en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1470181 Comments by impatient9 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88132905 So glad this now makes sense poor little stoned one. Actually I would imagine the Breitbart called Glenn Beck and said "You know how you've been calling Obama a white-hating racist? I have a tape of a speech a black woman from the Ag department gave to the NAACP and she says she hates white people in it." And Glenn and his people say "Holy Cr$p! Send it over!" And in order to make his deadline 8 hours away, the busy little Beck Bees call the Ag department for comment on this tape, and perhaps even read a transcript of that select part of the tape to the receptionist at the AG department.. And the AG department, terrified of a the right, and committed to wanting to be neutral and have everybody get along, fires Sherrod rather than have to defend those remarks. Yes, the White House should have known that anything originating from FOX or Glenn Beck isn't worth the paper necessary to wipe Rupert Murdoch's sizeable a$$, but Keith Olbermann's point was "Just how stupid are you guys in the Obama White House? Wasn't it fairly obvious that considering the source, it was going to be fake?" Get over the idea that you are going to change Washsington. These idits are toxic and nothing but healthy doses of their own vile medicine will ever get you anywhere. I especially loved it when he said, in exasperation, "This is WAR for god's sake". You guys have more gall and nerve than the entire left put together, but you're all stupid and uneducated. Sorry. But read these comments and argue otherwise. If i had the time, I'd tally them up. I'd leave it to one of you, one of the unwashed inbred microcephalic masses who like to come up with new non-sensical insults (maggot filled swamp leech was one of my favorites) for the left to do that, but I doubt you can count that high. Thu, 22 Jul 2010 23:22:06 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88132905 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88120082 I rest my case. Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:42:10 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88120082 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88119959 You're calling Keith's audience the less educated, less informed masses? What do you call this bunch? Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:41:43 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88119959 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88119780 See the problem here is that all you people know how to do is spill vitriol and call names. There are never any legitimate criticisms here that you can back up with facts. Just the name calling. It makes you all look so uneducated and lame. (I am allowed. I have done the research). Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:41:06 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88119780 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88119206 That would be Keith Olbermann. O.L.B.E.R.M.A.N.N. I bet Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity all know who he is. Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:38:59 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88119206 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88118866 I believe that would be "forth" Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:37:52 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88118866 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88118577 They made it known that she was going to be attacked as a racist on Glenn Beck 8 hours before his show aired. Which was enough time for all the mess to unfold, and for Glenn Beck to backtrack. Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:36:42 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88118577 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88118352 That's like saying a child pornographer is bothersome. Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:35:32 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88118352 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88118269 NO. Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:34:48 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88118269 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88118213 Do you know what rationalization means? It does not mean rational thought. It means attempting to justify unjustifiable positions. So ironically, yes, you are a man of rationalization. Thoughtful competence is wrong on so many levels. It is not possible for competence to be thoughtful. A person can be thoughtful and competent, but thoughtful cannot modify competence. I think what you meant to say is that you are a man who thinks deeply about things. But the fact is, you clearly do not. Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:34:28 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88118213 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88105822 I looked your postings up. Most of them consist of some variation on "move along." Do you have no ability to communicate your thoughts? Are you that limited in your speech? Do you think "Move along" carries any weight? It's a very bizarre thing to say over and over again. Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:05:18 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88105822 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88105555 Yes you can. Posting that edited video was clearly meant to be slanderous. "Defamation of character is the communication of false information stated as fact which brings harm to an individual or an entity, such as a business, group or government." Slander is the spoken word, libel the written word. I would say the fact that Breitbart is trying to cover his own a$$ by claiming he didn't actually edit the original tape, but that he rceived it already edited is an indication of just how worried the man really is. Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:03:31 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88105555 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88103732 That mad joker avatar, while suiting you perfectly, grows old so very fast. Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:51:27 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88103732 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88103645 I know. But I am thinking that if Shirley Sherrod sues him (and she says she will), it may be the last we hear of Breitbart. One can only hope. Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:50:49 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88103645 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88103146 I know. But there are several things I've noticed. These people do not thinkin independently. They come up with the ugliest drivel possible and then they post it so other weak minded people can chuckle and nudge and say "heh heh heh, good one." There's no thought here. I know Breitbart is an opportunist of the worst order, but somehow it seems there ought to be a law against pandering to this lowest element of society. Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:47:30 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88103146 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88102850 How does this even make any sense at all? Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:45:47 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88102850 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88102800 Interesting. So the poster congratulates Keith Olbermann on an eloquent and well spoken special comment, and you are making a generic racist rant, a la Hannity (see above). Do you have software that just spits this drivel out for you? Do you have to spend time thinking it up? Does it just flow naturally? It all sounds like a perfectly dreadful life you must be leading. Let me recommend going back to school. Couldn't hurt! Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:45:18 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88102800 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88102470 Nice Avatar. Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:43:13 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88102470 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88102404 Wow. Can the Klan spare you for posting on the internet? Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:42:53 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88102404 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88102261 Are you sure you want just one? 1. From PolitiFact.com He lied about the Cash For Clunkers Program. "Listen, all we've got to do is you got to go to a local junkyard — all you've got to do is tow (the car) to your house. And you're going to get $4,500," Hannity said. "I'm going to go do that." Actually, legislators anticipated just such a scheme and included provisions to prevent it. First, the law requires that the vehicle must be in "drivable condition." So if it needs to be towed to your house, no dice. And second, the trade-in has to have been "continuously insured consistent with the applicable state law and registered to the same owner for a period of not less than one year immediately prior to such trade-in." In English: You have to have owned the car for a year, and you have to be able to prove it. 2. He lied about What Colin Powell said during his visit to Iraq: HANNITY: "Colin Powell just had a great piece that he had in the paper today. He was there [in Iraq]. He said things couldn't have been better." (9/19/03) ACTUALLY: Here is what Colin Powell's piece said: "Iraq has come very far, but serious problems remain, starting with security. American commanders and troops told me of the many threats they face--from leftover loyalists who want to return Iraq to the dark days of Saddam, from criminals who were set loose on Iraqi society when Saddam emptied the jails and, increasingly, from outside terrorists who have come to Iraq to open a new front in their campaign against the civilized world." (Colin Powell, 9/19/03) 3. Hannity claimed Bush was in favor of investigating intelligence failures following 9/11 and that Liberals were against it. In fact, it was the other way around, and it was the widows of 9/11 who finally shamed Bush into forming the 9/11 Commission: HANNITY: "[After 9-11], liberal Democrats at first showed little interest in the investigation of the roots of this massive intelligence failure...[Bush and his team] made it clear that determining the causes of America's security failures and finding and remedying its weak points would be central to their mission." (Let Freedom Ring, by Sean Hannity) TRUTH: Bush Opposed the creation of a special commission to probe the causes of 9/11 for over a year. On 5/23/02 CBS News Reported "President Bush took a few minutes during his trip to Europe Thursday to voice his opposition to establishing a special commission to probe how the government dealt with terror warnings before Sept. 11." Bush didn't relent to pressure to create a commission, mostly from those Hannity would consider "liberal" until September 2002. (CBS News, 5/23/02) I totally love THIS one: HANNITY: "I never questioned anyone's patriotism." (9/18/03) Contradicting Quotations: HANNITY: (to attorney Stanley Cohen) "Is it you hate this president or that you hate America?" (4/30/03) Or how about this? The man is SUCH a braintrust, isn't he? HANNITY: "It doesn't say anywhere in the Constitution this idea of the separation of church and state." (8/25/03) 1. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." (1st Amendment) 2. "The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States." (Article VI) There are so many more, I'd be typing all day. Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:42:04 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88102261