<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/547274</link>
		<description>Comments by idealist</description>
<item>
<title>http://thebritishresistanc.co.uk/ : Free Emma West. Vigil outside HMP Bronzefield 2nd December</title>
<link>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/the-editor/1438-free-emma-west-vigil-outside-hmp-bronzefield-2nd-december#IDComment231019290</link>
<description>How can anyone say England is not a Police state? That said, she probably would have evaded arrest if the video clip hadn&amp;#039;t gone viral on the Internet. This country is really sad. It hates itself to a degree that I haven&amp;#039;t seen elsewhere in the world, and our people are riddled with traitors from top to bottom.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Dec 2011 13:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/the-editor/1438-free-emma-west-vigil-outside-hmp-bronzefield-2nd-december#IDComment231019290</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://thebritishresistanc.co.uk/ : Emma West and the Race Traitor Gavin Barwell MP</title>
<link>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/the-editor/1433-emma-west-and-the-race-traitor-gavin-barwell-mp#IDComment230443590</link>
<description>This man reminds me of Nick Clegg, who recently said that  &amp;#039;racism should be met with a steel fist&amp;#039;. By that he doesn&amp;#039;t mean racism against whites. He more or less espouses the idea of an anti-white tyranny. Clegg cares about as much as his own people as the Croydon Central MP above. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 20:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/the-editor/1433-emma-west-and-the-race-traitor-gavin-barwell-mp#IDComment230443590</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://thebritishresistanc.co.uk/ : Emma West. Truth or Racial Harassment?</title>
<link>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/the-editor/1432-emma-west-truth-or-racial-harassment#IDComment230439348</link>
<description>Normal person, you are only &amp;#039;normal&amp;#039; in the sense that like so many English people, you don&amp;#039;t care about your own bretheren. Although Emma Wests rant was crude and inarticulate, it doesn&amp;#039;t change the fact that she is unhappy about being outnumbered by ethnic &amp;#039;minorities&amp;#039; in her own country. Remember Croydon wasn&amp;#039;t always the way it is now, and it was major focal point during the summer riots. Sometimes peoples emotions can just flare up spontaneously when they feel desperate and that nobody cares about their welfare or the future of the country. London will soon be majority non-white, is that something to celebrate? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 20:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/the-editor/1432-emma-west-truth-or-racial-harassment#IDComment230439348</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://thebritishresistanc.co.uk/ : Panorama and the BNP</title>
<link>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/the-editor/1313-panorama-and-the-bnp#IDComment206120090</link>
<description>What Griffin said about the KKK i.e. that David Duke was in a non-violent chapter of it was essentially true, but he didn&amp;#039;t go on to say that it was a youthful transgression of Duke which he has since put behind him. In short Griffin bungled his response to become a figure of fun, but to be fair with a hostile impatient audience rigged to be against any form of British patriotism, he was in the lions den. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 19:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/the-editor/1313-panorama-and-the-bnp#IDComment206120090</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : “Budget Cuts”: Immigration Control Staff in Dover to be Sacked</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/05/budget-cuts-immigration-control-staff-in-dover-to-be-sacked/#IDComment71686858</link>
<description>You couldn&amp;#039;t make this stuff up. I think I understand Brownies much vaunted points system now. You get awarded a point if you&amp;#039;re an illegal immigrant! </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 May 2010 17:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/05/budget-cuts-immigration-control-staff-in-dover-to-be-sacked/#IDComment71686858</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : Old-Gang Parties “All Ignore the Immigration Issue” Says Nick Griffin</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/old-gang-parties-all-ignore-the-immigration-issue-says-nick-griffin/#IDComment71515666</link>
<description>I try to avoid discussions in the workplace on this issue because if the ensuing debate gets too heated then it can interfere with other aspects of your working relationship. But your colleauge doesn&amp;#039;t sound too bright from his overreaction and has demonstrated he can&amp;#039;t have a mature rational discussion with you. I think politics should be avoided in the workplace, but if anyone insists it&amp;#039;s ok to talk politics in their office then it shouldn&amp;#039;t be up to leftists to decide what can be said. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/old-gang-parties-all-ignore-the-immigration-issue-says-nick-griffin/#IDComment71515666</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : Nick Griffin Speaks to CNN</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/nick-griffin-speaks-to-cnn/#IDComment71339153</link>
<description>The interview was ok but the CNN lady asked &amp;#039;are you a racist party&amp;#039; at least twice. Can there be a day when the media refrain from using that obligatory question, or at least pose it in a more appropriate manner such as &amp;#039;what is your policy on non-indigenous Britons?&amp;#039; </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/nick-griffin-speaks-to-cnn/#IDComment71339153</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : “Bigot” Gaffe: BNP to Launch Advertising Campaign to Focus Voters’ Attention on Contempt with </title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/%e2%80%9cold-bigot%e2%80%9d-gaffe-bnp-to-launch-advertising-campaign-to-focus-voters%e2%80%99-attention-on-contempt-with-which-the-establishment-holds-the-public/#IDComment71243353</link>
