid self, indeed. Go look in a mirror so you can see the very definition of "stupid self". So why don't you just STFU and go away, you worthless lying troll. Fri, 25 Jun 2010 03:58:23 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGL7R06&show_article=1#IDComment82068302 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGL7R06&show_article=1#IDComment81832984 YES, I am quite aware of what an appeal is. Do YOU not grasp the difference between "filing an appeal" and "issuing a new moratorium after being over-ridden AND castigated by a federal judge who also issued an INJUNCTION AGAINST further action"??? Two, totally different things. SO maybe YOU should learn something before spouting off YOUR jackass moron self... Thu, 24 Jun 2010 02:36:30 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGL7R06&show_article=1#IDComment81832984 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGL7R06&show_article=1#IDComment81832432 Even better -- Obama gave BP a SAFETY AWARD prior to the explosion!! Thu, 24 Jun 2010 02:33:55 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGL7R06&show_article=1#IDComment81832432 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGL7R06&show_article=1#IDComment81523886 What an arrogant jackass. Does the moron not understand what an "INJUNCTION" is?? This administration is beyond out of control and is totally trashing the rule of law. Obama seems to think himself a damned emperor instead of president. He doesn't seem to get that we don't give a crap about his whims. Wed, 23 Jun 2010 01:38:07 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGL7R06&show_article=1#IDComment81523886 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.fbcf8186298b2e778498b791229a7397.351&show_article=1#IDComment81515284 I love how you use every kind of BS argument to totally miss the point. "Subjugation" involves making someone do something against their will. Our women are allowed to CHOOSE what type of life they wish to lead. It's a relatively simple concept called FREEDOM that you camel jockeys don't seem to grasp. NO, not all familes are divorced, though there are more than there should be, but again, it comes from FREEDOM, which is better than being forced to stay with a depraved brute who beats a woman. And a society that denies half its population the right to free will ( a GOD GIVEN RIGHT) is the worst kind of "rotted filthy society". So you can take your arrogant attitude and shove it back up your ass, because it IS THE BUSINESS of EVERY DECENT HUMAN BEING to speak up against sexist arrogant jackass morons who want to use religion as an excuse for their actions. "Your way" is WRONG. If a woman DOES NOT WANT to hide herself because some arrogant man doesn't like it, she shouldn't have to do so. Again, you conveniently IGNORE the fact that there are MANY WOMEN WHO DO NOT WISH TO BE TREATED IN SUCH A WAY, but are beaten and abused for not subjecting themselves to the whims of illiterate, backwards brutes who have no control over their own passions. YOUR "depraved rotted culture" that approves of such misogyny is far worse than ANYTHING in the USA. Wed, 23 Jun 2010 00:45:42 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.fbcf8186298b2e778498b791229a7397.351&show_article=1#IDComment81515284 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGG1G00&show_article=1#IDComment81475399 Mexico's is actually MORE draconian, REQUIRING every single law-enforcement agency to act on border security. If we treated Mexican nationals the way they treat ALL FOREIGN NATIONALS, they would really scream, only further illustrating their own hypocrisy. The Mexican government NEEDS illegal immigration to the USA to continue in order to act as a safety valve on malcontents and others who can't get a decent living wage under their corrupt administration. Without illegal immigration, Mexico would soon be embroiled in another civil war to overthrow their corrupt government. Tue, 22 Jun 2010 20:55:53 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGG1G00&show_article=1#IDComment81475399 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.fbcf8186298b2e778498b791229a7397.351&show_article=1#IDComment81473412 How rich. You pontificate on America's past sins to use as justification for wrongs being committed in the name of religion in the present? You also divert onto irrelevant tangents. At least Israel respects individual rights, even when many of those individuals are hell-bent on their destruction. Regardless, the debate over land ownership and the Israeli state are NOT the topic here. Instead, the point was the subjugation of women, done in the name of religion. And YES, IT IS SUBJUGATION when women who DO NOT AGREE WITH THE IDEA of burying themselves beneath layers of clothing to hide themselves so lustful, arrogant men supposedly tempted are BEATEN, fined, incarcerated and killed just for dressing like a NORMAL human being. If someone wants to honestly CHOOSE such backwards behavior, that is their choice. but when women who choose DIFFERENTLY face the above mistreatment, sometimes to the point of death, it is WRONG. Period. Tue, 22 Jun 2010 20:43:57 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.fbcf8186298b2e778498b791229a7397.351&show_article=1#IDComment81473412 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.fbcf8186298b2e778498b791229a7397.351&show_article=1#IDComment81421447 First, there is a huge difference between pornography and dumping a blanket on a woman's head and suffocating her and making her less than a second-class citizen. one can abhor the first without resorting to the second. To equivocate the two is patent falsehood. And to claim that it is just a Western problem is equally false, as it seems that many of these oppressive states have even MORE depravity and illicit behavior. They just try to suppress information and hide it. Indeed, I would say these Islamic states are WORSE than the West, since they tend to blame the women and let the men off scott free. Anyone who insists on this kind of crap are barbaric misogynists who need to learn to govern their own passions instead of using their own depravities to justify the subjugation of women. Just because a woman shows her face, arms, or even legs does not give anyone the right to accost her or to lust after her, nor should SHE be the one to have to hide because you are a lustful beast. Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:30:28 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.fbcf8186298b2e778498b791229a7397.351&show_article=1#IDComment81421447 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.fbcf8186298b2e778498b791229a7397.351&show_article=1#IDComment81410776 BS. Just the opposite. Apparently, Muslim men are all rutting pigs who can't contain themselves when even just seeing ANY part of a woman's flesh. But instead of restraining THEMSELVES, it is all the WOMAN'S fault and SHE must cover up. If you can't contain yourself, gouge out your eyeballs or cut off your ****, but don't expect the women to hide because you are a sexual deviant. Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:05:20 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.fbcf8186298b2e778498b791229a7397.351&show_article=1#IDComment81410776 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.fbcf8186298b2e778498b791229a7397.351&show_article=1#IDComment81410410 You know, you bring up a good point that is forgotten by most Westerners - Iran was a decently modern, secular nation until the Carter debacle with the Shah and the overthrow of that government by the predecessors of this current, illegitimate regime. Makes it that much sadder, and should be a warning to us all about the dangers and the nature of these extremists. Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:02:09 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.fbcf8186298b2e778498b791229a7397.351&show_article=1#IDComment81410410 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.fbcf8186298b2e778498b791229a7397.351&show_article=1#IDComment81410070 I think YOU are the one showing his ignorance of Christianity. Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:58:56 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.fbcf8186298b2e778498b791229a7397.351&show_article=1#IDComment81410070 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.fbcf8186298b2e778498b791229a7397.351&show_article=1#IDComment81409812 Yeah, because the UN has been SOOOO helpful for them so far! The UN is about as useless as a French army... Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:56:43 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.fbcf8186298b2e778498b791229a7397.351&show_article=1#IDComment81409812 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.fbcf8186298b2e778498b791229a7397.351&show_article=1#IDComment81409688 That's nice that they finally do have something buried on their website, but I would prefer that they actually oppose this real oppression with the same fervor that they defend the "rights" of Western women to murder their children up to the point of birth. But somehow they seem to think that is worthy of defending to the death against ANY of the slightest encroachment, yet are pretty much SILENT when it comes to the oppression of women by Islamic governments/individuals. Where are the public protests, the "talking heads" condemning these actions VOCALLY and publicly? Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:55:41 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.fbcf8186298b2e778498b791229a7397.351&show_article=1#IDComment81409688 http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/04/23/friday-free-for-all-shakespeare-edition/#IDComment69954290 "Better a witty fool, than a foolish wit!" Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:06:18 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/04/23/friday-free-for-all-shakespeare-edition/#IDComment69954290 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2010/04/05/interview-letters-to-god-director-david-nixon/#IDComment66161695 Looks like a great film, but as the parent of an incurably-ill child myself, I don't think I would make it through it... Tue, 6 Apr 2010 04:39:54 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2010/04/05/interview-letters-to-god-director-david-nixon/#IDComment66161695 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.3bb1888ef1a1aa64be3cb69f704ec08b.da1&show_article=1#IDComment54253575 So will the deluxe version be the "Maxi" ? ;-) Will they have a "mini" for the low work flow days? Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:05:28 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.3bb1888ef1a1aa64be3cb69f704ec08b.da1&show_article=1#IDComment54253575 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CB8ESO0#IDComment45559631 Rufus, did you fail Reading 101? His comment was about how Tiger is standing up and admitting his mistakes and failures and is attempting to salvage his relationship. He didn't do the Bill Clinton denial or dodge, nor did he do the full-blown public crying over his errors. Wed, 2 Dec 2009 17:20:06 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CB8ESO0#IDComment45559631