<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/3694985</link>
		<description>Comments by imdumimdum</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Anchorwoman Freudian Slip </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/anchorwoman-freudian-slip/#IDComment283172802</link>
<description>so what was the email supposed to be anyway?  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 23:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/anchorwoman-freudian-slip/#IDComment283172802</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Heated Exchange Between Paul And Gingrich Over Military Service</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/heated-exchange-between-paul-and-gingrich-over-military-service/#IDComment258691501</link>
<description>i never understood what the hard on was aussies have for the united states.  they&amp;#039;ll read a few ariticles, watch a few movies, then feel qualified to lecture americans on our political system.  believe me oz is no brain trust.  just an island with funny animals nice whether and funny accents.  that being said, you&amp;#039;re dead on wrt to newt gingrich.  don&amp;#039;t  bloat aussie don, i think you just got lucky with ur analysis this time. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jan 2012 17:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/heated-exchange-between-paul-and-gingrich-over-military-service/#IDComment258691501</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama&#039;s EPA Opens Another Front in the War on Coal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment257939932</link>
<description>we are carbon based life forms but don&amp;#039;t breathe carbon, so a silicon based life form wouldn&amp;#039;t necessarily breath silicon, the could breathe oxygen. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 7 Jan 2012 21:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment257939932</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama&#039;s EPA Opens Another Front in the War on Coal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment256253477</link>
<description>yes but to an environmentalist it wouldn&amp;#039;t ameliorate the CO2 emissions. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jan 2012 22:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment256253477</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama&#039;s EPA Opens Another Front in the War on Coal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment256193764</link>
<description>i guess i misread your post, but h2s doesn&amp;#039;t exist terribly long in the atmosphere.  it oxidizes very quickly. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jan 2012 20:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment256193764</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama&#039;s EPA Opens Another Front in the War on Coal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment256175998</link>
<description>not to mention the ch4 trapped in the oceans.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jan 2012 20:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment256175998</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Casey Anthony Starts Video Blog, Fails To Mention Caylee</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/casey-anthony-starts-video-blog-fails-to-mention-caylee/#IDComment256165002</link>
<description>i hope the jurors watch this and remind themselves they let a murderer go free. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jan 2012 19:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/casey-anthony-starts-video-blog-fails-to-mention-caylee/#IDComment256165002</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama&#039;s EPA Opens Another Front in the War on Coal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment256160423</link>
<description>what do you mean HS?  hydrogen sulfide? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jan 2012 19:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment256160423</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama&#039;s EPA Opens Another Front in the War on Coal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment256115368</link>
<description>you don&amp;#039;t understand basic chemistry, burning coal completely will produce CO2 and water, so clean burning coal means no particulates and heavy metals like Hg and U, it does not ean no CO2. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jan 2012 18:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment256115368</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama&#039;s EPA Opens Another Front in the War on Coal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment256107739</link>
<description>mammals could have existed during the carboniferous had they evolved by that time.  could humans have survived?  im not sure, O2 levels were around 35%, which i think is approaching toxic levels for humans.  but O2 levels would be the limiting factor; even though CO2 levels were around 5-7x what they are today, they still were orders of magnitude below toxic levels.     </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jan 2012 18:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment256107739</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama&#039;s EPA Opens Another Front in the War on Coal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment256102033</link>
<description>i agree.  and plants aren&amp;#039;t necessarily limited by CO2. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jan 2012 18:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment256102033</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama&#039;s EPA Opens Another Front in the War on Coal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment256060522</link>
<description>it&amp;#039;s amazing how much cleaner it&amp;#039;s gotten.  mercury levels have dropped dramatically in the adriondacks. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment256060522</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama&#039;s EPA Opens Another Front in the War on Coal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment256058982</link>
<description>well we do need carbon to survive. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment256058982</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama&#039;s EPA Opens Another Front in the War on Coal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment256035872</link>
<description>thats right, it is more toxic and dangerous too.  and it doesn&amp;#039;t kill all biological life, while it may be toxic for some, it&amp;#039;s merely a molecule and product of respiration for some and a carbon source for others.   </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jan 2012 16:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment256035872</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama&#039;s EPA Opens Another Front in the War on Coal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment256002256</link>
<description>5-7% should read 5-7x. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jan 2012 15:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment256002256</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama&#039;s EPA Opens Another Front in the War on Coal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment255995066</link>
<description>google lake nyos, or just take my word for it, on forums like this i don&amp;#039;t trust links nor do i post them.  even during the carboniferous co2 levels were no where near toxic levels, at the beginning of the carboniferous during the mississpian co2 levels being 10x what they are today is pushing it a little most estimates im aware of around 5-7%, but but the middle, around the start of the mississippian they decreased to about what they are today; but i digress.   co2 is toxic at around 7% per volume.  co2 poisoning is rare, but it does occur as like it did at lake nyos.  and by toxic i mean toxic.  you don&amp;#039;t suffocate like you would with argon, which would displace the oxygen.    </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jan 2012 15:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2012/01/04/obamas-epa-opens-another-front-in-the-war-on-coal/#IDComment255995066</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Ron Paul Calls Gingrich &#039;Chicken Hawk,&#039; Attacks Vietnam Deferment</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/ron-paul-calls-gingrich-chicken-hawk-attacks-vietnam-deferment/#IDComment255558539</link>
<description>or maybe that was because i wasn&amp;#039;t in the marines or army.   </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jan 2012 03:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/ron-paul-calls-gingrich-chicken-hawk-attacks-vietnam-deferment/#IDComment255558539</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Ron Paul Calls Gingrich &#039;Chicken Hawk,&#039; Attacks Vietnam Deferment</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/ron-paul-calls-gingrich-chicken-hawk-attacks-vietnam-deferment/#IDComment255549758</link>
<description>actually a POG (haven&amp;#039;t heard that term in a while!) is still a hell of a lot more qualified to talk about the military than deferment pussies like gingrich, limbaugh, cheney...  i think hannity was too young for any kind of conscription. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jan 2012 03:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/ron-paul-calls-gingrich-chicken-hawk-attacks-vietnam-deferment/#IDComment255549758</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Ron Paul Calls Gingrich &#039;Chicken Hawk,&#039; Attacks Vietnam Deferment</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/ron-paul-calls-gingrich-chicken-hawk-attacks-vietnam-deferment/#IDComment255544443</link>
<description>didn&amp;#039;t have an MOS, dude. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jan 2012 03:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/ron-paul-calls-gingrich-chicken-hawk-attacks-vietnam-deferment/#IDComment255544443</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Ron Paul Calls Gingrich &#039;Chicken Hawk,&#039; Attacks Vietnam Deferment</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/ron-paul-calls-gingrich-chicken-hawk-attacks-vietnam-deferment/#IDComment255542057</link>
<description>that would be sean hannity ur referring to! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jan 2012 03:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/ron-paul-calls-gingrich-chicken-hawk-attacks-vietnam-deferment/#IDComment255542057</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>