<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/720884</link>
		<description>Comments by haubey</description>
<item>
<title>webOSroundup : appSpotlight is live!! Find the best apps.</title>
<link>http://www.webosroundup.com/2010/09/appspotlight-is-live-find-the-best-apps/#IDComment99252493</link>
<description>I like the just type reference in the search box.  great job you guys! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 22:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.webosroundup.com/2010/09/appspotlight-is-live-find-the-best-apps/#IDComment99252493</guid>
</item><item>
<title>webOSroundup : First WOR Hackathon a Success!</title>
<link>http://www.webosroundup.com/2010/08/first-wor-hackathon-a-success/#IDComment94713509</link>
<description>Yeah great job to everyone who participated.  It&amp;#039;s an amazing feat in two respects: 1) that you guys built and completed an app in around 12 hours, and 2) the webOS community has this many people that will come together like this.  I wished I could have helped, but school starts tomorrow, and, well let&amp;#039;s just say I wasn&amp;#039;t too diligent about my summer work ;). But great job to everybody! </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 19:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.webosroundup.com/2010/08/first-wor-hackathon-a-success/#IDComment94713509</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechTrackr : Why iPhone &#039;Multitasking&#039; Isn&#039;t Really Multitasking (and How It Could Be)</title>
<link>http://techtrackr.com/2010/04/10/why-iphone-multitasking-isnt-really-multitasking-and-how-it-could-be/#IDComment68739278</link>
<description>Actually, Travis, the Task Completion offered by Apple is meant more for uploading pictures to Flickr and things of that nature.  It is not for the loading of apps.  While the name might suggest the ability for 3rd Party apps the utilize the processor while not in the foreground, that is not the case. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 20:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techtrackr.com/2010/04/10/why-iphone-multitasking-isnt-really-multitasking-and-how-it-could-be/#IDComment68739278</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechTrackr : The Coolest iPad Gadgets</title>
<link>http://techtrackr.com/2010/04/13/the-coolest-ipad-gadgets/#IDComment68116795</link>
<description>Hi marc. I just looked into the issue and found nothing wrong with our feeds.  The link up top and the link in our bottom bar should take you to our Feed Burner page.  From there you should be able to subscribe using many applications.  Could you please elaborate on what happened to you specifically so we can help you sort it out? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techtrackr.com/2010/04/13/the-coolest-ipad-gadgets/#IDComment68116795</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechTrackr : Verizon iPhone: Why All the Hype?</title>
<link>http://techtrackr.com/2010/04/05/verizon-iphone-why-all-the-hype/#IDComment66058820</link>
<description>Yes that&amp;#039;s true.  Clearwire has stated if need be they can change their infrastructure and go LTE.  However what I think you&amp;#039;re missing is the networks are completely separate from each other.  Different spectrums and different frequencies.  Right now, the only reason Sprint (and once other companies get their 4G networks up) is putting a 3G radio in to the EVO 4G is because there isn&amp;#039;t always going to be 4G coverage.  Otherwise the 3G network isn&amp;#039;t going to be accessed unless for phone calls on the 1xRTT network, but that&amp;#039;s getting into an entirely different discussion about how networks work on a basic level. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Apr 2010 15:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techtrackr.com/2010/04/05/verizon-iphone-why-all-the-hype/#IDComment66058820</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechTrackr : Verizon iPhone: Why All the Hype?</title>
<link>http://techtrackr.com/2010/04/05/verizon-iphone-why-all-the-hype/#IDComment66056381</link>
<description>Hey Matt, nice to see you.  Just to clarify some statements from your previous comment, the 4G WiMax network sprint is implementing (with Clearwire) has nothing to do with their existing 3G CDMA network.  They are on two completely different spectrums and are co-existing peacefully in many cities right now.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Apr 2010 15:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techtrackr.com/2010/04/05/verizon-iphone-why-all-the-hype/#IDComment66056381</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechTrackr : Techtrackr Poll Question: Do you have an Ipod Cable?</title>
<link>http://techtrackr.com/2009/11/04/techtrackr-poll-question-do-you-have-an-ipod-cable/#IDComment54910667</link>
<description>OK, and just wondering, why did you post this on a 3 month old article when you&#039;ve obviously read an article on this website pertaining to the iPad?</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Feb 2010 22:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techtrackr.com/2009/11/04/techtrackr-poll-question-do-you-have-an-ipod-cable/#IDComment54910667</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechTrackr : New NVIDIA GPU Code Named GF100</title>
<link>http://techtrackr.com/2010/01/31/new-nvidia-gpu-code-named-gf100/#IDComment54756254</link>
