en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/779584 Comments by fortis23 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.f32abb74f95d14a6936ec9b64350d636.41&show_article=1#IDComment291828934 "Finns." I'm not sure what sort of history books you've been reading, but quite frankly, they sound pretty terrible. Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:28:08 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.f32abb74f95d14a6936ec9b64350d636.41&show_article=1#IDComment291828934 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.f32abb74f95d14a6936ec9b64350d636.41&show_article=1#IDComment291313618 I like the cut of your jib. Have an upvote. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:40:54 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.f32abb74f95d14a6936ec9b64350d636.41&show_article=1#IDComment291313618 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.7e2f54df1b9c336e0daa5210d53c3682.171&show_article=1#IDComment286705178 You take your "facts" and "logic" somewhere else, we're having a good old-fashioned rabble here. Wed, 8 Feb 2012 02:45:15 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.7e2f54df1b9c336e0daa5210d53c3682.171&show_article=1#IDComment286705178 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.7e2f54df1b9c336e0daa5210d53c3682.171&show_article=1#IDComment286704304 Ah, politics. The DoD proposes budget cuts, and people scream about how Obama is gutting the military (and not, y'know, cutting things we arguably don't need.) The DoD runs a large-scale exercise (to, you know, prepare for war) and suddenly Obama is planning a secret war against "conservatives." I remember this one time when people used to assess current events in light of their actual significance, and not make snap judgments based on their political leanings. Good times. Wed, 8 Feb 2012 02:43:48 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.7e2f54df1b9c336e0daa5210d53c3682.171&show_article=1#IDComment286704304 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.7e2f54df1b9c336e0daa5210d53c3682.171&show_article=1#IDComment286701604 Nah, I think it's as ridiculous now as I did back in 2008. And 2004. Wed, 8 Feb 2012 02:39:08 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.7e2f54df1b9c336e0daa5210d53c3682.171&show_article=1#IDComment286701604 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.91b253005449a712d5f91d08e5754186.2d1&show_article=1#IDComment275949888 I don't have any way to disprove your credentials, but I'm skeptical. Then again, I guess if Jack Thompson can be a lawyer... Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:42:03 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.91b253005449a712d5f91d08e5754186.2d1&show_article=1#IDComment275949888 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.91b253005449a712d5f91d08e5754186.2d1&show_article=1#IDComment275945960 Exactly. Defense cuts happen - under GWB, the US shut down two entire ICBM squadrons, comprising 100 missiles, and who knows how many warheads. One of those squadrons was the only one still operating the Peacekeeper, our most advanced ICBM ever. Why? Simply because they weren't needed any more. But for some reason, it's okay when a guy in red makes the decision, but the END OF THE WORLD when a guy in blue does it. Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:36:07 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.91b253005449a712d5f91d08e5754186.2d1&show_article=1#IDComment275945960 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.91b253005449a712d5f91d08e5754186.2d1&show_article=1#IDComment275568384 Would you care to back that up with some actual articles, and not just a ridiculous interpretation of the preamble (which is not legally authoritative)? Fri, 27 Jan 2012 04:14:06 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.91b253005449a712d5f91d08e5754186.2d1&show_article=1#IDComment275568384 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.91b253005449a712d5f91d08e5754186.2d1&show_article=1#IDComment275566194 I don't think that's entirely illogical, given that we spend 60% of our tax dollars on national security and the remaining 40% is divvied up between everything from the Department of Energy (who, among other things, owns our nuclear stockpile) to NASA to the Department of Transportation. Fri, 27 Jan 2012 04:10:51 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.91b253005449a712d5f91d08e5754186.2d1&show_article=1#IDComment275566194 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.91b253005449a712d5f91d08e5754186.2d1&show_article=1#IDComment275561868 Interesting, I didn't know that. "To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years; To provide and maintain a Navy;" Fri, 27 Jan 2012 04:03:01 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.91b253005449a712d5f91d08e5754186.2d1&show_article=1#IDComment275561868 