<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/675493</link>
		<description>Comments by frosteetoes</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : In Memoriam: Andrew Breitbart (1969-2012)</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/in-memoriam-andrew-breitbart-1969-2012/#IDComment305580062</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m shocked. No, not Andrew..dear God. Only 43. I hope the coroner will do an honest exam and assessment of his autopsy otherwise a second opinion from an independent medical examiner should be retained. Not suggesting a conspiracy here but Andrew said that he had stuff on Obama back from his college days. What will become of this? I hope it&amp;#039;s secure and a trusted person has the key.   God Bless Andrew!! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 17:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/in-memoriam-andrew-breitbart-1969-2012/#IDComment305580062</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Christie&#039;s Epic Beat Down Of WaPo Reporter, Obama On Same-Sex Marriage Hypocrisy</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/christie-hammers-wapo-reporter-obama-on-same-sex-marriage/#IDComment300245071</link>
<description>Anyone who can slap down a liberal, especially someone with attitude, is alright in my book.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 03:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/christie-hammers-wapo-reporter-obama-on-same-sex-marriage/#IDComment300245071</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Flashback 2005: Wasserman Schultz Blames Gas Prices On GOP</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/flashback-2005-wasserman-schultz-blames-gas-prices-on-gop/#IDComment300236699</link>
<description>Oh look, Little Debbie brought her sex toy in to demonstrate her point.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 03:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/flashback-2005-wasserman-schultz-blames-gas-prices-on-gop/#IDComment300236699</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Sacha Baron Cohen&#039;s Dictator Doesn&#039;t Belong at Oscars</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/02/23/sacha-baron-cohens-dictator-doesnt-belong-at-oscars/#IDComment300234544</link>
<description>That&amp;#039;s too bad. If they allowed him to come in character there might have been a pretty good chance that a bunch of liberal pompous a$$es all in one place would hear Allah Akbar as their last sound.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 03:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/02/23/sacha-baron-cohens-dictator-doesnt-belong-at-oscars/#IDComment300234544</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Sacha Baron Cohen&#039;s Dictator Doesn&#039;t Belong at Oscars</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/02/23/sacha-baron-cohens-dictator-doesnt-belong-at-oscars/#IDComment300228689</link>
<description>Hahaha!! So true. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 03:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/02/23/sacha-baron-cohens-dictator-doesnt-belong-at-oscars/#IDComment300228689</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : When Did the President Know and Who Did He Tell?</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/cstreet/2011/08/08/when-did-the-president-know-and-who-did-he-tell/#IDComment181311054</link>
<description>Is there any correlation with George Soros retiring from destroying economies and this disaster? Like, mission accomplished?  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Aug 2011 19:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/cstreet/2011/08/08/when-did-the-president-know-and-who-did-he-tell/#IDComment181311054</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Reason.tv: What&#039;s the Libertarian Position on Abortion?</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/06/16/reason-tv-whats-the-libertarian-position-on-abortion/#IDComment163402993</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s really not hard to stand firm against fetalcide if you can imagine yourself as a person in the same situation. You find yourself in a warm comfortable environment when suddenly your skin is burning, all over and it&amp;#039;s painful. You&amp;#039;re dying a painful death when a suction hose comes in and your delicate little body is being dismembered by this hose sucking you in with such a force. You&amp;#039;re now dead.  Can you imagine this being done to you? What did this helpless soul do to deserve such a violent end? Even our pet&amp;#039;s are euthanized more humanly than an abortion of a developing human baby. What kind of society does this to their young? If you don&amp;#039;t want to be pregnant then take precautions. If that fails then except the consequences of your actions.  That baby has every right to be here as much as you and me.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 05:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/06/16/reason-tv-whats-the-libertarian-position-on-abortion/#IDComment163402993</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : *Live Stream* Anthony Weiner Meets the Press - Ongoing Coverage</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/live-stream-anthony-weiner-meets-the-press/#IDComment160109686</link>
<description>Hahaha A reporter asked if he was fully erect or if he had more...lol </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/live-stream-anthony-weiner-meets-the-press/#IDComment160109686</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : *Live Stream* Anthony Weiner Meets the Press - Ongoing Coverage</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/live-stream-anthony-weiner-meets-the-press/#IDComment160108327</link>