<description>Lionheart, those countries you listed are also losing their identity fast and the United States is not part of the Commonwealth. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/%e2%80%9cold-bigot%e2%80%9d-gaffe-bnp-to-launch-advertising-campaign-to-focus-voters%e2%80%99-attention-on-contempt-with-which-the-establishment-holds-the-public/#IDComment71243353</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : “Bigot” Gaffe: BNP to Launch Advertising Campaign to Focus Voters’ Attention on Contempt with </title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/%e2%80%9cold-bigot%e2%80%9d-gaffe-bnp-to-launch-advertising-campaign-to-focus-voters%e2%80%99-attention-on-contempt-with-which-the-establishment-holds-the-public/#IDComment71178751</link>
<description>I would hope she doesn&amp;#039;t sue him as that only panders to the paranoid PC culture the BNP is opposed to, where the slightest offensive verbal remark is worthy of exploitation. It was just rude of Brown to say that, and by revealing his contempt for the ordinary public he scored a huge own goal. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/%e2%80%9cold-bigot%e2%80%9d-gaffe-bnp-to-launch-advertising-campaign-to-focus-voters%e2%80%99-attention-on-contempt-with-which-the-establishment-holds-the-public/#IDComment71178751</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : Marmite Smear Fails after BNP’s Spoof Election Broadcast</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/marmite-smear-fails-after-bnps-spoof-election-broadcast/#IDComment69779533</link>
<description>Once again the BNP sets the record straight. At first I couldn&amp;#039;t understand why the party would take an unnecessary risk by placing a Marmite jar on it&amp;#039;s pre-election broadcast, but it seems it was done unofficially by a joker. While I don&amp;#039;t think any supporter of the party should play such pranks during an election campaign, I think Unilever have some nerve to threaten the BNP for an internet video when they have already released a hostile politicised TV advert. Just as well I don&amp;#039;t like Marmite. Mind you, I wonder if Marmite will see a boost in sales from this affair?  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/marmite-smear-fails-after-bnps-spoof-election-broadcast/#IDComment69779533</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : Labour/Tory UAF Storm Troopers Attack Election Hustings</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/labourtory-uaf-storm-troopers-attack-election-hustings/#IDComment69032880</link>
<description>I believe the UAF is closely allied with the SWP (Socialist Workers Party), an offshoot I think. Read a Wikipedia entry on SWP for more info.   </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/labourtory-uaf-storm-troopers-attack-election-hustings/#IDComment69032880</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : Labour/Tory UAF Storm Troopers Attack Election Hustings</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/labourtory-uaf-storm-troopers-attack-election-hustings/#IDComment69025485</link>
<description>Sorry I disagree, I don&amp;#039;t think enough people know that the UAF are backed by prominent politicians. And believe it or not, there&amp;#039;s even those who don&amp;#039;t know who the UAF is. It&amp;#039;s worth telling LibLabCon voters about them wherever possible in political discussions. I told a relative of mine on Sunday that Cameron is a signatory to the UAF, though they&amp;#039;re not a fan of him anyway. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/labourtory-uaf-storm-troopers-attack-election-hustings/#IDComment69025485</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : UPDATED -- IPPR Attack on BNP Is a “Lie” by a Labour Party Front Using Taxpayers&#039; Money</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/ippr-attack-on-bnp-is-a-lie-by-a-labour-party-front-using-taxpayers-money/#IDComment68826513</link>
<description>So BNP support is due to social breakdown then? And what causes that breakdown in the first place? I was taken aback by the brazen audacity of this report, which more or less says that immigration is a good thing and leads to a cohesive community. Pure boulderdash. There is social breakdown of course, and that also includes where indigenous whites are less friendlier and more suspiciuous of one another as a result of immigration.  Back to the election I see the media are talking up the surge in support for the LibDems. But in my opinion that is only because Clegg has a youthful suave charm about him, and so naive voters assume that his party presents a fresh direction. In reality Clegg or a Clegg-Brown pact would be worse for us then what we have now, as Lib Dems have no objection or concerete position on immmigration and even endorse giving citizenship to settled illegal entrants into Britain. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/ippr-attack-on-bnp-is-a-lie-by-a-labour-party-front-using-taxpayers-money/#IDComment68826513</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : The Madness of Tory/Labour Privatisation: German State about to Buy Arriva Trains and Busses in Brit</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/the-madness-of-torylabour-privatisation-german-state-about-to-buy-arriva-trains-and-busses-in-britain/#IDComment68798071</link>
<description>Thanks for posting this comment. I should reiterate that I&amp;#039;m all for keeping key infrastructure British, and it is definitely sad that so many major British businesses are selling out now.  But if such companies are renationalised in the future it should be done without hostility to the current owner, recognising that the world economy is so globalised that everyone owns a piece of each others pie.  It could also be argued that Britain less competent at running its own firms properly than it used to. British banks suffered the worst during the banking crisis, leading to Spanish owned Santander taking over the Alliance and Leiscester, and then later the Abbey National.  Perhaps greed and corruption lie at the heart of the problem, combined with a government not interested in British protectionism. