<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/414604</link>
		<description>Comments by Ian Connor</description>
<item>
<title>davidrothman.net : *Really* Stupid Health Social Site</title>
<link>http://davidrothman.net/2009/04/25/really-stupid-social-health-site/#IDComment19931943</link>
<description>I think the issue is more that proper information on a drug comes through evidence based medicine rather than Web 2.0 internet sites.  I would prefer a double blind controlled study to anonymous web postings - especially when it comes to drugs. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://davidrothman.net/2009/04/25/really-stupid-social-health-site/#IDComment19931943</guid>
</item><item>
<title>davidrothman.net : Venting About a Vendor</title>
<link>http://davidrothman.net/2009/03/24/venting-about-a-lousy-vendor-sales-rep/#IDComment17568123</link>
<description>That is because we decided to make Pubget free to researchers and libraries. As a result, there is no price list. ;)&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; If you did want to snoop on me, my first business was ProjectLounge which is very upfront with the price list. However, bringing up the fact that you have a business that is honest does not help much in the negotiating either. You are just better to find another vendor that shares your ethics. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://davidrothman.net/2009/03/24/venting-about-a-lousy-vendor-sales-rep/#IDComment17568123</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>