<description>BREITBART!!!  RELEASE THE KRAKEN!! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/live-stream-anthony-weiner-meets-the-press/#IDComment160108327</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Michael Moore Kills Capitalism with Kool-Aid</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mcovel/2009/10/02/michael-moore-kills-capitalism-with-kool-aid/#IDComment36838227</link>
<description>This is merely an opinion but it was deleted from Newsmax and it is a worthy read:  9/29/09 11:37 PM Obama Risks a Domestic Military &amp;lsquo;Intervention&amp;rsquo; Page 1 of 2 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsmax.com/john_perry/obama_military_coup/2009/09/29/266012.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.newsmax.com/john_perry/obama_military_...&lt;/a&gt; John L. Perry Obama Risks a Domestic Military &amp;lsquo;Intervention&amp;rsquo; Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:35 AM By: John L. Perry There is a remote, although gaining, possibility America&amp;rsquo;s military will intervene as a last resort to resolve the &amp;ldquo;Obama problem.&amp;rdquo; Don&amp;rsquo;t dismiss it as unrealistic. America isn&amp;rsquo;t the Third World. If a military coup does occur here it will be civilized. That it has never happened doesn&amp;rsquo;t mean it wont. Describing what may be afoot is not to advocate it. So, view the following through military eyes: Officers swear to &amp;ldquo;support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.&amp;rdquo; Unlike enlisted personnel, they do not swear to &amp;ldquo;obey the orders of the president of the United States.&amp;rdquo; Top military officers can see the Constitution they are sworn to defend being trampled as American institutions and enterprises are nationalized. They can see that Americans are increasingly alarmed that this nation, under President Barack Obama, may not even be recognizable as America by the 2012 election, in which he will surely seek continuation in office. They can see that the economy &amp;mdash; ravaged by deficits, taxes, unemployment, and impending inflation &amp;mdash; is financially reliant on foreign lender governments. They can see this president waging undeclared war on the intelligence community, without whose rigorous and independent functions the armed services are rendered blind in an ever-more hostile world overseas and at home. They can see the dismantling of defenses against missiles targeted at this nation by avowed enemies, even as America&amp;rsquo;s troop strength is allowed to sag. They can see the horror of major warfare erupting simultaneously in two, and possibly three, far-flung theaters before America can react in time. They can see the nation&amp;rsquo;s safety and their own military establishments and honor placed in jeopardy as never before. So, if you are one of those observant military professionals, what do you do? Wait until this president bungles into losing the war in Afghanistan, and Pakistan&amp;rsquo;s arsenal of nuclear bombs falls into the hands of militant Islam? Wait until Israel is forced to launch air strikes on Iran&amp;rsquo;s nuclear-bomb plants, and the Middle East explodes, destabilizing or subjugating the Free World? What happens if the generals Obama sent to win the Afghan war are told by this president (who now says, &amp;ldquo;I&amp;rsquo;m not interested in victory&amp;rdquo;) that they will be denied troops they must have to win? Do they follow orders they cannot carry out, consistent with their oath of duty? Do they resign en masse? Or do they soldier on, hoping the 2010 congressional elections will reverse the situation? Do they dare gamble the national survival on such political whims? 9/29/09 11:37 PM Obama Risks a Domestic Military &amp;lsquo;Intervention&amp;rsquo; Page 2 of 2 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsmax.com/john_perry/obama_military_coup/2009/09/29/266012.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.newsmax.com/john_perry/obama_military_...&lt;/a&gt; Anyone who imagines that those thoughts are not weighing heavily on the intellect and conscience of America&amp;rsquo;s military leadership is lost in a fool&amp;rsquo;s fog. Will the day come when patriotic general and flag officers sit down with the president, or with those who control him, and work out the national equivalent of a &amp;ldquo;family intervention,&amp;rdquo; with some form of limited, shared responsibility? Imagine a bloodless coup to restore and defend the Constitution through an interim administration that would do the serious business of governing and defending the nation. Skilled, military-trained, nation-builders would replace accountability-challenged, radical-left commissars. Having bonded with his twin teleprompters, the president would be detailed for ceremonial speech-making. Military intervention is what Obama&amp;rsquo;s exponentially accelerating agenda for &amp;ldquo;fundamental change&amp;rdquo; toward a Marxist state is inviting upon America. A coup is not an ideal option, but Obama&amp;rsquo;s radical ideal is not acceptable or reversible. Unthinkable? Then think up an alternative, non-violent solution to the Obama problem. Just don&amp;rsquo;t shrug and say, &amp;ldquo;We can always worry about that later.&amp;rdquo; In the 2008 election, that was the wistful, self-indulgent, indifferent reliance on abnegation of personal responsibility that has sunk the nation into this morass. John L. Perry, a prize-winning newspaper editor and writer who served on White House staffs of two presidents, is a regular columnist for Newsmax.com. Read John Perry&amp;#039;s columns here. &amp;copy; 2009 Newsmax. All rights reserved. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mcovel/2009/10/02/michael-moore-kills-capitalism-with-kool-aid/#IDComment36838227</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>