<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/553396</link>
		<description>Comments by glassjaw643</description>
<item>
<title>ScreenCrave : Why Terminator Salvation Isn&#039;t a Terminator Film</title>
<link>http://screencrave.com/2009-05-27/why-terminator-salvation-isnt-a-terminator-film/#IDComment22544986</link>
<description>Every review on this movie is the same-This doesn&amp;#039;t follow any other Terminators-. OF COURSE IT DOESN&amp;#039;T! DUH! How many times are we going to see a special Terminator going after John Connor?   This movies takes place 11 years before Kyle Reese get&amp;#039;s sent back in time. Hence,  11 years before Skynet learns how to send machines via time travel. The T-600&amp;#039;s are just being created now. They&amp;#039;re now just coming online. This movies fits perfectly how T1 opens up. You have the Terminators with the plastic faces(as Kyle discusses to Sarah). It&amp;#039;s the first stage man! Relax!   john Connor isn&amp;#039;t even a leader yet.... he&amp;#039;s in his Neo stage of The Matrix part 1. He&amp;#039;s only a supposed prophecy! Wait until the next two come out. McG brought up an idea to bring in a now looking older Robert Patrick in as a scientist who learns how to develop his body in a younger state.(Where the T1000 gets born).  give it a rest. This was a above average movie. I&amp;#039;m sick of seeing more time travel. This is the future. Man Vs. Machine </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 18:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://screencrave.com/2009-05-27/why-terminator-salvation-isnt-a-terminator-film/#IDComment22544986</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>