<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/612725</link>
		<description>Comments by idaband</description>
<item>
<title>CSH.us : Windows 7 update</title>
<link>http://csh.us/2009/01/25/windows-7-update#IDComment36678813</link>
<description>sweet.....  pretty sure I&amp;#039;m going to have win7 64 up tomorrow...rocking with 8 Gigs of ram.  Also...to comment on your site...I&amp;#039;ve been thinking about going to intensedebate fora LONG time...now that you&amp;#039;ve done it...i&amp;#039;ll have to do it...got to love open ID.  I like that it uses gravater also :)  Now if we can find a way to snyc google reader comments with wordpress comments :) </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Oct 2009 03:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://csh.us/2009/01/25/windows-7-update#IDComment36678813</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Rob Conery : SubSonic 3.0.0.3 Is Released</title>
<link>http://blog.wekeroad.com/subsonic/subsonic-3-0-0-3-is-released/#IDComment28242011</link>
<description>I wanted to thank, Rob for all the great work he has done.  I wish I could find more time to dive into the source code.  I keep finding little bugs in 3.0.  It has reached the point to where I decided to stick with 2.0 for now.  I think I just want to wait for 3.0 to get a little more mature.  I think we all know what it&amp;#039;s like to dev so I&amp;#039;m not trying to complain.  I think its good stuff and I&amp;#039;ll continue to play with it, but I&amp;#039;ve just ran into a few too many problems for now.  Thanks for all the great work and look forward to more goodness coming. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.wekeroad.com/subsonic/subsonic-3-0-0-3-is-released/#IDComment28242011</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Rob Conery : SubSonic 3.0.0.3 Is Released</title>
<link>http://blog.wekeroad.com/subsonic/subsonic-3-0-0-3-is-released/#IDComment28203949</link>
<description>I wanted to add a username to save.  There is no overload now to support only a username as a parameter.  I guess I could manually add it in myself.  Might force me to learn t4 templates.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.wekeroad.com/subsonic/subsonic-3-0-0-3-is-released/#IDComment28203949</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Rob Conery : SubSonic 3.0.0.3 Is Released</title>
<link>http://blog.wekeroad.com/subsonic/subsonic-3-0-0-3-is-released/#IDComment28134986</link>
<description>does this seam too trivial but when we go to  object.save().  Why do we have to add a provider.  I think I&amp;#039;m missing something here.  Wasn&amp;#039;t it in 2.0 that we could just put in the &amp;quot;username&amp;quot; field and that was good.  But in 3.0 we need to manually add a provider?         Not a huge deal, but i was scratching my head for a second thinking... </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.wekeroad.com/subsonic/subsonic-3-0-0-3-is-released/#IDComment28134986</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>