<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/315541</link>
		<description>Comments by hunterboo1967</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Anti-Israel ads fuel controversy in Seattle</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.51f509667873509af134d2232a002dd1.61&amp;show_article=1#IDComment117670047</link>
<description>I thought America was running away from acting like Nazi Germany.Go figure!  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 16:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.51f509667873509af134d2232a002dd1.61&amp;show_article=1#IDComment117670047</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : The Heat is On: Congressman&#039;s Office Says Constituent Calls Are &#039;Harassment&#039;</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/03/19/the-heat-is-on-congressmans-office-says-constituent-calls-are-harassment/#IDComment63006802</link>
<description>Welcome to the dumbing down of America and the feminization of America.  We have jumped the shark.  I hope all Americans will throw all of them out (dems and repubs) and start with new &amp;quot;for the people&amp;quot; congress people.    &lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/yetn6zg&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/yetn6zg&lt;/a&gt;   Dem Congressman: &amp;quot;If You Don&amp;#039;t Tie Our Hands, We Will Keep Stealing&amp;quot;  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/03/19/the-heat-is-on-congressmans-office-says-constituent-calls-are-harassment/#IDComment63006802</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama faces tough question over Cabinet picks</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9689PR80#IDComment14903410</link>
<description>I am glad I didn&amp;#039;t vote for &amp;quot;change.&amp;quot;  As a business owner the only &amp;quot;change&amp;quot;  I can see with him is a few pennies in my pocket with this Obama crowd!  What amazes me is that the government thinks I am &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; when I employ 7 employees.  I don&amp;#039;t get it!  Here I am keeping 7 people off the government payroll and paying ssn taxes, etc for them too.  I think Washington forgets that taxes are actually the US citizens monies.  Maybe we should have another &amp;quot;Boston tea party.&amp;quot;    The only &amp;quot;change&amp;quot; I want is keep the bankers and government from overspending and being greedy.  Cheers. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9689PR80#IDComment14903410</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Simpson forgets lyrics, fights tears at Mich. show</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9667VL00#IDComment14816284</link>
<description>Maybe Obama and Jessica should have a press conference with both reading from a teleprompter.   Maybe their slogan could be  &amp;quot;Change&amp;quot;   Jessica....I am changing to be just like 99% of the American women out there, fat....&amp;quot;I am womyn hear me roar with food in my mouth!&amp;quot; Obama....Ha...you thought change would be good for you...sucker...the change I was talking about was keeping you paying more money to the government and me enjoying hiring people in my administration who don&amp;#039;t pay their taxes.  Wow....they both really sound just alike!:)  Actually....with women I enjoy the classy, petite, amazing cute womyn of Thailand where I go on vacation every year!  Cheers </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 7 Feb 2009 01:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9667VL00#IDComment14816284</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Simpson forgets lyrics, fights tears at Mich. show</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9667VL00#IDComment14812809</link>
<description>Hey Eric09....Obama did say something about Jessica&amp;#039;s weight.... on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stoptheaclu.com/archives/2009/02/02/nb....&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.stoptheaclu.com/archives/2009/02/02/nb...&lt;/a&gt;  Lauer: They took you out of it.   Obama: It &amp;mdash; it&amp;rsquo;s &amp;mdash; it&amp;rsquo;s a little hurtful.  Lauer: You got replaced by Jessica Simpson.  Obama: Yeah, who&amp;rsquo;s in a weight battle apparently. (LAUGHTER) Yeah. Oh, well.   She is sure a looker but I have never thought she was much of a singer.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Feb 2009 22:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9667VL00#IDComment14812809</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Mass. couple who led gay marriage fight to divorce</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D964BOHG2#IDComment14769268</link>
<description>The answer I feel is not primarily how we define marriage, even though this is important. An overemphasis in trying to define marriage might result in us mimicking one of our &amp;ldquo;entertaining&amp;rdquo; past Presidents &amp;ldquo;It depends on what the meaning of the word &amp;lsquo;is&amp;rsquo; is.&amp;rdquo; But what is of greater importance is determining who has the final word in telling us what marriage is; &amp;quot;we the people&amp;quot; as our Constitution states or rather have government telling us. I rather think we should be more interested in having a public debate via the voting venue, as we just completed in California via Proposition 8, then through arm twisting of laws forced by elected officials/ appointed officials/judges like with &amp;ldquo;Roe v. Wade&amp;rdquo; and another set of examples from the Ninth Circuit &amp;ldquo;circus&amp;rdquo; court of Appeals. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Feb 2009 05:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D964BOHG2#IDComment14769268</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Mass. couple who led gay marriage fight to divorce</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D964BOHG2#IDComment14751079</link>
<description>Great thought theLogic.  Since I am not a lawyer I don&amp;#039;t know if there are any rule differences between partnerships and marriages.  So I plead the fifth on that.  I have been married 1x and 13 years divorced (1 child who is 19 so I am done with child support)  now and see how government makes money on the whole divorce racket.  One has better luck in Vegas than in a marriage these days.   If we have to go through hoops to get a mortgage, get a driver&amp;#039;s license, and a divorce I think marriages should be a bunch of hoops to go through to help lower the divorce rate.  Marriage today is just &amp;quot;a flavor of candy&amp;quot; adult &amp;quot;kids&amp;quot; want to try out...no sense of commitment anymore.  The divorce laws changed in 1976 with &amp;quot;no fault divorce&amp;quot; option was allowed.   Side joke...what do you call two wedding rings?  Miniature handcuffs!:) Cheers.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D964BOHG2#IDComment14751079</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Mass. couple who led gay marriage fight to divorce</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D964BOHG2#IDComment14741297</link>
<description>Ah....great point &amp;quot;the Larch....&amp;quot;the problem is that the state should not be in the business of defining marriage which for the most part is a religious ceremony.&amp;quot;  I fully agree....but here is the &amp;quot;rest of the story&amp;quot;.....show me da money!  The state/government is involved in marriage simply because of money....they make money off of divorces....mix and match them any which way but with a divorce comes lawyers (special place in hell for them) then the judge (yep, also a lawyer), then court persons, cops to enforce, if there is child support so another group of government employees, jails to house the disobedient and who knows who else in the divorce racket .....heck....it is a money circus out there.  Bottom line....government LOVES money from divorces and will suck every penny up....so a joke I heard last week...what does a three ring circus look like.....engagement ring, wedding ring....and suffering!    For me and this bald head of mine...we are staying single...amen to living without a ball and chain and having money to boot!:)Cheers. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D964BOHG2#IDComment14741297</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Mass. couple who led gay marriage fight to divorce</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D964BOHG2#IDComment14735221</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Who gets the house and kids?&amp;quot;  That is a great question.  If it was a man and womyn marriage the wife would get the kids, alimony, child support, house, car, and the man would get.....!  Now this will be funny...I guess it all depends on who was the &amp;quot;wife&amp;quot; in the marriage and who was the &amp;quot;man.&amp;quot;  I am thinking I am liking this circus!! </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Feb 2009 23:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D964BOHG2#IDComment14735221</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Mass. couple who led gay marriage fight to divorce</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D964BOHG2#IDComment14734797</link>
<description>Mmmm...I thought the gay lifestyle was the &amp;quot;bomb.&amp;quot;  If womyn aren&amp;#039;t happy with men and now they aren&amp;#039;t happy with womyn...maybe next on the chain of happiness comes...cats?  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Feb 2009 23:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D964BOHG2#IDComment14734797</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>