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 06:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/the-madness-of-torylabour-privatisation-german-state-about-to-buy-arriva-trains-and-busses-in-britain/#IDComment68798071</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : The Madness of Tory/Labour Privatisation: German State about to Buy Arriva Trains and Busses in Brit</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/the-madness-of-torylabour-privatisation-german-state-about-to-buy-arriva-trains-and-busses-in-britain/#IDComment68732537</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m dismayed at some of the paranoid comments inferring Germany is somehow trying to takeover Britain commercially to subjugate us. What about the fact that British companies such as BT and BP for example owns stakes in companies abroad? Should we demand that British firms sell their overseas enterprises? The worlds economy is heavily intertwined now, and if a foreign company buys another one here, it is more due to the success of that company rather than a covert agenda to domineer the culture here. Besides is there any evidence that part or full German ownership of firms here being detrimental?. While pulling out the EU is important for all of us, withdrawing from a globalised economy won&amp;#039;t be a quick and easy affair , and we should not instantly assume that all foreign investment is a bad idea. Concentrating on helping British business become compteitive again, and ensuring public service industries are retained here for pride and control is a priority.  Well, I hope my controversial comment  can make it past moderation.. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/the-madness-of-torylabour-privatisation-german-state-about-to-buy-arriva-trains-and-busses-in-britain/#IDComment68732537</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : The Madness of Tory/Labour Privatisation: German State about to Buy Arriva Trains and Busses in Brit</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/the-madness-of-torylabour-privatisation-german-state-about-to-buy-arriva-trains-and-busses-in-britain/#IDComment68728650</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t think we should be hostile towards foreign companies for doing what is standard business practice now. After all British multinationals have major stakes in companies in other countries. Any reversal of certain industries from private to state control should be done amicably, except in exceptional cases where a foreign firm has shown itself to be incompetent or negligent in running a service sector enterprise. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 18:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/the-madness-of-torylabour-privatisation-german-state-about-to-buy-arriva-trains-and-busses-in-britain/#IDComment68728650</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : The Madness of Tory/Labour Privatisation: German State about to Buy Arriva Trains and Busses in Brit</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/the-madness-of-torylabour-privatisation-german-state-about-to-buy-arriva-trains-and-busses-in-britain/#IDComment68712628</link>
<description>I myself support the BNPs policy of re-nationalisation of the railways, but having said that this latest move is not a shock given the level of international ownership of big firms in all industry sectors. Rover is another example. It&amp;#039;s just a consequence of increasing globalisation, and not confined to Britain either.  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 15:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/the-madness-of-torylabour-privatisation-german-state-about-to-buy-arriva-trains-and-busses-in-britain/#IDComment68712628</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : Media Talk up Lib Dem Leader -- But Ignore His Election Promise to Let Illegal Immigrants become Cit</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/media-talk-up-lib-dem-leader-but-ignore-his-election-promise-to-let-illegal-immigrants-become-citizens/#IDComment68572545</link>
<description>Yes, I thought the same too. They are trying to suppres s presenting the alernative parties to the public because they know one particular one has a popular policies disillusioned voters agree with. No need to mention what party that is. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 18:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/media-talk-up-lib-dem-leader-but-ignore-his-election-promise-to-let-illegal-immigrants-become-citizens/#IDComment68572545</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : UPDATED: Sri Lankans, Not Somalis -- UKIP’s “Anti-Islamification” and “Anti-Immigration” P</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/updated-sri-lankans-not-somalis-ukip%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9canti-islamification%e2%80%9d-and-%e2%80%9canti-immigration%e2%80%9d-posturing-exposed-as-hoax/#IDComment67956909</link>
<description>On the BBC election web site, if you look at each constituency page, it only lists 5 candidates for each constituency you can look up, not all of them. I assume the list is compiled on the basis of the most popular party votes from the last [2005] general election. Thus any unassuming reader might think the BNP is only standing in a few areas, rather than the 323 seats it&amp;#039;s contesting. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/updated-sri-lankans-not-somalis-ukip%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9canti-islamification%e2%80%9d-and-%e2%80%9canti-immigration%e2%80%9d-posturing-exposed-as-hoax/#IDComment67956909</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : UPDATED: Sri Lankans, Not Somalis -- UKIP’s “Anti-Islamification” and “Anti-Immigration” P</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/updated-sri-lankans-not-somalis-ukip%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9canti-islamification%e2%80%9d-and-%e2%80%9canti-immigration%e2%80%9d-posturing-exposed-as-hoax/#IDComment67763959</link>
<description>Well done. Word of mouth is still a powerful influence, especially to motivate people to read the BNP web site themselves to understand official policies. And verbal persuasion is also useful for voters who don&amp;#039;t have much time to read, research and mull over the manifestos of the competing parties. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/04/updated-sri-lankans-not-somalis-ukip%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9canti-islamification%e2%80%9d-and-%e2%80%9canti-immigration%e2%80%9d-posturing-exposed-as-hoax/#IDComment67763959</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>