en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/2695361 Comments by meatay http://www.evenews24.com/2012/07/11/eveoganda-presents-1v1-eve-comic-video-1/#IDComment401147618 Love it Fri, 13 Jul 2012 18:39:42 +0000 http://www.evenews24.com/2012/07/11/eveoganda-presents-1v1-eve-comic-video-1/#IDComment401147618 http://eveoganda.blogspot.com/2012/07/thukk-you-eon-ad.html#IDComment394987147 Very nice, also I like the new site as well. Tue, 3 Jul 2012 19:47:01 +0000 http://eveoganda.blogspot.com/2012/07/thukk-you-eon-ad.html#IDComment394987147 http://eveoganda.blogspot.com/2011/11/2012-sanctuary-rookie-mini-games.html#IDComment216917099 Love it! Fri, 4 Nov 2011 19:10:34 +0000 http://eveoganda.blogspot.com/2011/11/2012-sanctuary-rookie-mini-games.html#IDComment216917099 http://www.evenews24.com/2011/10/10/dev-blog-capital-ship-balancing/#IDComment205649679 Other than losing the Moro's drone bay which I thought made it one of the more reasonably useful dreads and might have been worth adding to the others instead of taking away this looks pretty nice. I'm still thinking dreads will be basically useless though, but perhaps the shorter siege cycle will somehow have an impact. Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:29:13 +0000 http://www.evenews24.com/2011/10/10/dev-blog-capital-ship-balancing/#IDComment205649679 http://www.evenews24.com/2011/09/16/five-bil-giveaway-lets-put-a-name-on-that-eve-online-winter-expansion/#IDComment192150375 seems like only negative voting Sun, 11 Sep 2011 06:07:55 +0000 http://www.evenews24.com/2011/09/16/five-bil-giveaway-lets-put-a-name-on-that-eve-online-winter-expansion/#IDComment192150375 http://www.evenews24.com/2011/09/16/five-bil-giveaway-lets-put-a-name-on-that-eve-online-winter-expansion/#IDComment191754694 EvE: Ruination Sat, 10 Sep 2011 02:43:45 +0000 http://www.evenews24.com/2011/09/16/five-bil-giveaway-lets-put-a-name-on-that-eve-online-winter-expansion/#IDComment191754694 http://eveoganda.blogspot.com/2011/07/idiots-guide-d-scanner.html#IDComment174046659 :) Sat, 16 Jul 2011 04:25:08 +0000 http://eveoganda.blogspot.com/2011/07/idiots-guide-d-scanner.html#IDComment174046659 http://aufescapevelocity.blogspot.com/2011/07/night-thiefs-is-looking-for-pvp-pilots.html#IDComment173246232 Oh yeah, we kill people in all parts of EvE :) Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:32:56 +0000 http://aufescapevelocity.blogspot.com/2011/07/night-thiefs-is-looking-for-pvp-pilots.html#IDComment173246232 http://eveoganda.blogspot.com/2011/07/docking-tactic-or-cowardice.html#IDComment172341647 To deny the enemy what they want is a battle tactic in all realms of war. Causing your enemy to waste time and resources may not show up on the kb but IMO could be considered a form of pvp in itself. I'm not saying it's cool to do so but I do believe the statement that it is a tactic is correct. Just as much as login traps Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:52:48 +0000 http://eveoganda.blogspot.com/2011/07/docking-tactic-or-cowardice.html#IDComment172341647 http://aufescapevelocity.blogspot.com/2011/07/night-thiefs-is-looking-for-pvp-pilots.html#IDComment170929296 Yeah, it's the plural of a singular name so it makes english teachers angry Fri, 8 Jul 2011 03:48:51 +0000 http://aufescapevelocity.blogspot.com/2011/07/night-thiefs-is-looking-for-pvp-pilots.html#IDComment170929296 http://www.evenews24.com/2011/06/21/wildly-inappropriatedot-final-meeting-recording-leaked-some-more-random-drama/#IDComment165133539 Inappropriate Goons Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:35:38 +0000 http://www.evenews24.com/2011/06/21/wildly-inappropriatedot-final-meeting-recording-leaked-some-more-random-drama/#IDComment165133539 http://eveoganda.blogspot.com/2011/06/big-lie.html#IDComment165086802 :) Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:36:03 +0000 http://eveoganda.blogspot.com/2011/06/big-lie.html#IDComment165086802 http://www.evenews24.com/2011/06/14/breaking-news-lulzsec-claims-responsability-for-attacks-on-eve-online-website-tranquility-server/#IDComment162642203 :( Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:07:39 +0000 http://www.evenews24.com/2011/06/14/breaking-news-lulzsec-claims-responsability-for-attacks-on-eve-online-website-tranquility-server/#IDComment162642203 http://aufescapevelocity.blogspot.com/2011/05/roaming-under-influence-part-duex.html#IDComment148822660 It was fun! Nice to see you out of those WH's too :) Bringing back the old days one roam at a time Wed, 4 May 2011 14:46:55 +0000 http://aufescapevelocity.blogspot.com/2011/05/roaming-under-influence-part-duex.html#IDComment148822660 http://eveoganda.blogspot.com/2011/03/thunderdome.html#IDComment137490903 Interesting. Could be a unique thing. I wonder though if it should only be allowed in hisec (and not under war dec) to keep pilots from out waiting enemies while re-enforcements arrive. Otherwise; more types of game play are always awesome! Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:03:06 +0000 http://eveoganda.blogspot.com/2011/03/thunderdome.html#IDComment137490903 http://aufescapevelocity.blogspot.com/2011/03/hot-drop.html#IDComment136806429 Nice :) Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:20:16 +0000 http://aufescapevelocity.blogspot.com/2011/03/hot-drop.html#IDComment136806429 http://eveoganda.blogspot.com/2011/03/swallowed-tears.html#IDComment135356176 He seems a bit upset about the situation :-p Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:46:23 +0000 http://eveoganda.blogspot.com/2011/03/swallowed-tears.html#IDComment135356176 http://manasi.eveplayer.net/2011/03/thinking-cap-continued/#IDComment134267626 A hic cannot be repped with bubbles up but a Broadsword or an Onyx for example can tank one hell of a lot of active dps. Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:38:26 +0000 http://manasi.eveplayer.net/2011/03/thinking-cap-continued/#IDComment134267626 http://www.rifterdrifter.com/2011/03/new-look/#IDComment134199828 Looking good Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:07:38 +0000 http://www.rifterdrifter.com/2011/03/new-look/#IDComment134199828 http://manasi.eveplayer.net/2011/03/thinking-cap-continued/#IDComment134199348 Manasi, I have to disagree about the changes to lo sec you have brought up. I know I am in the minority in the way I feel but I think lo sec needs to go another direction. This is strictly my opinion but I see the problem with lo sec already being: that there isn't any reason to go there except for PvP. Adding PvP bonuses would only make that problem worse. This would basically make it mini-null sec. Plus, making it that much harder to traverse while adding in the ability to camp the gates exactly like 0.0 would only cause larger alliances to work harder to extend (at least limited) control up to the hi sec borders. Here are some examples of things I would rather see (aimed at helping smaller groups find a home out of hi sec): --A method of claiming a station through market buildup, industrial usage, or other peaceful/industrial means. This would not allow for denying docking rights but MAY allow for a collection of a percentage of the NPC fees typically collected in that station. --A means of calling for Concord assistance for very short periods of limited time granted to those groups who have lived in a losec space and worked to protect it for a period of time. Perhaps driven by NPC kills or some other (new) base line. --The ability to earn through positive methods or bribe for (*or* otherwise earn through negative methods) a right for Concord to turn a blind eye to your activities for a period of time. In this time the gate guns would neither attack nor help you in a fight. They would not fire on anyone in your group or anyone engaged in combat with your group. You would also not earn negative standing for all (non-pod) kills while under this Concord "blackout." *This is similar to your approach but requires you to earn this right through either positive or negative actions and expend a resource to use it (so it wouldn't be a permanent status) Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:04:50 +0000 http://manasi.eveplayer.net/2011/03/thinking-cap-continued/#IDComment134199348