<description>Actually it was Jake who wrote this article, but on thanks from both of us.  And your link is broken.  I&#039;ll try to see if I can fix it and go over to your site.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Feb 2010 03:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techtrackr.com/2010/01/31/new-nvidia-gpu-code-named-gf100/#IDComment54756254</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechTrackr : My Views on the iPad</title>
<link>http://techtrackr.com/2010/01/28/my-views-on-the-ipad/#IDComment54291838</link>
<description>Actually I think the processor is the most interesting thing to come out of this whole tablet debacle.  Having a 1Ghz ARM processor (like Snapdragon) is a very nice thing to have, and while they limit its capabilities with the modified iPhone 3.2 software, it seems to be very efficient.  I\\\&#039;m not saying that Apple is going to switch back to PowerPC form Intel, because that would be a bad move, but it will be interesting to see in what other ways PA Semi will help Apple with its future products. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techtrackr.com/2010/01/28/my-views-on-the-ipad/#IDComment54291838</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechTrackr : Follow us on Facebook!</title>
<link>http://techtrackr.com/2010/01/25/follow-us-on-facebook/#IDComment53979610</link>
<description>Actually I tried to and it says we are not eligible. Also we should probably keep these conversations off of the comments. :) </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techtrackr.com/2010/01/25/follow-us-on-facebook/#IDComment53979610</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechTrackr : New Apple Tablet More Than Just Big iPhone?</title>
<link>http://techtrackr.com/2010/01/10/new-apple-tablet-more-than-just-big-iphone/#IDComment53938636</link>
<description>Martin, the RSS comes with Wordpress, and the theme comes with a link up at the top right that we just tie into the right linkage, which happens to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techtrackr.com/feed&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.techtrackr.com/feed&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techtrackr.com/2010/01/10/new-apple-tablet-more-than-just-big-iphone/#IDComment53938636</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechTrackr : Palm Wows Once Again at CES</title>
<link>http://techtrackr.com/2010/01/08/palm-wows-once-again-at-ces/#IDComment51029268</link>
<description>i could because sprint changed the contract so i could walk without an ETF, but I don&amp;#039;t know the prices and Verizon&amp;#039;s plans are much more expensive.  If it is cheaper to switch to Verizon and I can sell my Pre for a good price, perhaps I wil, but probably not. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techtrackr.com/2010/01/08/palm-wows-once-again-at-ces/#IDComment51029268</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechTrackr : IE8 Slaughters the Browser Competition</title>
<link>http://techtrackr.com/2010/01/05/ie8-slaughters-the-browser-competition/#IDComment50584638</link>
<description>actually If I&amp;#039;m not mistaken, the IE portion of the graph includes all versions of IE, not just 8.  Remember, a lot of corporate systems are still using good ol&amp;#039; IE 6.  In our case here at Techtrackr, all-time, FIrefox has 32%, followed by Safari at 27%, followed Chrome at 17%, and IE is in 4th place with 15%.  I guess the tech enthusiasts know what browsers are best. Perhaps we shall have a browser war sometime in the future. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Jan 2010 03:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techtrackr.com/2010/01/05/ie8-slaughters-the-browser-competition/#IDComment50584638</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechTrackr : Most important tech of 2009</title>
<link>http://techtrackr.com/2009/12/29/most-important-tech-of-200/#IDComment49526639</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s possible, but we could talk about what the people think is the most important. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 03:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techtrackr.com/2009/12/29/most-important-tech-of-200/#IDComment49526639</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechTrackr : Techtrackr WIR: Apple is Evil Edition</title>
<link>http://techtrackr.com/2009/12/13/podcast-episode-4/#IDComment47026316</link>
<description>Thanks for listening.  In what ways would you like to see us improve in.  Like the stories, sound quality.  Also, could you define what you mean by &amp;#039;pace.&amp;#039;  Thanks for you input. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techtrackr.com/2009/12/13/podcast-episode-4/#IDComment47026316</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechTrackr : AT&amp;T and Verizon Drop Lawsuits</title>
<link>http://techtrackr.com/2009/12/02/att-and-verizon-drop-lawsuits/#IDComment45804677</link>
<description>We&amp;#039;re looking into it.  I&amp;#039;ll tell Matthew (he&amp;#039;s the admin) and we&amp;#039;ll have it sorted out in no time. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Dec 2009 14:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techtrackr.com/2009/12/02/att-and-verizon-drop-lawsuits/#IDComment45804677</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>