<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/507634</link>
		<description>Comments by giggitygoo</description>
<item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Note: Mets to Erase Doc&#039;s Signature</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/20/note-mets-to-erase-docs-signature/#IDComment19440594</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t understand the point of view that the level of Mets history on display at Citi Field needs to be subdued in some way simply because they don&amp;#039;t have as long or as celebrated a history as the team across town. It&amp;#039;s the Mets home field - why not celebrate the history we do have? Why not have more areas dedicated to the &amp;#039;69 and &amp;#039;86 Mets and the greats that played on those teams? There should be some place for Doc to sign, if not this particular wall. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/20/note-mets-to-erase-docs-signature/#IDComment19440594</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>