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.91b253005449a712d5f91d08e5754186.2d1&show_article=1#IDComment275559860 Ehh. We aren't in Iraq any more, and we're still better-equipped and trained than any other army in the world. Not terribly concerned. Fri, 27 Jan 2012 03:59:25 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.91b253005449a712d5f91d08e5754186.2d1&show_article=1#IDComment275559860 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SE98980&show_article=1#IDComment272556239 It makes me sad that blatant racism can get voted +5. Tue, 24 Jan 2012 01:05:03 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SE98980&show_article=1#IDComment272556239 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SE98980&show_article=1#IDComment272553158 I expressed dismay at the apparent willingness of most of the commentators to try and scapegoat their political enemies for things that said enemies [probably] had nothing to do with, you extrapolated that to some tenuous conclusion about my political/social views. Masterful leap of logic, there. And before you say "LOL FAST AND FURIOUS I WIN" - while F&F was a thoroughly stupid and questionably moral/ethical thing to do, drug cartels have been killing people in Mexico since well before it and they're going to keep doing so as long as someone, somewhere is willing to get them weapons. Tue, 24 Jan 2012 01:00:11 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SE98980&show_article=1#IDComment272553158 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SE98980&show_article=1#IDComment272550161 I figured it was conveyed appropriately enough by my displeasure at the lack of it. Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:55:27 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SE98980&show_article=1#IDComment272550161 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SE98980&show_article=1#IDComment272116300 And as usual in the comments, people display no shock or other appropriate emotions for people getting killed, but instead fall over each other to take cheap shots at politicians they don't like. You stay classy, Drudge readers. Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:45:58 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SE98980&show_article=1#IDComment272116300 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.738ef6b31b4004f4b2c8cd0cdf719ea3.b1&show_article=1#IDComment269159658 I admitted I was wrong, which is more than the majority of people I argue with on here are [apparently] capable of doing. But, yeah. Space debris is a serious problem for manned/unmanned spacecraft (Fun fact: the Air Force spends a good bit of effort tracking space debris to avoid damage to satellites, space stations, and the like) and even to us on Earth from time to time. ... so the US gets together with a bunch of other countries to come up with some sort of code to prevent this kind of thing from happening, and your apparent first reaction is not to objectively consider whether this is a good idea (which it is, regardless of who's in office) but to assume it was a bad idea simply because of the involvement of someone from a political party you don't like, and throw an ad-hominem cheap shot accordingly. Fri, 20 Jan 2012 01:41:13 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.738ef6b31b4004f4b2c8cd0cdf719ea3.b1&show_article=1#IDComment269159658 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.738ef6b31b4004f4b2c8cd0cdf719ea3.b1&show_article=1#IDComment268262250 My bad, I didn't read the article well enough. But my point still stands. Thu, 19 Jan 2012 02:48:13 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.738ef6b31b4004f4b2c8cd0cdf719ea3.b1&show_article=1#IDComment268262250 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.738ef6b31b4004f4b2c8cd0cdf719ea3.b1&show_article=1#IDComment267387503 Try and shut off your knee-jerk "blame Obama for everything" reaction for a second, and consider that orbiting debris is actually a serious danger to manned and unmanned spacecraft, and that rogue satellites could endanger people here on Earth if they happen to crash in the wrong place. Wed, 18 Jan 2012 04:50:02 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.738ef6b31b4004f4b2c8cd0cdf719ea3.b1&show_article=1#IDComment267387503 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.b5d75662f9bec52ad5a6533dd7b16ae5.251&show_article=1#IDComment260022910 "Now, it is true that one of the crew members is ill... slightly ill. But the other two pilots... they're just fine. They're at the controls flying the plane... free to pursue a life of religious fulfillment. " Tue, 10 Jan 2012 02:45:34 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.b5d75662f9bec52ad5a6533dd7b16ae5.251&show_article=1#IDComment260022910 http://www.broomfieldenterprise.com/broomfield-news/ci_19699686?source=rss#IDComment258839125 9_9 Sun, 8 Jan 2012 21:08:46 +0000 http://www.broomfieldenterprise.com/broomfield-news/ci_19699686?source=rss#IDComment258839125