<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/681238</link>
		<description>Comments by jacker</description>
<item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : Michigan movements</title>
<link>http://gazetteonline.com/blogs/on-iowa/2009/10/08/michigan-movements#IDComment37900645</link>
<description>If I am Michigan, I spread out Iowa with 4-5 wide, go no-huddle and run the QB draw with Robinson at QB for about 10 plays straight (or until Iowa commits to stop it)...then bring in Forcier. Iowa doesn&amp;#039;t sub the DL, and have had their difficulties in the past with mobile QBs in the spread. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Oct 2009 23:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://gazetteonline.com/blogs/on-iowa/2009/10/08/michigan-movements#IDComment37900645</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : The Big Analysis -- Michigan</title>
<link>http://gazetteonline.com/blogs/on-iowa/2009/10/07/the-big-analysis-michigan#IDComment37900091</link>
<description>My Analysis:   Dave Witvoet referee = Michigan win...I was there in 2005. I am honestly a little concerned for his safety due to the number of posts on the Hawkeye-focused websites (titles include &amp;quot;Witvoet Watch&amp;quot;). I hope the B-10 is smart about how they distribute crews this week. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Oct 2009 23:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://gazetteonline.com/blogs/on-iowa/2009/10/07/the-big-analysis-michigan#IDComment37900091</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>