<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/116</link>
		<description>Comments by entersandman</description>
<item>
<title>Political Grind : Intense Debate</title>
<link>http://politicalgrind.com/2007/08/01/intense-debate/#IDComment378</link>
<description>So it encourages commenters not to make a bunch of generally pointless comments, lest they not be rated... I&amp;#039;m down with that. But what if there happens to be some &amp;quot;rating apathy&amp;quot;; what if people just don&amp;#039;t rate (or don&amp;#039;t know they&amp;#039;re supposed to)? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Aug 2007 14:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://politicalgrind.com/2007/08/01/intense-debate/#IDComment378</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Political Grind : Intense Debate</title>
<link>http://politicalgrind.com/2007/08/01/intense-debate/#IDComment372</link>
<description>No problem, it looks like you guys have done a great job with this. I just noticed the reputation meter; very nice idea. Just wondering... how do you get or lose reputation points? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Aug 2007 13:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://politicalgrind.com/2007/08/01/intense-debate/#IDComment372</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Political Grind : Barack Obombya</title>
<link>http://politicalgrind.com/2007/08/03/barack-obombya/#IDComment371</link>
<description>Hmm, well my first comment was based on my just reading the quote above. After that, I actually went and read the entire speech, which I advise everyone to do, because this quote is a pretty terrible representation of the overall message conveyed. In fact, I&amp;#039;ll go so far as to say the media should be embarrassed for giving only this section of the speech so much coverage; I don&amp;#039;t normally like to plug myself, but I just wrote a post on this topic at my site: &lt;a href=&quot;http://mangoicecream.wordpress.com/2007/08/03/what-baracks-really-saying/ &quot;&gt;http://mangoicecream.wordpress.com/2007/08/03/wha...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Aug 2007 13:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://politicalgrind.com/2007/08/03/barack-obombya/#IDComment371</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Political Grind : Intense Debate</title>
<link>http://politicalgrind.com/2007/08/01/intense-debate/#IDComment368</link>
<description>I must admit, this is pretty awesome. I love the thread system especially. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Aug 2007 10:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://politicalgrind.com/2007/08/01/intense-debate/#IDComment368</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Political Grind : Barack Obombya</title>
<link>http://politicalgrind.com/2007/08/03/barack-obombya/#IDComment365</link>
<description>Haha, post-Iraq (if we&amp;#039;ve even actually arrived at that state), this is a dangerous dangerous comment to make. However, the &amp;quot;actionable intelligence&amp;quot; comment he makes will surely refer to far more thoroughly scrutinized evidence if a situation with Pakistan does indeed arise. If there&amp;#039;s one real positive we can take from the Iraq situation, it&amp;#039;s that future administrations won&amp;#039;t be able to get away with pushing their own agendas through fronts like &amp;quot;wars on terrors.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;All in all, I see this more as Obama appealing to that portion of America which wanted to see a strong American reaction, post 9/11. Those familiar with his work (or those who&amp;#039;ve read his book) know that he pushed pretty firmly for multilateral action regarding Iraq, and it&amp;#039;s doubtful he&amp;#039;d press in another country on different terms. And, heh, nice title. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Aug 2007 09:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://politicalgrind.com/2007/08/03/barack-obombya/#IDComment365</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>