<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/554929</link>
		<description>Comments by andrew potter</description>
<item>
<title>Macleans.ca : On macho posturing</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/31/on-macho-posturing/#IDComment139013522</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m 80 pages in, it&amp;#039;s very good so far. Fick, you may recall, is the  Lt in Generation Kill. He&amp;#039;s now the CEO of the Centre for a new American Security.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Apr 2011 04:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/31/on-macho-posturing/#IDComment139013522</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Busting silos and transgressing the boundaries: A call for submissions</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/16/busting-silos-and-transgressing-the-boundaries-a-call-for-submissions/#IDComment116455322</link>
<description>This is pretty much exactly where I&amp;#039;m coming from. Academia is the ground zero for a lot of this stuff, because it is the one place where theories of power/knowledge are most easily translated into organizational practice. So what I&amp;#039;m interested in looking at is how the arcane academic theories of disciplinarity that you mention have been translated into corporate theories of needing to &amp;quot;bust silos&amp;quot; in the name of innovation and creativity.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/16/busting-silos-and-transgressing-the-boundaries-a-call-for-submissions/#IDComment116455322</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Busting silos and transgressing the boundaries: A call for submissions</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/16/busting-silos-and-transgressing-the-boundaries-a-call-for-submissions/#IDComment116431202</link>
<description>That&amp;#039;s interesting -- thanks a lot.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/16/busting-silos-and-transgressing-the-boundaries-a-call-for-submissions/#IDComment116431202</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Busting silos and transgressing the boundaries: A call for submissions</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/16/busting-silos-and-transgressing-the-boundaries-a-call-for-submissions/#IDComment116430519</link>
<description>This is kinda why I&amp;#039;m interested in the subject.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/16/busting-silos-and-transgressing-the-boundaries-a-call-for-submissions/#IDComment116430519</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Busting silos and transgressing the boundaries: A call for submissions</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/16/busting-silos-and-transgressing-the-boundaries-a-call-for-submissions/#IDComment116430332</link>
<description>That&amp;#039;s not remotely what I was asking.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/16/busting-silos-and-transgressing-the-boundaries-a-call-for-submissions/#IDComment116430332</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : In Afghanistan, all roads lead to Pakistan</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/16/in-afghanistan-all-roads-lead-to-pakistan/#IDComment116233550</link>
<description>Nice, thanks. His last point, too, about Afghanistan and Pakistan, is right I think:  &amp;quot;so we are destabilizing Pakistan, a country which does actually matter in terms of international security, out of some twisted perverse idea that Afghanistan matters and is somehow a threat.&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/16/in-afghanistan-all-roads-lead-to-pakistan/#IDComment116233550</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : In Afghanistan, all roads lead to Pakistan</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/16/in-afghanistan-all-roads-lead-to-pakistan/#IDComment116233025</link>
<description>You got any links?  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/16/in-afghanistan-all-roads-lead-to-pakistan/#IDComment116233025</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : In Afghanistan, all roads lead to Pakistan</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/16/in-afghanistan-all-roads-lead-to-pakistan/#IDComment116220853</link>
<description>Really? By who? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/16/in-afghanistan-all-roads-lead-to-pakistan/#IDComment116220853</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Winter Management</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/14/winter-management/#IDComment115776318</link>
<description>I always loved that line.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/14/winter-management/#IDComment115776318</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : And suddenly Ottawa disappears up its own rear-end</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/09/ottawa-disappears-up-its-own-rear-end/#IDComment114736380</link>
<description>I thought he was referencing that old classic Aislin cartoon.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Dec 2010 18:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/09/ottawa-disappears-up-its-own-rear-end/#IDComment114736380</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Afghanistan: The leak isn&#039;t the story</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/02/afghanistan-the-leak-isnt-the-story/#IDComment113481537</link>
<description>useful comment, as always.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Dec 2010 05:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/02/afghanistan-the-leak-isnt-the-story/#IDComment113481537</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Who wears the big boy pants?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/02/who-wears-the-big-boy-pants/#IDComment107392225</link>
<description>I think Canada is being Punk&amp;#039;d.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Nov 2010 17:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/02/who-wears-the-big-boy-pants/#IDComment107392225</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Chequebook journalism and covering the trapped miners</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/01/chequebook-journalism-and-covering-the-trapped-miners/#IDComment107184964</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s a good question Petrou asks. It&amp;#039;s an old question for journalism, but one that has been given new life in part because of Gawker media&amp;#039;s unabashedness about engaging in chequebook journalism. Nick Denton has made it clear he has no problem with it, and it will be interesting to see the extent to which &amp;quot;mainstream&amp;quot; media will follow along. If so, it&amp;#039;s yet another way in which Denton is setting the terms of engagememt for all media now.    &lt;a href=&quot;http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20091019/does-checkbook-blogging-pay-off-hard-to-measure-says-gawker-medias-nick-denton/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20091019/does-che...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/01/chequebook-journalism-and-covering-the-trapped-miners/#IDComment107184964</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Planet Mad Men</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/13/planet-mad-men/#IDComment98703049</link>
<description>Maybe I&amp;#039;ll give it a look. I&amp;#039;ve been looking for something else to watch, and I have no interest in Lost. Breaking Bad had me for the first season but I let it drop and never really got back into it.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/13/planet-mad-men/#IDComment98703049</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Planet Mad Men</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/13/planet-mad-men/#IDComment98592872</link>
<description>I never got into either show. I think I saw three episodes of both those series&amp;#039; combined.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/13/planet-mad-men/#IDComment98592872</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The case of the Chilean miners</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/03/the-case-of-the-chilean-miners/#IDComment96775771</link>
<description>I always liked this one:  &amp;quot;My brother Foster&amp;#039;s penchant for finding holes in statutes reminds one of the story told by an ancient author about the man who ate a pair of shoes. Asked how he liked them, he replied that the part he liked best was the holes. That is the way my brother feels about statutes; the more holes they have in them the better he likes them. In short, he doesn&amp;#039;t like statutes.&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Sep 2010 16:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/03/the-case-of-the-chilean-miners/#IDComment96775771</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Great split-seconds in rock history</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/31/great-split-seconds-in-rock-history/#IDComment96166107</link>
<description>The last four bars of Richie Sambora&amp;#039;s solo in Wanted Dead or Alive. Screaming harmonics FTW. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/31/great-split-seconds-in-rock-history/#IDComment96166107</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Great split-seconds in rock history</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/31/great-split-seconds-in-rock-history/#IDComment96156986</link>
<description>Worst split second in rock: Robert Plant squealing &amp;quot;Does anyone remember laughter?&amp;quot; during Stairway, in the live version on Song Remains the Same.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/31/great-split-seconds-in-rock-history/#IDComment96156986</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Great split-seconds in rock history</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/31/great-split-seconds-in-rock-history/#IDComment96155501</link>
<description>Roger Daltrey yelling, &amp;quot;They&amp;#039;re all WASTED&amp;quot; during Baba O&amp;#039;Reily.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/31/great-split-seconds-in-rock-history/#IDComment96155501</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : War: A love story</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/18/war-a-love-story/#IDComment94369336</link>
<description>Amazing.&amp;quot;I haven&amp;#039;t read the book, but I&amp;#039;m not going to believe it anyway.&amp;quot;  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/18/war-a-love-story/#IDComment94369336</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>