en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/480441 Comments by enrikenyc http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/buzz-mets-discussing-sheffield/#IDComment18088886 That would be a better option. Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:12:37 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/buzz-mets-discussing-sheffield/#IDComment18088886 http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/buzz-mets-discussing-sheffield/#IDComment18088542 I think there's more risks than rewards obviously. It won't help with having Sheffield breathing down Church's and Murphy's back for playing time. I trust our outfield the way it is. If he doesn't mind being a bench player, then fine. But that's highly unlikely. Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:02:55 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/buzz-mets-discussing-sheffield/#IDComment18088542 http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/buzz-mets-discussing-sheffield/#IDComment18088118 Really don't like the idea of having Sheffield. Where the hell is he going to play? Fri, 3 Apr 2009 14:51:46 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/buzz-mets-discussing-sheffield/#IDComment18088118