<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/409280</link>
		<description>Comments by jbrotherlove</description>
<item>
<title>

        
    On a path
        

     : 

    This Love Affair - On a path

    </title>
<link>http://www.michellejones.net/onapath/2009/12/this-love-affair.php#IDComment48096941</link>
<description>Yay! This ounds like fun, Michelle. I&amp;#039;m excited that my friends are returning to (some form of) blogging. I&amp;#039;ve been going through my music of the year and trying to decide how I want to share. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.michellejones.net/onapath/2009/12/this-love-affair.php#IDComment48096941</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Brightkite Blog : &quot;The only good bug is a dead bug.&quot;</title>
<link>http://blog.brightkite.com/2009/10/06/the-only-good-bug-is-a-dead-bug/#IDComment37791526</link>
<description>sad panda is sadder without Brightkite : ( </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Oct 2009 06:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.brightkite.com/2009/10/06/the-only-good-bug-is-a-dead-bug/#IDComment37791526</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Tiffany B. Brown : Twitter, privacy, and informational self-determination</title>
<link>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2009/03/23/twitter-privacy-and-informational-self-determination/#IDComment17715892</link>
<description>We get it, Jason. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2009/03/23/twitter-privacy-and-informational-self-determination/#IDComment17715892</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Tiffany B. Brown : Twitter, privacy, and informational self-determination</title>
<link>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2009/03/23/twitter-privacy-and-informational-self-determination/#IDComment17516569</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;d agree, there are no official online rules. And considering the medium, it&amp;#039;s too late to create them and expect adherence. It boils down to a user&amp;#039;s interpretation and respect of what &amp;quot;privacy&amp;quot; means on each service. This is why the &amp;quot;ask permission&amp;quot; aspect of following a protected Twitter account breaks down.   I can rant about how unfair this is until I&amp;#039;m blue in the face. But it doesn&amp;#039;t stop the person next to me from repeating, remixing and reinterpreting what I said or did.  People use &amp;quot;private&amp;quot; and copyrighted Flickr photos all the time. And the number of Facebook horror stories seems to grow daily (due to, perhaps, a sense of privacy many feel when using that service).   We are rapidly approaching a point where if you don&amp;#039;t want something reproduced, you shouldn&amp;#039;t produce it.  And this isn&amp;#039;t only relegated to online activity. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2009/03/23/twitter-privacy-and-informational-self-determination/#IDComment17516569</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Tiffany B. Brown : Twitter, privacy, and informational self-determination</title>
<link>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2009/03/23/twitter-privacy-and-informational-self-determination/#IDComment17511442</link>
<description>The explosion of social media communication is keeping technology on its toes with regards to privacy. Like you Tiffany, my biggest reason for having a protected Twitter account is Google. And frankly, I wish all social networks would block search bots from crawling member information. Or at least give users the option not to have their info crawled.  Vicki&amp;#039;s confusion over private accounts is one I hear often. But a blog and Twitter are not the same tool. It makes perfect sense to me that a different tool has different uses.  &lt;strong&gt;@misterjt&lt;/strong&gt; Your last paragraph contains the magic question. It&amp;#039;s not so different a struggle that artists of every genre are having with their work. And while I wouldn&amp;#039;t equate any of my &amp;quot;tweets&amp;quot; as art, they are content I create. Is it not reasonable to think I &amp;quot;own&amp;quot; them in some respect? Where is the line of &amp;quot;fair use&amp;quot; and who decides?  I often post screenshots of my favorite tweets and I always obscure the usernames of those who are private. But is that enough? Should I not post them at all? I&amp;#039;m pretty sure I&amp;#039;m not as diligent with retweets. It&amp;#039;s a head scratcher for sure. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2009/03/23/twitter-privacy-and-informational-self-determination/#IDComment17511442</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>